Talk:1303 Hongdong earthquake

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 November 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month.

What is an aftershock? edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Currently the article asserts:

Some records state that another similar earthquake occurred in August 6, 1303 which may have been an aftershock of the Hongdong earthquake.^[1] Once again, Taiyuan and Pingyang suffered massive damage along with the area surrounding the temple of Emperor Yao, and over 100,000 people were said to have died. However, rebuilding had been largely completed within nine months.

How can an aftershock from a September 25 earthquake have occurred on August 6, 50 days earlier? It seems more likely that the 1303 Crete Earthquake (August 8, 1303) was an "aftershock" of the August 6 "similar earthquake", than that the text of the present article is reliable, and I find no support for this assertion in the portion I was able to view of the cited text, but even if it does, the dates alone make this assertion dubious, at best. 68.113.225.4 (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your views. The reference has an unsourced quote which makes no sense given the scale of the damage caused by the Hongdong earthquake. As no-one has made any effort to respond to your concerns over the last 15 months, I think it is time to delete the offending section. Chewings72 (talk) 09:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Xie, Xin-sheng; Jiang, Wa-li; Wang, Huan-zhen; Feng, Xi-ying (2004). "Holocene activities of the Taigu fault zone, Shanxi Province, and their relations with the 1303 Hongdong M=8 earthquake". Acta Seismologica Sinica. 17 (3): 308–321. doi:10.1007/s11589-004-0053-x.

Add topic

[1] Xie, Xin-sheng; Jiang, Wa-li; Wang, Huan-zhen; Feng, Xi-ying (2004). "Holocene activities of the Taigu fault zone, Shanxi Province, and their relations with the 1303 Hongdong M=8 earthquake". Acta Seismologica Sinica. 17 (3): 308–321. doi:10.1007/s11589-004-0053-x.

[1]