Talk:1933 Australian Championships – Women's doubles

Tennis Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1933 Australian Championships – Women's doubles is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Result in the Final edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Only few sources, official AO included, give 6–3, 6–2 as the final result. Some cause even more confusion, stating one thing in the main body of an article and other one in the "details/results" section. Most sources, however, gives 6–3, 6–3. Even foreign ones, like this or this. This article is the only one I could find that describes play with details - maybe some native English speaker or somebody with better understanding of English language than mine could draw ultimate conclusion out of it.--Borucic (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic