Talk:2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured article2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic star2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season is the main article in the 2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 20, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 17, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
December 15, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Todo edit

All storms need a description. --Anhamirak 18:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Id like to see a seasonal effects chart/seasonal summary section added to this article before it becomes a GA.Jason Rees (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I also notice a dead link but more importantly why are you citing the TCOP for Australia and the South Pacific countries to cite the SWIO names? Jason Rees (talk) 12:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Does it need an effects chart? Is that part of the GA criteria? I fixed the broken link and used GP. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes it needs one to help with verification but i note that these are basic things that should of been put in already imo.Jason Rees (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
IDK, it's never been discussed to be a requirement of project season GA's. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "The strongest storm was Cyclone Hary, which became the first very intense tropical cyclone since 2000" - Is it really all that important to mention that Hary was the first very intense tropical cyclone since 2000? That would be like saying that Hurricane Dean of 2007 was the first Category 5 hurricane since Hurricane Wilma in 2005.
    • Considering how unusual they are, yes, I think it is worth mentioning. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "strengthening into Tropical Cyclone Bessi on November 27. On November 29, it moved into" - That "on November 27. On November 29" part seems rather redundant.
  • "Severe Tropical Storm with the Meteorological Services of Madagascar giving it the name Cyprien late on January 1.[1][8] Cyprien soon became a serious threat to western Madagascar.[1] Convection began to dissipate while wind shear increased and that led to the storm weakening quickly from a Severe Tropical Storm to a Tropical Depression." - Is "Severe Tropical Storm" and "Tropical Depression" supposed to be capitalized? In the other basins, we have such classifications lowercased unless the name of said tropical cyclone is used immediately after.
  • "As it made landfall on western Madagascar, it damaged over 150 homes. It also dropped heavy rainfall, and there were no deaths." - Why not mention that there were 2 missing and $181,000 (2002 USD). Also, according to Cyprien's main article, there were 661 homes destroyed in Morondava.
    • Meteo France said there were no deaths. I didn't feel it was necessary to mention the 2 missing people. I did add the destroyed homes though. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "It turned to the southewest the next day" - Typo; "southewest" --> "southwest"
  • On References #17 and #28, the accessdates have double dashes. Look at this: "Retrieved 2012-11--14." and "Retrieved 2012-11--14."
  • For References #11, #16, #21, #22, #27, #31, and #32, shouldn't "Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary" be the title? After all, the Australian Severe Weather is the publisher and Gary Padgett is the author.
    • But it's a series of work, so the title is the month of the summary. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

You know the drill. I will come back in 7 days unless you contact me otherwise. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 00:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Ok, I am now satisfied with the condition of this article and feel that everything was adequately addressed. Therefore, I am going to pass this article and list it as a GA. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply