Talk:1977 Oman cyclone

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article1977 Oman cyclone has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star1977 Oman cyclone is part of the Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2014Good article nomineeListed
May 15, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:1977 Oman cyclone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 04:47, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Ill get to this tomorrow. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:47, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • "The cyclone was the strongest on record to make landfall on the Arabian Peninsula, until Cyclone Gonu surpassed it in 2007" is it still the 2nd strongest overall? You say that in the lead. Also, the second part of the sentence is awkward. I'd say something like. "At that time, the cyclone was the strongest on record to make landfall on the Arabian Peninsula, but was surpassed by Cyclone Gonu 2007." 15:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
  • "The military base in Masirah raised a Category 3 warning on the morning of June 12," wtf is "a Category 3 warning"
  • "Rain totals were significant, with a total of 482.3 millimetres (18.99 in) falling 40 kilometres (25 mi) northeast of Salalah.[6] A station on Masirah Island reported reported 430.6 millimetres (16.95 in) in 24 hours, more than six times the average annual precipitation there." again with the not abbreviating units. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1977 Oman cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply