Talk:1986–1987 John Deere strike

(Redirected from Talk:1986–1987 John Deere-UAW labor dispute)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sources:
  • Boshart, Rod (December 4, 1986). "Idled UAW workers trust in Deere 'dies'". United Press International. Archived from the original on October 22, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2021.
  • Boshart, Rod (December 4, 1986). "Idled UAW workers 'bury' Deere cooperation". United Press International. Archived from the original on October 22, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2021.
    • ALT1:... that on December 4, 1986, 700 union workers held a mock funeral during the 1986–1987 John Deere strike which culminated in the burning of a coffin and a Christmas tree covered in company hats? Sources: (see above)

Moved to mainspace by Gwennie-nyan (talk) (via AfC). Self-nominated at 01:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
  • Other problems:  
QPQ: None required.

Overall:   I'm not sure if the image can run because of the VTRS issue. We can wait to see if that gets resolved, or I can approve the hook without the image. Also, I've made some minor grammar changes to the hooks – I hope that's okay! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 03:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Ezlev: currently working out the VTRS issues. Hopefully will be resolved in a day or two. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋⦆ 13:04, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Ezlev: apparently the issues are going to take a lot longer to work out. So, I've removed the image. Please approve without it. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋⦆ 12:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Approved! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 15:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
To T:DYK/P2

Naming

edit

@Firefangledfeathers, I am curious. Nearly all sources I've gone through refer to him as Bob, however some call him his given name Robert, after all he like many others went by Bob in its usage as hypocorism. ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋⦆ 14:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If Bob is more common, we should just call him Bob. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Agree ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋⦆ 14:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply