Talk:1930–31 Cardiff City F.C. season

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kosack in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1930–31 Cardiff City F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:29, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • make the lead into two paras
  • ...club's board to sanction the sale of several players... - why not just "allow"?
  • Cardiff conceded 13 goals and scored only four in reply - both words or both numerals...tricky spread I know....sigh
  • securing a –1 draw with Everton - presume this is a 1-1 draw....?
  • Cardiff gained only on further point in October - "one"?
  • The August–December is a bit heavy with scores and goals (naturally) - good to have the bit on appendiicitis in it. Any other events would be good if there are any to add (err.....anything about the weather?)
  • If you can find a source, maybe in the Aftermath section how long they remained in div 3 south before returning?

Otherwise a pretty miserable read (nice, but sad subject matter :)) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  


Overall:

Pass or Fail:   - a couple of minor issues....nearly there @Kosack:....
@Casliber: Thanks very much for the review, I've amended all of the points above and expanded slightly where possible. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply