Talk:1892–93 Small Heath F.C. season
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Struway2 in topic GA Review
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1892–93 Small Heath F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 29, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Small Heath F.C. was not promoted to the Football League First Division after winning the inaugural Second Division title in 1892–93, while the second- and third-place teams were? |
Untitled edit
It could only happen to Birmingham City, really, couldn't it? Totnesmartin (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1892–93 Small Heath F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Utinsh (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Lead is balanced, prose is good, article is neutral, references are formatted nicely, no dab/dead links. The only issue I managed to find is overlinking; Burton Swifts, Northwich Victoria, Wales national team, Middlesbrough, West Bromwich Albion, etc. Not much to do, article is in great shape, I'll pass it when overlinking issue is resolved. Utinsh (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)