Talk:2014–15 Liverpool F.C. season

Football: England / Liverpool / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Liverpool task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Merseyside Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Where have the released players gone? edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi guys, why have the released players been removed from the article? I like to look occasionally to see if they've found a club and if so where they've gone Clarky323 (talk) 22:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

First team stats edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

What is wrong with putting up stats for first team, where and when was the player signed from, appearances and goals? These stats exist on other clubs' pages. These stats are relevant too. Why are theese removed then? Can somebody direct me to where this 'consensus' has taken place? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.45.212.134 (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

There has been discussions on the talkpage last season and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 88#Season articles Player details (again) and probably on more places. The main idea is that this is a article for this season liverpool and there is no need for information on where the player comes from and how many apperances and goals he has in the club, that can be found on the player-article and does not affect the performance this season. Also that partm is (often) completely unsourced and WP:OR. QED237 (talk) 21:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also just because they are in other clubs' articles does not mean it should be on here. Mr tim111 (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014–15 Liverpool F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140711215817/http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/166178-lfc-statement-suarez-to-leave to http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/166178-lfc-statement-suarez-to-leave

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic