Talk:...Thirteen Years Later

...Thirteen Years Later has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 5, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from ...Thirteen Years Later appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Millennium's "...Thirteen Years Later" featured the members of Kiss in dual roles?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/...Thirteen Years Later.

Wikipedia

Television: The X-Files Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:...Thirteen Years Later/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just three minor issues:

Perhaps begin the second paragraph of the lead with 'In this episode...' for clarity
"The episode has evoked..." "It has evoked"
Wikilink ‘1997–98 television season’ under note

A well written article. No dead links or dabs and could find no close-paraphrasing issues. Will pass once comments have been addressed. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Completed. DepressedPer (talk) 19:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sweet, happy to pass now. Lemonade51 (talk) 20:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Late getting to this—thanks to you both for the review and the fixes! GRAPPLE X 18:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic