Talk:2011 Wisconsin Senate recall elections
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editPrimary: I am not certain, but i think the primary is non-partisan, between all challengers who file,and there is no specific democratic or republican primary, so those labels should be changed, if they are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.129.140 (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Number of valid signatures
editThe sections on Republicans and Democrats ought to have consistent formatting. So both sections ought to list the total number of valid signatures (if it can be found) or neither should. --JamesAM (talk) 03:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- It the information is available for one, but not the other, it doesn't make sense to delete information just because we don't currently have access to the equivalent information for the second party. Keeping it acts as a prod for editors to go forth and look for the information; removing makes it highly unlikely we will ever have the information for both. Wikipedia is a project, not a completed work. As such, we shouldn't delete things just because something else has yet to be done. If this is issue is significant for you, you can either try to find the information for yourself. For the time being, I'll put a {{incomplete}} template with a comment next to it explaining the incompleteness. -Rrius (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
(Fake) Candidates?
editWhat's up with labeling some of the candidates in the primaries "Fake"? Are they some sort of dummy candidate on the ballet, or is this a bit of vandalism, or what? Buddy431 (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Removal discussion
editThis removal was disputed simply on the grounds that it's a lot of text. It's built on shoddy references, it's fundamentally incomplete, and has no bearing on the article 4 years later. Why should we keep it? Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- With no further protests, I'll remove this section. Thargor Orlando (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Wisconsin Senate recall elections, 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110715134552/http://www.sheboyganpress.com:80/article/20110711/SHE0101/107110373/Fake-Democrats-face-real-ones-Wisconsin-Senate-recall-primaries to http://www.sheboyganpress.com/article/20110711/SHE0101/107110373/Fake-Democrats-face-real-ones-Wisconsin-Senate-recall-primaries
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)