Talk:1812 Louisiana hurricane
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Hahc21 in topic GA Review
 | 1812 Louisiana hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1812 Louisiana hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 22:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Review
edit- Lead
- Lead is too short. It should be expanded.
- Done. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- History
- "the storm's track track" repeat? or this is deliberate?
- Well fuck me :( --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't meant to be rude :(... — ΛΧΣ21 05:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Well fuck me :( --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- "becoming the closest major hurricane to New Orleans" This is covered by reference #2?
- In the opening line of ref 2 - "Historical data, consisting of diaries, ship logbooks, ship protests, and newspapers, reconstruct the path, intensity, and societal impacts of a major hurricane in 1812 that is the closest known storm to pass New Orleans". --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes it is lol. The issue is that I had my pdf plugin damaged and couldn't see the document :( — ΛΧΣ21 05:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- In the opening line of ref 2 - "Historical data, consisting of diaries, ship logbooks, ship protests, and newspapers, reconstruct the path, intensity, and societal impacts of a major hurricane in 1812 that is the closest known storm to pass New Orleans". --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Impact
- The first line of impact is too short to be separated, I guess. Can't it be merged?
- It's a very distinct area though from the rest of the article. I think it should be separate. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough :) — ΛΧΣ21 05:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- It's a very distinct area though from the rest of the article. I think it should be separate. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Everything else looks fine. — ΛΧΣ21 22:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)