Talk:1995 French presidential election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Angola Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Angola (assessed as Low-importance).

RolandR

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Yesterday I made a comment about RolandR removing the reason on the fall of Balladur's popularity which I restored and I have been brought to task stating that it was a personal attack. It was not a personal attack but a personal criticism on RolandR's failure to find an article to support the said reason on the fall of Balladur's popularity and one should able to detect such distinctions. Information should only be removed if it is known for sure that the information is not true. This wasn't the case here therefore its removal was not justified. Therefore the criticism was justified.

Do not contact me to address this situation whatever one has to say, say it here because I would construe such contact as harassment. 220.239.167.151 (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people states explicitly "Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced". The policy on personal attacks states "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done". In addition, the policy on edit summaries states "Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved". To write in an edit summary that "RolandR does not know what he is talking about" is insulting and disparaging, and therefore a personal attack, and my removal of unsourced contentious material about Edouard Balladur, a living person, was not only acceptable, but mandatory under Wikipedia policies. The material should never have been included without a source, and I am not entirely happy about the source now added: if this was indeed notable, there should be a more prominent source than a Google cached article from the New Straits Times. RolandR (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Lionel Jospin, 1998 (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic