Talk:Ġebel ġol-Baħar
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Xwejnusgozo in topic Taboodada sources
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Taboodada sources edit
Re User:Doug Weller's message on my talk page: The two "taboodada" refs are for the following statements:
According to some sources, the site may to be "the largest known prehistoric complex on Earth".
According to Zeitlmair, the site bears similarities to the temple of Ħaġar Qim on mainland Malta.
Both statements explicitly state that they are opinions, and are not written as though they are facts. By the way, I'm not trying to promote the theory that Ġebel ġol-Baħar was built by aliens (or that it is actually a temple); I personally think that it is just a pile of rocks dumped on the seabed. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know you don't take the claims seriously, no problem. But the source still fails our criteria as a source, and saying "some sources" is normally to be avoided - as the sources aren't named. Doug Weller (talk) 20:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I removed the part about the largest known prehistoric complex, and I'll try to find some source for the comparison to Ħaġar Qim. Best regards, Xwejnusgozo (talk) 20:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know you don't take the claims seriously, no problem. But the source still fails our criteria as a source, and saying "some sources" is normally to be avoided - as the sources aren't named. Doug Weller (talk) 20:14, 1 August 2015 (UTC)