 | 1 (2013 film) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 23, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | A fact from 1 (2013 film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1 (2013 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Geardona (talk · contribs) 00:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- This appears to be a nomination with little to no (recent) improvement from the nominator, along with having several other issues such as;
1) Being rather short and narrow in coverage
2) Being largely a plot summary of the movie, not a issue in of itself, but that section really dominates the prose, would like to see more in other areas.
3) Having no real coverage of its release
4) Having no real coverage of its production
5) The "Critical Reception" consisting of quotes almost entirely
6) Being a drive by nomination
Unfortunately, I must mark this nomination as
Failed. Geardona (talk to me?) 01:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.