Society of Saint Pius X

The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), officially the Fraternal Society of Saint Pius X (FSSPX; Latin: Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii X), is an international priestly fraternity founded in 1970 by Marcel Lefebvre, an Archbishop of the Catholic Church. Lefebvre, a Frenchman, was a leading traditionalist voice at the Second Vatican Council with the Coetus Internationalis Patrum and was also the Superior General of the Holy Ghost Fathers until 1968. The Society was initially established as a pious union of the Catholic Church with the permission of François Charrière the Bishop of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg in Switzerland.

Society of Saint Pius X
Fraternal Society of Saint Pius X
Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X
Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii X
Héraldique meuble Coeur vendéen.svg
  • SSPX
  • FSSPX (official)
Named afterPope Pius X
Established1970; 51 years ago (1970)
FounderMarcel Lefebvre
TypePious union
HeadquartersMenzingen, Switzerland
Membership (2020)
  • 1,114 members[1]
  •  • 680 priests
  •  • 217 seminarians
  •  • 217 others
Superior General
Davide Pagliarani
Key people Edit this at Wikidata

The society is named after Pope Pius X, whose anti-Modernist stance the society stresses,[2] retaining the Tridentine Mass and pre-Vatican II ritual books in Latin for the other sacraments. The present Superior General of the society is Davide Pagliarani, succeeding Bishop Bernard Fellay.[3] There are a number of organisations derived from the SSPX, most notably; the Society of Saint Pius V (SSPV), a sedevacantist group mostly in the United States and the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP) which was made a society of apostolic life under Pope John Paul II in 1988.

Tensions between the society and the Holy See reached their height in 1988, when Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops without the Apostolic Mandate and against a personal warning by Pope John Paul II, known as the Écône consecrations,[4] resulting in Rome declaring that the bishops who consecrated or were consecrated had incurred latae sententiae (automatic) excommunication.[5] Though the priestly fraternity denied that the bishops incurred any penalty, claiming canon law in their defense, the declared excommunication of the surviving bishops was at their request removed in 2009 in the hope of speedily reaching "full reconciliation and complete communion".[6]

The society has seen a growing recognition of its sacramental and pastoral activities by the Holy See, extending permanent canonical recognition to confessions heard by its priests[7] and allowing local ordinaries to grant delegation to priests of the society for officially witnessing marriages.[8] The significance of these recognitions is that, unique among the sacraments of the Catholic Church, both confession and marriage require canonical jurisdiction for their validity. Critics of the society contended that such confessions could not be heard or marriages witnessed by a Society priest, due to a defect of form as a consequence of lacking jurisdiction.[9] In addition, the Holy See named Bishop Fellay judge in a canonical trial against one of the society's priests.[10] Nevertheless the Society, citing canon law in its defense, contends on its part that it possessed supplied jurisdiction for confessions due to a state of necessity.[11]

History of the SSPXEdit

Lefebvre, the society's founder, celebrating Tridentine Mass

Like Traditionalist Catholicism in general, the SSPX was born out of opposition to changes in the Catholic Church that followed the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). The founder and central figure of the society was the French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who had served the Catholic Church as Apostolic Delegate for French-speaking Africa, Archbishop of Dakar, and Superior General of the Congregation of the Holy Spirit, a missionary order of priests.

Foundation of the societyEdit

In May 1970, shortly after his retirement as Superior General of the Congregation of the Holy Spirit, Lefebvre was approached by eleven members of the Pontifical French Seminary in Rome. They sought Lefebvre's advice on a conservative seminary where they could complete their studies.[12] He directed them to the University of Fribourg, in Switzerland.

In late 1970, at age 65, urged by the abbot of Hauterive Abbey and the Dominican theologian Father Marie-Dominique Philippe to teach the seminarians personally, Lefebvre, feeling too old to undertake such a large project, told them he would visit François Charrière, Bishop of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg, with a request to set up a religious society. He told them, if he said to go through with it, he would see in it a sign of divine providence. Charrière granted Lefebvre's request and, with a document predated by six days to 1 November 1970, he established the Society of St. Pius X as a pia unio (Latin, for "pious, or holy, union") on a provisional (ad experimentum) basis for six years. Pia unio status was the first stage through which a Catholic organisation passed prior to gaining official recognition as a religious institute or society of apostolic life. (Since 1983, the term "association of the faithful" has replaced "pia unio".) The Society of Saint Pius X was formally founded, adhering to all canonical norms, and receiving the episcopal blessing and encouragement of the local ordinary. Some Swiss laymen offered the International Seminary of Saint Pius X at Écône to the newly formed group, and in 1971 the first 24 candidates entered, followed by a further 32 in October 1972.[13]

Normally, after a suitable period of experience and consultation with the Holy See, a bishop would raise a pia unio to official status at diocesan level. Lefebvre attempted to bypass this stage, and contacted three different departments of the Holy See in order to secure early recognition for his society. He succeeded in obtaining a letter of encouragement from Cardinal John Wright, prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, but there was no approval from the Holy See congregation responsible for raising an association to the level desired by Lefebvre. Cardinal Wright's letter, dated 18 February 1971, said with regard to the field of competence of Cardinal Wright's own Congregation, that the association "will be able to contribute much to accomplishing the plan drawn up by this Congregation for worldwide sharing of clergy." Cardinal Wright was still recommending prospective seminarians to apply to Écône as late as 1973.[14]

The establishment of the SSPX was unwelcome to a number of churchmen, most notably to the French bishops, whose theological outlook was quite different from that of Lefebvre and who had important connections with the Holy See Cardinal Secretary of State, Jean-Marie Villot. Much of the tension between Lefebvre and his critics[who?] must be seen in the context of long-term theological, cultural, and political divisions between opposing elements of French society.[citation needed] According to Michael Davies, a defender of Lefebvre, at the meeting of the French episcopal conference at Lourdes in 1972, the seminary at Écône acquired the nickname "le séminaire sauvage"—the "wildcat seminary",[14] and by November 1974 the French episcopate had indicated that they would not incardinate any of Lefebvre's priests in their dioceses. They also publicly criticised Catholics who remained attached to the Tridentine Mass.[15] By this time, the SSPX had opened additional seminaries in Armada, Michigan, (1973) and in Rome (1974).

The society's first seminary, the International Seminary of Saint Pius X, in Écône, Switzerland. As of 2021, Society has 6 seminaries - apart from Switzerland in Germany, France, Argentina, Australia, and United States.[16]

Canonical visitation of seminaryEdit

The first sign of curial intervention was a Vatican meeting on 26 March 1974. By June 1974, a commission of cardinals had been formed to inquire into the SSPX, and decided on a canonical visitation of the seminary by two Belgian priests, held 11–13 November 1974. Franz Schmidberger, later superior general of the society, said that their report was favourable.[17] However, the seminarians and staff at Écône were shocked by some liberal theological opinions expressed by the two priests. In what he later described as a mood of "doubtlessly excessive indignation", Lefebvre wrote a declaration denouncing what he considered liberal trends "clearly evident" in the council and in the subsequent reforms.[18] This document was leaked and published in January 1975, in the French Traditionalist Catholic journal Itinéraires.

Lefebvre was in serious difficulties.[13] In January 1975, Bishop Pierre Mamie of Fribourg wrote to Rome stating his intention to withdraw the pia unio status that his predecessor had granted. In the same month, Lefebvre was summoned to the Vatican, meeting with the cardinals on 13 February and 3 March. Lefebvre was surprised by their hostile tone: at one point a French cardinal, Gabriel-Marie Garrone, reportedly called him a "fool".[13]

Growing tensionsEdit

On 6 May 1975, with the approval of the cardinals, Bishop Mamie withdrew the SSPX's pia unio status. Lefebvre instructed his lawyer to lodge appeals, and he ultimately petitioned the Holy See's supreme court, the Apostolic Signatura, which turned down the appeal. From this point onward, the SSPX was no longer recognised as a canonical organization.

An SSPX priest in cope and biretta.

Lefebvre and the leadership of the society have always maintained that he was treated unfairly by the Roman Curia, that the suppression of the SSPX was unjust, and that the procedures violated the 1917 Code of Canon Law.

The SSPX continued to operate in spite of its discountenance. In the consistory of 24 May 1976, Pope Paul VI rebuked Archbishop Lefebvre by name—reportedly the first time in 200 years that a pope had publicly reprimanded a Catholic bishop—and appealed to him and his followers to change their minds.[19]

Lefebvre announced that he intended to confer ordination on some of his students at the end of June 1976. On 12 June 1976, the Nuncio in Switzerland was given instructions to inform Lefebvre that, by special order of Pope Paul VI, he was forbidden to do so.[20][21] On 25 June 1976, Archbishop Giovanni Benelli, the deputy Secretary of State, wrote directly to Lefebvre, confirming, by special mandate of the Pope, the prohibition to administer the holy orders, and warning him of the canonical penalties for Lefebvre himself and those whom he would ordain.[20][22] Lefebvre ignored the warnings, and went ahead with the ordinations on 29 June 1976.

In the sermon on that occasion, Lefebvre explicitly recognized that he might be struck with suspension, and the new priests with an irregularity that could theoretically prevent them from saying Mass.[23] On the next day, 1 July 1976, the Press Office of the Holy See declared that in accordance with canon 2373 of the then Code of Canon Law, Lefebvre was automatically suspended for one year from conferring ordination, and that those whom he had ordained were automatically suspended from the exercise of the order received. It was also announced that the Holy See was examining Lefebvre's disobedience to the orders of the Pope.[20][24]

On 11 July 1976, Lefebvre signed a certificate of receipt of a letter from Cardinal Sebastiano Baggio, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, intimating that further penalties would be imposed in accordance with canon 2331 §1 of the then Code of Canon Law concerning obstinate disobedience to legitimate precepts or prohibitions of the Roman Pontiff. He was enjoined, within ten days of receipt of the letter, to take steps "to repair the scandal caused." In a letter of 17 July to Pope Paul VI, Lefebvre declared that he judged his action of 29 June to be legitimate. The Pope considered this response inadequate, and on his instructions the Congregation for Bishops, on 22 July 1976, suspended Lefebvre for an indefinite time from all exercise of holy orders—he could not confer any of the Sacraments, save Reconciliation or Baptism in an emergency (suspension a divinis).[20]

1988 Écône consecrationsEdit

A central controversy surrounding the SSPX concerns the consecration by Archbishop Lefebvre and Brazilian bishop Antônio de Castro Mayer of four SSPX priests as bishops in 1988, in violation of the orders of Pope John Paul II.

By 1987, Archbishop Lefebvre was 81. If he had died at that point, the SSPX could have their members ordained to the priesthood only at the hands of non-SSPX bishops, regarded by Lefebvre as unreliable and non-orthodox. In June 1987, Lefebvre announced his intention to consecrate a successor to the episcopacy. He implied that he intended to do this with or without the approval of the Holy See.[25] In the Catholic Church, a bishop requires the mandate of the Pope if he is to consecrate a bishop,[26] and an unauthorized consecration automatically incurs excommunication.[27] Earlier, Pope Pius XII, in his encyclical Ad Apostolorum principis, had described the sacramental activity of bishops who had been consecrated without papal approval as "gravely illicit, that is, criminal and sacrilegious".[28] The Roman authorities were grieved by Lefebvre's plan, but they began discussions with him and the SSPX, which led to the signing, on 5 May 1988, of a skeleton agreement between Lefebvre and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the future Pope Benedict XVI.

On Pope John Paul II's instructions, Cardinal Ratzinger replied to Lefebvre on 30 May, insisting on observance of the agreement of 5 May and adding that, if Lefebvre carried out unauthorized consecrations on 30 June, the promised authorization for the ordination to the episcopacy would be withdrawn.

On 3 June, Lefebvre wrote that he intended to proceed. On 9 June, the Pope replied with a personal letter, appealing to him to abandon a design that "would be seen as nothing other than a schismatic act, the theological and canonical consequences of which are known to you." Lefebvre did not reply, and the letter was made public on 16 June. For the first time, the Holy See stated publicly that Lefebvre was in danger of being excommunicated.

On 30 June 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre proceeded to ordain to the episcopate four priests of the SSPX. Antônio de Castro Mayer, the retired Bishop of Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil, assisted in the ceremony. Those consecrated as Bishops were: Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Alfonso de Galarreta, and Richard Williamson.

The following day, the Congregation for Bishops issued a decree declaring that Archbishop Lefebvre and the four newly ordained bishops had incurred the automatic canonical penalty of excommunication reserved to the Holy See.[29] On the following day, 2 July, Pope John Paul II issued an apostolic letter known as Ecclesia Dei in which he condemned the Archbishop's action.[30] The Pope stated that, since schism is defined in the 1983 Code of Canon Law as "withdrawal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or from communion with the members of the Church subject to him" (canon 751),[31] the consecration "constitute[d] a schismatic act", and that, by virtue of canon 1382 of the Code,[32] it entailed ipso facto excommunication for all the bishops involved.

Lefebvre argued that his actions had been necessary because the traditional form of the Catholic faith and sacraments would become extinct without Traditionalist clergy to pass them on to the next generation. He called the ordinations "opération survie" ("Operation Survival"), citing in his defense canons 1323 and 1324 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, the first of which says that "a person who acted coerced by grave fear, even if only relatively grave, or due to necessity or grave inconvenience unless the act is intrinsically evil or tends to the harm of souls" is not subject to penalty for violating a law or precept, while the other says "the perpetrator of a violation is not exempt from a penalty, but the penalty established by law or precept must be tempered or a penance employed in its place if the delict was committed ... by a person who thought in culpable error that one of the circumstances mentioned in can. 1323, nn. 4 or 5 was present."[33]

Some members of the SSPX disassociated themselves from the society as a result of Lefebvre's actions and, with the approval of the Holy See, formed a separate society called the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter.

Discussions with the Holy SeeEdit

Discussions between the Holy See and the Society of Saint Pius X towards an eventual reconciliation have been ongoing. For years after the 1988 consecrations, there was little if any dialogue between the SSPX and the Holy See. This state of affairs ended when the society led a large pilgrimage to Rome for the "Great Jubilee" of 2000.

Nine years later, on 21 January 2009 the Holy See remitted the excommunications of the society's bishops that it had declared at the time of the 1988 consecrations and expressed the hope that all members of the society would follow this up by speedily returning to full communion with the Church.

Discussions since then have been complex, stemming from the society's insistence that the teachings of the Second Vatican Council on ecumenism, religious liberty, and collegiality are inconsistent with Catholic teaching and doctrine, a claim that the Holy See views as unacceptable, but recent discussions have indicated the possibility of an understanding. In an interview on 4 March 2017 with DICI, the official news organ of the society, Bishop Bernard Fellay stated: "Whether it is a question of religious liberty, collegiality, ecumenism, the new Mass, or even the new rites of the sacraments.... [...] And now all of a sudden, on these points that have been stumbling blocks, the emissaries from Rome tell us that they are open questions."[34] In the same month of March 2017, Archbishop Guido Pozzo, the prelate in charge of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, the Roman Curia's organ for traditionalist societies, stated that the Holy See and the society were close to an agreement regularizing the society's status.[35] In a letter of the same month it was announced that Pope Francis authorized diocesan bishops to grant to SSPX priests faculties to officiate at a marriage valid in the Catholic Church in cases where no priest in good standing could do so.[36]

In July 2017 Bishop Fellay signed a document along with a number of other clergy and academics labeled as a "Filial Correction" of Pope Francis. In twenty-five page document, which was made public in September after receiving no reply from the Holy See, they criticized the Pope for allegedly promoting heresy through various words, actions and omissions during his pontificate.[37]

Canonical situationEdit

Church of Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet in center of Paris, that has been occupied by the SSPX since 1977.

The canonical situation of the SSPX and of its clergy has been the subject of controversy since the 1988 Écône consecrations. While the society is not listed in Annuario Pontificio as a recognized society of apostolic life, it has nonetheless benefited from some significant allowances normally granted only to recognized orders and societies. In the November–December 2017 edition of the society's publication The Angelus, Fr. Francois Knittel, SSPX, wrote: "The Church authorities have gradually recognized the liceity and the validity of the ministry performed by the priests of the SSPX."[38]


On 27 March 2017, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith communicated that Pope Francis had decided to grant local ordinaries the right to give to a priest in good standing the faculty to preside at the marriage of followers of the society, immediately after which they will participate in a Mass celebrated by an SSPX priest, or, if no priest in good standing can receive the consent of the couple, to give the faculty instead to an SSPX priest. Previously, in 2008, the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei had stated: "The priests of the Society of St. Pius X are ... prohibited from exercising their priestly functions," going on to conclude that, in the case of matrimony, "these sacraments are invalid," since a suspended priest lacks the proper delegation from the bishop.[39]


On 20 November 2016, Pope Francis personally and indefinitely extended an allowance he created during the Holy Year of 2015, whereby penitents confessing to priests affiliated with the SSPX "shall validly and licitly receive the absolution of their sins."[40]

Ordination and Holy OrdersEdit

During an interview with TV Libertes on 29 January 2017, Bishop Fellay announced that theological discussions with the Holy See had led to permission for the society to licitly ordain priests: "This summer it was confirmed that the Superior General can freely ordain the priests of the society without having to ask permission from the local bishop."[41]


In 2020, Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy and dean of theology at the Regina Apostolorum university in Rome, reaffirmed the statement he made in 2011, before Pope Benedict granted certain faculties in favor of SSPX priests. After declaring that "the Masses celebrated by members of the Society of St. Pius X are valid but illicit, i.e., contrary to Canon Law", he said: "The mere fact of assisting at a Mass of this society is not a sin. It would only become so if a person attended this Mass with the deliberate intention of separating himself from communion with the Pope and those in communion with him. I would say, therefore, that a conscientious Catholic should not knowingly attend a Mass celebrated by a priest not in good standing with the Church." He added: "Only if there is objectively no alternative should one attend the Mass celebrated by a priest from the Society of St. Pius X. If one has to do so, then I would say that one may go in good conscience and receive Communion at such a Mass. It would also fulfill the Sunday obligation", and explained that "alternative" is not limited to "Mass in the extraordinary form": a Catholic who seeks this form but finds none available other than the SSPX celebration "should attend an ordinary form Mass or even any Eastern Catholic celebration so as to remain in full Catholic communion".[39][42]


When told by a journalist of InfoVaticana, a provider of religious information founded in Madrid in October 2013,[43] that what Pope Francis had decided in March 2017 was instead that, "from now on, the weddings celebrated by the priests from the FSSPX are going to be recognized," Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, who had not seen the actual document, remarked: "That is a very significant action of the Holy Father, and it also indicates that in some way there must be a reconciliation of the FSSPX because basically what the Pope is saying is that the priests in this society, when they witness marriages, are exercising jurisdiction in the Roman Catholic Church."[44] In reality, it is local ordinaries, not the society, that in the document are authorized, if they wish, to delegate jurisdiction to SSPX priests to assist canonically at some marriages.

The society's view is that, before Pope Francis's authorizations, their priests held "supplied" jurisdiction (power of governance) for confessions and marriages. They received this supplied jurisdiction by law and not "by delegation or by mandate of the Sovereign Pontiff or the diocesan bishops or of regularly appointed parish priests."[45][46][47]

Since the grants by Pope Francis, the society says that its priests have or can have ordinary jurisdiction for the sacraments of confession and marriage. It adds that, in cases where a diocesan bishop refuses to grant delegation for a marriage, SSPX priests can still use extraordinary jurisdiction.[48]

SSPX todayEdit

As of 22 April 2018,[49] the society had 637 priests present in 37 countries and active in 35 more, 772 Mass centers, 167 priories, 123 religious brothers, 200 religious sisters, 79 oblates, 204 seminarians in six seminaries, 56 pre-seminarians in three pre-seminaries, more than 100 schools, 7 nursing homes, 4 Carmelite convents, 19 Missionary Sisters of Kenya, and 2 university-level institutes. As of 2020, the society had 680 priests and 217 seminarians.[50]

The society is divided into two classes of territorial units called districts and autonomous houses, each headed by a superior. An autonomous house may become a district after three priories have been established within its jurisdiction.[51] The most recent organizational addition of the society is the Autonomous House of Central America and the Caribbean, formed from territory taken from the District of Mexico, erected on 1 October 2017. Over 120 (>20%) of the society's priests are stationed in the District of France.[52]

Currently, the society is sub-divided into 14 districts, and 5 autonomous houses:[53]

District, or Autonomous house Priories Chapels Schools Retreat centers
District of Africa 7 23 2
District of Asia 6 39 2
District of Australia (also Oceania) 7 38 4
District of Austria 4 16
District of Belgium-Netherlands 3 8 1
District of Canada 6 30 3 1
District of France 44 109 47 4
District of Germany 13 29 4 1
District of Great Britain
(also Scandinavia)
7 31 1
District of Italy 4 16 1
District of Mexico-Guatemala 6 20 2
District of South America 8 30 3
District of Switzerland 10 17 6 1
District of United States 20 103 26 3
Autonomous House of Brazil 3 12
Autonomous House of Eastern Europe 5 15 3 1
District of Ireland 2 5
Autonomous House of Spain and Portugal 1 17
Autonomous House of Central America and the Caribbean 1

The first seminary founded by the society (St. Pius X Seminary) is located in Écône, Switzerland. Its largest is located in the United States (St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary: Dillwyn, VA), and having outgrown its previous facilities, relocated in 2016 from Winona, Minnesota; the former seminary complex continues to house the novitiate of the religious brothers.[54] Other seminaries are located in France (Flavigny-sur-Ozerain), Germany (Zaitzkofen), Australia (Goulburn), and Argentina (La Reja). The society also runs pre-seminaries for prospective priestly vocations in Italy (Albano Laziale), and the Philippines (Santa Barbara).

If the society's canonical situation were to be regularized, it would be the Church's 4th largest society of apostolic life (similar to a religious order, but without vows), according to the three criteria published annually in Annuario Pontificio: number of erected houses (median 31; SSPX 167), number of members in the society (median 229; SSPX 971), and number of priests in the society (median 149; SSPX 640).[55]

Allies and supportersEdit

The SSPX has received explicit support from the following diocesan bishops:

Bishop Mayer resigned canonically on 20 August 1981; he later participated in the 1988 Écône consecrations, declaring "my presence here at this ceremony is a matter of conscience: It is the duty of a profession of the Catholic Faith before the entire Church."[56] After his retirement, Bishop Mayer founded the Priestly Union of St Jean-Marie Vianney,[57] which remained closely associated with the SSPX until 2001, when it reconciled with the Holy See.

The society now has close links with the Priestly Society of Saint Josaphat, led by Father Basil Kovpak, a priest formerly of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, who was definitively excommunicated from the Catholic Church in November 2007[58] after having Bishop Richard Williamson, then of the SSPX but expelled from the society five years later,[59] illicitly ordain two priests and seven deacons for his society in violation of canons 1015 §1 and 1017 of the Code of Canon Law.

In May 2019, the SSPX announced that Vitus Huonder, Bishop of Chur, Switzerland, as per a long stated intention, had retired to one of the society's houses in order "to dedicate himself to prayer and silence, to celebrate the traditional Mass exclusively, and to work for Tradition, the only way of renewing the Church."[60] He was warmly received by the SSPX: "The Society of Saint Pius X appreciates Bishop Huonder’s courageous decision and rejoices to be able to provide him with the spiritual and priestly surroundings that he desires so deeply. May this example be followed by others, so as to 'restore everything in Christ'."[60]

In a letter addressed on 1 September 2020 to Catholic Family News Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, former Secretary-General of the Vatican City State and former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, said that the work of the SSPX "deserves recognition for not having allowed the flame of Tradition to be extinguished at a moment in which celebrating the ancient Mass was considered subversive and a reason for excommunication. [...] If their fidelity made disobedience to the pope inevitable with the episcopal consecrations, thanks to them the Society was able to protect herself from the furious attack of the Innovators and by its very existence it allowed the possibility of the liberalization of the Ancient Rite, which until then was prohibited. Its presence also allowed the contradictions and errors of the conciliar sect to emerge, always winking at heretics and idolaters but implacably rigid and intolerant towards Catholic Truth."[61][62]

Several religious institutes, mostly based in France, are associated with the society. A specific article, SSPX-affiliated religious orders, is devoted to them.

Notable groups that have split from the SSPXEdit

There have been two major kinds of splits from the SSPX. Two notable splits of the first kind involved priests who viewed the SSPX as too liberal and who use the form that the Mass had before Pope John XXIII. The other kind involved groups who have reconciled with the Holy See and who, like the SSPX, use the 1962 edition of the Roman Missal.

Groups which broke with the SSPX and are not recognized by the Holy See include:

  • Society of Saint Pius V – In 1983, nine U.S. SSPX priests broke with or were forced to leave the SSPX's Northeast USA District partly because they were opposed to Lefebvre's instructions that Mass be celebrated according to the 1962 edition of the Roman Missal issued by Pope John XXIII. Those in SSPX circles refer to these priests as "the nine". They began their organization by refusing to complete a transaction of a church that the SSPX was attempting to purchase, using one of the nine priests as the buyer. The founding priests took the money intended for the purchase of the church and kept the church for themselves.[citation needed] A number of the SSPV's priests and the lay people who go to their Masses are openly sedevacantist, a thesis rejected by the SSPX. Other issues occasioning the split were: Lefebvre's order that Society priests must accept the decrees of nullity handed down by diocesan marriage tribunals; the insistence that all Society Masses be celebrated according to the 1962 edition of the Roman Missal; the acceptance of new members into the group who had been ordained to the priesthood according to the revised sacramental rites of Pope Paul VI.[63]
  • Istituto Mater Boni Consilii – (English: "Institute of the Mother of Good Counsel") is a traditionalist congregation of priests that follows the sedeprivationist school of thought. The founders of the institute seceded in 1985 from the Society of St. Pius X under the leadership of Fr. Francesco Ricossa, onetime faculty member of the seminary at Écône. In contrast to the North American-based SSPV, this Institute is based in Europe.

Groups which broke with the SSPX and reconciled with Rome include:

  • Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (FSSP) – It was established in 1988 after the Écône consecrations. Responding to the Holy See's declaration that these constituted a schismatic act and that those involved were thereby automatically excommunicated, twelve priests left the society and established the Fraternity, in full communion with the Holy See.
  • Institute of the Good Shepherd – (Institut du Bon-Pasteur, IBP) was established as a papally-recognised society of apostolic life on 8 September 2006 for a group of SSPX members who maintained it was time for the society to accept reconciliation with Pope Benedict XVI.

Lifestyle and clothing amongst adherentsEdit

In the Society of Saint Piux X, a complementarian position with respect to gender roles is upheld; "few married women work, especially once they have children."[64]

Richard Williamson, a former bishop of the SSPX who now aligns with the SSPX Resistance, wrote a pastoral letter, in which he stated that "women's trousers, as worn today, short or long, modest or immodest, tight or loose, open or disguised (like the "culottes"), are an assault upon woman's womanhood and so they represent a deep-lying revolt against the order willed by God."[65][66] The Atlantic, in covering SSPX, thus stated described their female adherents as being "Women in long, modest skirts [who were loading] vans that had enough seats to accommodate eight or nine kids".[64]



After Bishop Richard Williamson, the subject of the complaint by the Anti-Defamation League, denied the use of Nazi gas chambers to massacre Jews in a 2009 interview, the superior general of the society said that, if he repeated his denial, he would be expelled.[67] His actual expulsion in 2012 was for refusing to show due respect and obedience to the SSPX authorities and calling on the superior general to resign.[68] Williamson was later convicted of Holocaust denial by a German court.[69] The society condemns Nazism,[citation needed] following the principles in Pope Pius XI's 1937 encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, which explicitly denounces Nazi principles and policies[70] and "condemns racial theories and the mistreatment of people because of their race or nationality but does not refer to Hitler or the Nazis by name".[71]

The society publishes in its magazine The Angelus a collection of quotations praising Pius XII for his work in saving Jews from Nazi persecution[72] and in condemning Nazi principles.

French Nazi collaborator and war criminal Paul Touvier was arrested in an SSPX priory. The superiors of the priory had granted him asylum as "an act of charity to a homeless man".[citation needed] They had no knowledge about the man's background when he first appeared in the priory, and Touvier was indeed homeless at the time. On his death, in 1996, an SSPX Requiem Mass was offered for his soul, upon his request.[73][74]

On 16 October 2013, the society offered to perform a funeral for Nazi war criminal Erich Priebke. Priebke had been baptized in a Protestant denomination, but in post-war years he converted to a form of Catholicism with his wife and had his children baptized.[75] He rejected the cult of race as a "mistake that led down a path of no return."[75] Despite all of that the ceremony did not take place due to protests by some 500 people, mostly unaware of the circumstances of his personal life, outside the society's Italian district house in Albano, near Rome. The local authorities of the Catholic Church had refused him a public funeral, citing a rule of canon law that, unless they gave some signs of repentance before death, a public funeral must be refused to manifest sinners to whom it cannot be granted without public scandal of the faithful.[76][77]

In spite of controversies surrounding Nazism, the society mentioned that Archbishop Lefebvre's own father, René Lefebvre, met his death in the concentration camp at Sonnenburg in February 1944, three years after his arrest by the Gestapo; he died, "his rosary in hand, a victim of Nazi insanity."[78]

Alleged cover-up of abuseEdit

On 5 April 2017, Uppdrag granskning, a Swedish television program focused on investigative journalism, alleged that four members of the SSPX—three priests and a former seminarian—had molested at least a dozen young people in several countries.[79][80][81] The program also stated that evidence of abuse was kept secret by the SSPX and that the priests were allowed to continue in ministry.[79][82] Nonetheless, three of the four had been expelled from the society by the time that the program was aired.

Kevin Gerard Sloniker, the former seminarian and the only person accused by name in the program, was expelled from the society's St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in 2005, and began serving a life-sentence in 2015.[83][84] The remaining three accusations regard priests whose names have been withheld (referred to in the program as Fathers P, S, and M); their accusers have likewise remained anonymous. Nonetheless, P was the subject of a canonical trial presided over by Bishop Fellay, authorized by the Holy See in 2013; he was found guilty, and subsequently ordered to retire to a monastery. Crux reports "P refused to go and, according to officials of the SSPX, joined [Bishop] Williamson's Resistance."[85] He along with "Father S" were expelled from the society, and are now affiliated with Williamson's group. "Father M" is currently serving in France, though no criminal charges have been brought against him and the society denies that they are aware of any credible accusations of abuse against the priest.

In May 2020, the Kansas Bureau of Investigation stated that, as part of its investigation into the four Catholic dioceses in the state, it was also investigating accusations that SSPX members were either perpetrating or covering up clerical sex abuse in the state.[86] The SSPX St. Mary's Rectory in Kansas faced sex abuse allegations.[87]

Priests sentenced for abuseEdit

Mexican SSPX priest and former headmaster Fr. Uribe Silviano Bernabé was sentenced in September 2004 by a Bordeaux criminal court to one year for sexual assaults on an adult woman and a 13-year-old girl.[88] He appealed the sentence and lost on 17 March 2005.[89] He then brought the case to the Court of Cassation in Paris, which upheld the sentence on 26 April 2006.[90]

On 13 December 2017, Fr. Frédéric Abbet was sentenced to 5 years by a Brussels appeal court for sexual abuse on a young boy in an SSPX boarding school. He had already faced accusations in his native Switzerland in 2005 but had been acquitted by an unofficial SSPX tribunal.[91][92] Fr. Abbet was to serve the prison sentence in his native Switzerland; where it was later discovered he never did serve his prison sentence but instead lived freely in the community.[93]

On 16 February 2018, former school headmaster Fr. Christophe Roisnel was sentenced to 19 years by the Nanterre criminal court of appeal for multiple counts of rape and acts of torture on female school teachers.[94][95]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ "Statistiques de la FSSPX". La Porte Latine (in French). Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  2. ^ Knittel, Francois (April 2004). "Pascendi exposes Modernist tactics". The Angelus. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  3. ^ "New Superior of the SSPX — Father Davide Pagliarini". 11 July 2018. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  4. ^ Ridley, Charles (16 June 1988). "Vatican threatens dissident priest with excommunication". UPI. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  5. ^ Office of Congregation for Bishops; Bernardinus, Card. Gantin (1 July 1988). "Decree of Excomunication of Archbishop Lefebvre". EWTN. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  6. ^ "Pope Benedict lifts excommunication of bishops ordained by Lefebvre". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  7. ^ "Apostolic Letter Misericordia et misera (20 November 2016) | Francis". Retrieved 4 April 2017.
  8. ^ "Letter of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei" to the Ordinaries of the Episcopal Conferences concerned on the faculties for the celebration of marriages of the faithful of the Society Saint Pius X, 04.04.2017". Retrieved 22 September 2018.
  9. ^ "Warning: An SSPX Priest Is Incapable of Absolving You from Sin". Retrieved 4 April 2017.
  10. ^ "Vatican names Bishop Fellay to hear canonical charge against SSPX priest, despite bishop's suspension: News Headlines". Retrieved 4 April 2017.
  11. ^
  12. ^ The Wanderer Interviews Fr. Aulagnier, SSPX, Luc Gagnon, 18 September 2003
  13. ^ a b c "Short History Of The Society Of Saint Pius X". Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  14. ^ a b " Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre: chp 2: A New Apostolate". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  15. ^ " Apologia pro Marcel Lefebvre: Chapter 4: The Campaign Against Econe". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  16. ^
  17. ^ "Archbishop Lefebvre was told that this examination was very positive and that he just had to come to Rome and clarify some questions."Conference of Father Franz Schmidberger, superior general of the Society of St. Pius X at Rockdale, Sydney, Australia, 16 October 1990, by Father Gerard Hogan and Father François Laisney
  18. ^ The 1974 Declaration of Archbishop Lefebvre,21 November 1974
  19. ^ Nos igitur iterum adhortamur hos Nostros fratres ac filios, eosque exoramus, ut conscii fiant gravium vulnerum quae secus Ecclesiae illaturi sunt. Invitationem ipsis iteramus, ut secum recogitent gravia Christi monita de Ecclesiae unitate (Cfr. Io. 17, 21 ss.) ac de oboedientia erga legitimum Pastorem, ab Ipso universo gregi praepositum, cum signum oboedientiae sit quae Patri ac Filio debetur (Cfr. Luc. 10, 16). Nos eos aperto corde exspectamus apertisque bracchiis ad eos prompte amplectendos: utinam humilitatis exemplum praebentes, ad gaudium Populi Dei rursus viam unitatis et amoris ingredi valeant! (Consistory for the creation of twenty new cardinals, 24 May 1976)
  20. ^ a b c d Vere, Peter John (September 1999). A Canonical History of the Lefebvrite Schism. Ontario, Canada: Saint Paul University. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  21. ^ Text given in English translation in M. Davies, Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre, p. 194
  22. ^ English translation in M. Davies, Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre, p. 197-199
  23. ^ "The Ordinations of 29 June 1976". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  24. ^ English translation of the statement in M. Davies, Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre, pp. 215-216
  25. ^ "The situation is such, the work placed in our hands by the good Lord is such, that faced with this darkness in Rome, faced with the Roman authorities' pertinacity in error, faced with this refusal to return to truth or tradition on the part of those who occupy the seats of authority in Rome, faced with all these things, it seems to us that the good Lord is asking for the Church to continue. This is why it is likely that before I give account of my life to the good Lord, I shall have to consecrate some bishops" (Sermon on 29 June 1987)
  26. ^ "No bishop is permitted to consecrate anyone a bishop unless it is first evident that there is a pontifical mandate" (Code of Canon Law, canon 1013)
  27. ^ "A bishop who consecrates someone a bishop without a pontifical mandate and the person who receives the consecration from him incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See" (Code of Canon Law, canon 1382).
  28. ^ (Encyclical Ad Apostolorum Principis, 41)
  29. ^ "Decree of excommunication on Marcel Lefebvre". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  30. ^ "Ecclesia Dei (July 2, 1988) | John Paul II". Archived from the original on 29 January 2015.
  31. ^ "Code of Canon Law". Archived from the original on 20 February 2008.
  32. ^ "Code of Canon Law - IntraText". Retrieved 9 December 2016.
  33. ^ "Code of Canon Law - IntraText". Archived from the original on 24 December 2007.
  34. ^ "Interview with Bp. Bernard Fellay".
  35. ^ "Vatican official confirms: agreement with SSPX is close : News Headlines". Retrieved 29 March 2017.
  36. ^ "New pastoral provisions for Sacrament of Marriage for SSPX". Retrieved 22 April 2017.
  37. ^ "Conservative Theologians Accuse Pope of Spreading Heresy". New York Times. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
  38. ^ Knittel, Francois (November–December 2017). "Canon Law and Pastoral Theology of Marriage". The Angelus. 40: 77–82.
  39. ^ a b "SSPX Masses:Limited Progress Toward Reconciliation". 17 March 2020.
  40. ^ "Letter".
  41. ^ "SSPX Bishops Authorized to Ordain Priests Without Permission of Local Bishops".
  42. ^ "Mass with the Society of St. Pius X". 21 June 2011.
  43. ^ "INFOVATICANA SL, MADRID - Informe comercial, de riesgo, financiero y mercantil".
  44. ^ "Burke: 'There is a very dangerous confusion and also with the confusion come divisions'". Infovaticana. 10 April 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2017.
  45. ^ de Mallerais, Tissier. "Supplied jurisdiction & traditional priests". Society of Saint Pius X, United States District. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  46. ^ SSPX. "Do SSPX Priests Have Jurisdiction". Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  47. ^ Fr Ramon Angles. "Validity of SSPX Confessions and Marriages". Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  48. ^ "SSPX Marriages are Incontestable - District of the USA". 11 April 2017. Retrieved 20 April 2017.
  49. ^ FSSPX, District de France. "Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie X - FSSPX - SSPX - La Porte Latine - Catholiques de Tradition - Mgr Lefebvre - Mgr Fellay - Quelques statistiques au sujet de la Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie X". Retrieved 28 April 2017.
  50. ^ "Statistiques de la FSSPX • La Porte Latine". La Porte Latine (in French). Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  51. ^ "Autonomous Houses - General House". 17 November 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
  52. ^ Figure given by the SSPX's French District.
  53. ^ "The districts of the SSPX worldwide". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  54. ^ "A New Future for Winona & Moving Day! - St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary". 27 October 2016. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
  55. ^ Annuario Pontificio, 2016. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2016. pp. 1467–1476.
  56. ^ Mayer, Castro (1993). "Declaration". Is Tradition Excommunicated?: 95–96.
  57. ^ "Nossa pequena história dentro da história da Igreja". Archived from the original on 16 July 2011.
  58. ^ "Catholic News". Retrieved 21 August 2015.
  59. ^ Cindy Wooden, "SSPX expels Bishop Williamson, who opposed talks with Vatican" in Catholic News Service, 24 October 2012 at the Library of Congress Web Archives (archived 5 December 2012)
  60. ^ a b "Joint communiqué of Bishop Huonder and Father Pagliarani". FSSPX.Actualités / FSSPX.News. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  61. ^ "Vigano Letter – September 1, 2020". Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  62. ^ Uncategorized, 2 Settembre 2020 | (2 September 2020). "Mons. Viganò elogia la Fraternità S. Pio X: "Mons. Lefebvre fu confessore esemplare della Fede"". Radio Spada (in Italian). Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  63. ^ Additional objections can be found at the "anti-Vatican II" Traditional Mass Organisation's website
  64. ^ a b Green, Emma (2020). "The Christian Withdrawal Experiment". The Atlantic. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
  65. ^ Richard Williamson (1 September 1991). "Bishop Williamson's Letters". Archived from the original on 18 May 2002. Retrieved 10 November 2020.
  66. ^ Barber, Tony (3 February 2009). "Bishop Williamson takes aim at women's trousers and 'The Sound of Music'". Financial Times. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
  67. ^ "Bishop Fellay to Expel Bishop Williamson if He Denies Holocaust Again".
  68. ^ "Bishop Williamson Ousted from SSPX".
  69. ^ "German court convicts British Holocaust-denying bishop", Haaretz/Associated Press, 16 January 2013
  70. ^ "Mit brennender Sorge (March 14, 1937) | PIUS XI".
  71. ^ "Pius XII | Biography, Papacy, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica.
  72. ^ "Defender of the Jews: Pius XII - District of the USA". 16 October 2013.
  73. ^ "Vade retro Soutanas", Libération, 11 October 2006, the title of the article being a play on the phrase spoken by Jesus to Peter in the Vulgate Gospel of Mark 8:33: vade retro me satana ("Get behind me, Satan!)" but replacing "Satan" with "Soutane".
  74. ^ "Lefebvre movement: long, troubled history with Judaism", National Catholic Reporter, 26 January 2009
  75. ^ a b Erich Priebke, Autobiografia (Rome: Associazione uomo e liberta, 2003), 150, 160, 161, 170.
  76. ^ "Nazi war criminal's SSPX funeral stopped by protests" by Cindy Wooden, Catholic News Service,16 October 2013,
  77. ^ "Code of Canon Law - IntraText". Retrieved 9 December 2016.
  78. ^ "Founder: Priest and Missionary".
  79. ^ a b "SSPX accused of abuse cover-up : News Headlines".
  80. ^ "New cover-ups of assaults by Catholic priests". SVT Nyheter Gransking. 5 April 2017. Retrieved 16 October 2018.
  81. ^ "Pope helped SSPX after scandal with Holocaust-denying bishop". SVT Nyheter. 5 April 2017. Retrieved 16 October 2018.
  82. ^ (SVT1), Mathieu Martiniere, Mathieu Périsse, Daphné Gastaldi (We report) et Ali Fegan. "The hidden sex abuse cases at a Franco-Swiss Catholic priest fraternity".
  83. ^ "Former Seminarian for Anti-Semitic Church Charged with Sexual Abuse of Boys". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  84. ^ "Trucker who molested boys from his church will spend at least 35 years in prison". Retrieved 8 April 2017.
  85. ^ "Report charges cover-up of sexual abuse by traditionalist society". 5 April 2017.
  86. ^ Hadro, Matt. "Kansas investigating sexual abuse claims in breakaway Society of St. Pius X". Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  87. ^ Judy L. Thomas, "KBI is investigating priests in Kansas town that draws parishioners from across U.S." in The Kansas City Star, 17 May 2020
  88. ^ "EU considera pedófilos a dos curas que ofician en México". (in Spanish). Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  89. ^ "VIOLS Un prêtre intégriste poursuivi pour agressions sexuelles" (in French). Retrieved 25 October 2018.
  90. ^ Cour de Cassation, Chambre criminelle, du 26 avril 2006, 05-84.841, Inédit, retrieved 25 October 2018
  91. ^ "Swiss priest convicted of sexual abuse at Belgian school". 14 December 2017.
  92. ^ "Pédophilie: un prêtre valaisan de la FSSPX condamné en Belgique -". (in French). Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  93. ^ "Paedophile priest found free in Switzerland after conviction in Belgium". The Brussels Times. 15 June 2020. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  94. ^ (17 February 2018). "Un abbé intégriste condamné à 19 ans de réclusion en appel pour viols". La Croix (in French). Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  95. ^ "SSPX priest indicted on charges of rape, torture : News Headlines". Retrieved 19 September 2018.

External linksEdit