Talk:2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 28, 2011Good article nomineeListed
July 23, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 18, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 8, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 21, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team was picked to win the Atlantic 10 Conference for the fourth consecutive season?
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: YE Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

First off, I fixed the redlinks in the article.

Well-written:  

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Verifiable with no original research:
  •  

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  • Broad in its coverage:
  •  

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  •  

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  •  

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  •  

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. 

    YE Tropical Cyclone 16:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC) I really like this article, it is well-written and has very good content. If this article goes to WP:FAC, the wirtting may need to be more encyclopedic. However, I am passing the article, but watch out for redlinks. YE Tropical Cyclone 17:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

    • Do you have any examples of the writing not being encyclopedic enough? ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 05:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

    External links modified edit

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

    External links modified edit

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified 6 external links on 2010–11 Temple Owls men's basketball team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply