Talk:2009 Tour of Ireland

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment

edit

Stub? Really? What is the article so clearly lacking that it needs in order to be more than the most bare minimum article Wikipedia has? Nosleep break my slumber 08:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

This article should clearly be assessed as a Start-article, since the race has started and results are up-to-date. I see there has been written some prose aswell, so this article could be a B-article when the race is over. lil2mas (talk) 14:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I agree, but I didn't really want to change as I'm this article's primary author. I think we as a project are a tad too sheepish when it comes to article assessment. Nosleep break my slumber 08:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I completely agree, but I believe it's because of lazyness, not knowinglessness. People lose interest once a race is finished, and forgets to change the assessment afterwards. If you look at the 2009 Tour de France-article, it is still assessed as a Start-article. It clearly shouldn't be any less than a C-article! lil2mas (talk) 09:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 Tour of Ireland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply