Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Positive psychology is "the scientific study of what makes life most worth living,"[1] or "the scientific study of positive human functioning and flourishing on multiple levels that include the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life".[2] Positive psychology is concerned with eudaimonia, "the good life", reflection about what holds the greatest value in life – the factors that contribute the most to a well-lived and fulfilling life.

Positive psychology began as a new domain of psychology in 1998 when Martin Seligman chose it as the theme for his term as president of the American Psychological Association.[3][4] Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi and Christopher Peterson are regarded as co-initiators of this development.[5] It is a reaction against psycho-analysis and behaviorism, which have focused on "mental illness", meanwhile emphasising maladaptive behavior and negative thinking. It builds further on the humanistic movement, which encouraged an emphasis on happiness, well-being, and positivity, thus creating the foundation for what is now known as positive psychology.[4]

Guiding theories are Seligman's P.E.R.M.A., and Csikszentmihalyi's theory of flow, while Seligman and Peterson's Character Strengths and Virtues was a major contribution to the methodological study of positive psychology.

Positive psychologists have suggested a number of ways in which individual happiness may be fostered. Social ties with a spouse, family, friends and wider networks through work, clubs or social organisations are of particular importance, while physical exercise and the practice of meditation may also contribute to happiness. Happiness may rise with increasing financial income, though it may plateau or even fall when no further gains are made.[6]

Contents

Definition and basic assumptionsEdit

DefinitionEdit

Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi define positive psychology as

... the scientific study of positive human functioning and flourishing on multiple levels that include the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life.[2]

Christopher peterson defines positive psychology as

...the scientific study of what makes life most worth living,"[1]

Basic conceptsEdit

Positive psychology is concerned with eudaimonia, "the good life" or flourishing, living according to what holds the greatest value in life – the factors that contribute the most to a well-lived and fulfilling life. While not attempting a strict definition of the good life, positive psychologists agree that one must live a happy, engaged, and meaningful life in order to experience "the good life." Martin Seligman referred to "the good life" as "using your signature strengths every day to produce authentic happiness and abundant gratification".[7] According to Christopher Peterson, "eudaimonia trumps hedonism".[1]

Related concepts are happiness, well-being, quality of life, contentment,[8] and meaningful life.

Research topicsEdit

According to Seligman and Peterson, positive psychology is concerned with three issues: positive emotions, positive individual traits, and positive institutions. Positive emotions are concerned with being content with one's past, being happy in the present and having hope for the future. Positive individual traits focus on one's strengths and virtues. Finally, positive institutions are based on strengths to better a community of people.[9]

According to Peterson, positive psychologists are concerned with four topics: (1) positive experiences, (2) enduring psychological traits, (3) positive relationships, and (4) positive institutions.[10] According to Peterson, topics of interest to researchers in the field are: states of pleasure or flow, values, strengths, virtues, talents, as well as the ways that these can be promoted by social systems and institutions.[11]

Basic assumptionsEdit

Positive psychology complements, without intending to replace or ignore, the traditional areas of psychology. By emphasizing the study of positive human development this field helps to balance other approaches that focus on disorder, and which may produce only limited understanding.[12]

The basic premise of positive psychology is that human beings are often drawn by the future more than they are driven by the past. A change in our orientation to time can dramatically affect how we think about the nature of happiness. Seligman identified other possible goals: families and schools that allow children to grow, workplaces that aim for satisfaction and high productivity, and teaching others about positive psychology.[9]

Those who practice positive psychology attempt psychological interventions that foster positive attitudes toward one's subjective experiences, individual traits, and life events.[13] The goal is to minimize pathological thoughts that may arise in a hopeless mindset, and to, instead, develop a sense of optimism toward life.[13]

Origins and developmentEdit

 
To Martin Seligman, psychology (particularly its positive branch) can investigate and promote realistic ways of fostering more well-being in individuals and communities.

OriginEdit

Positive psychology began as a new area of psychology in 1998 when Martin Seligman chose it as the theme for his term as president of the American Psychological Association.[3] In the first sentence of his book Authentic Happiness, Seligman claimed: "for the last half century psychology has been consumed with a single topic only – mental illness",[14]:xi expanding on Maslow’s comments.[15] He urged psychologists to continue the earlier missions of psychology of nurturing talent and improving normal life.[16]

The term originates with Maslow, in his 1954 book Motivation and Personality,[17] and there have been indications that psychologists since the 1950s have been increasingly focused on the promotion of mental health rather than merely treating illness.[18][19]

DevelopmentEdit

The first positive psychology summit took place in 1999. The First International Conference on Positive Psychology took place in 2002.[16] More attention was given by the general public in 2006 when, using the same framework, a course at Harvard University became particularly popular.[20] In June 2009, the First World Congress on Positive Psychology took place at the University of Pennsylvania.[21]

The International Positive Psychology Association (IPPA) is a recently established association that has expanded to thousands of members from 80 different countries. The IPPA's missions include: (1) "further the science of positive psychology across the globe and to ensure that the field continues to rest on this science" (2) "work for the effective and responsible application of positive psychology in diverse areas such as organizational psychology, counselling and clinical psychology, business, health, education, and coaching", (3) "foster education and training in the field".[22]

The field of positive psychology today is most advanced in the United States and Western Europe. Even though positive psychology offers a new approach to the study of positive emotions and behavior, the ideas, theories, research, and motivation to study the positive side of human behavior is as old as humanity.[23]

Historical antecedentsEdit

Positive psychology is the latest effort by human beings to understand the nature of happiness and well-being, but it is by no means the first attempt to solve that particular puzzle.

Religion and philosophyEdit

 
5 steps to a happier life. Infographic based on Haidt, Jonathan (2005). The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York: Basic Books

Judaism has a 3,000-year tradition of wisdom regarding happiness.[16][24][25] It also promotes a Divine command theory of happiness: happiness and rewards follow from following the commands of the divine. The Early Hebrews believed in the divine command theory which finds happiness by living according to the commands or rules set down by a Supreme Being.[26]

The Greeks thought that happiness could be discovered through logic and intellectual contemplation. The ancient Greeks had many schools of thought. Socrates advocated self-knowledge as the path to happiness. Plato's allegory of the cave influenced western thinkers who believed that happiness is found by finding deeper meaning. Aristotle believed happiness, or eudaimonia is constituted by rational activity in accordance with virtue over a complete life. The Epicureans believed in reaching happiness through the enjoyment of simple pleasures. The Stoics believed they could remain happy by being objective and reasonable, and described many "spiritual exercises" comparable to the psychological exercises employed in cognitive behavioral therapy and positive psychology.[16][27]

Christianity continued to follow the Divine command theory of happiness. In the Middle Ages, Christianity taught that true happiness would not be found until the afterlife. The seven deadly sins are about earthly self-indulgence and narcissism. On the other hand, the Four Cardinal Virtues and Three Theological Virtues were supposed to keep one from sin.[16]

Modern AgeEdit

During the Renaissance and Age of Enlightenment, individualism was valued. Simultaneously, creative individuals gained prestige, as they were now considered artists, not just craftsmen. Utilitarian philosophers such as John Stuart Mill believed moral actions were actions that maximized happiness for the most number of people; they suggested an empirical science of happiness should be used to determine which actions are moral (a science of morality). Thomas Jefferson and other proponents of democracy believed "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are inalienable rights, and violation of these justifies the overthrow of the government.[16]

The Romantics valued individual emotional expression and sought their emotional "true selves," which were unhindered by social norms. At the same time, love and intimacy became main motivations for marriage.[16]

PsychologyEdit

Several humanistic psychologists, most notably Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, and Erich Fromm, developed theories and practices pertaining to human happiness and flourishing. More recently, positive psychologists have found empirical support for the humanistic theories of flourishing. In addition, positive psychology has moved ahead in a variety of new directions.

In 1984, Diener published his tripartite model of subjective well-being, positing "three distinct but often related components of wellbeing: frequent positive affect, infrequent negative affect, and cognitive evaluations such as life satisfaction."[28] In this model, cognitive, affective and contextual factors contribute to subjective well-being.[29] According to Diener and Suh, subjective well-being is "...based on the idea that how each person thinks and feels about his or her life is important."[30]

Carol Ryff's Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being was initially published in 1989, and additional testing of its factors was published in 1995. It postulates six factors which are key for well-being, namely self-acceptance, personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, autonomy, and positive relations with others.[31]

According to Corey Keyes, who collaborated with Carol Ryff and uses the term flourishing as a central concept, mental well-being has three components, namely hedonic (c.q. subjective or emotional[32]), psychological, and social well-being.[33] Hedonic well-being concerns emotional aspects of well-being, whereas psychological and social well-being, c.q eudaimonic well-being, concerns skills, abilities, and optimal functioning.[34] This tripartite model of mental well-being has received extensive empirical support across cultures.[34][32][35][36]

Theory and methodsEdit

FlowEdit

In the 1970s Csikszentmihalyi's started to study flow, a state of absorption where one's abilities are well-matched to the demands at-hand. Flow is characterized by intense concentration, loss of self-awareness, a feeling of being perfectly challenged (neither bored nor overwhelmed), and a sense "time is flying." Flow is intrinsically rewarding; it can also assist in the achievement of goals (e.g., winning a game) or improving skills (e.g., becoming a better chess player).[37] Anyone can experience flow, in different domains, such as play, creativity, and work.

Flow is achieved when the challenge of the situation meets one's personal abilities. A mismatch of challenge for someone of low skills results in a state of anxiety; insufficient challenge for someone highly skilled results in boredom.[37] The effect of challenging situations means that flow is often temporarily exciting and variously stressful, but this is considered Eustress, which is also known as "good" stress. Eustress is arguably less harmful than chronic stress, although the pathways of stress-related systems are similar. Both can create a "wear and tear" effect; however, the differing physiological elements and added psychological benefits of eustress might well balance any wear and tear experienced.

Csikszentmihalyi identified nine indicator elements of flow: 1. Clear goals exist every step of the way, 2. Immediate feedback guides one's action, 3. There is a balance between challenges and abilities, 4. Action and awareness are merged, 5. Distractions are excluded from consciousness, 6. Failure is not worrisome, 7. Self-consciousness disappears, 8. Sense of time is distorted, and 9. The activity becomes "autotelic" (an end in itself, done for its own sake)[38] His studies also show that flow is greater during work while happiness is greater during leisure activities.[39]

PERMAEdit

Initial theory: three paths to happinessEdit

In Authentic Happiness (2002) Seligman proposed three kinds of a happy life which can be investigated:[40][41]

  1. Pleasant life: research into the Pleasant Life, or the "life of enjoyment", examines how people optimally experience, forecast, and savor the positive feelings and emotions that are part of normal and healthy living (e.g., relationships, hobbies, interests, entertainment, etc.). Despite the attention given, Martin Seligman says this most transient element of happiness may be the least important.[42]
  2. Good Life: investigation of the beneficial effects of immersion, absorption, and flow, felt by individuals when optimally engaged with their primary activities, is the study of the Good Life, or the "life of engagement". Flow is experienced when there is a positive match between a person's strength and their current task, i.e., when one feels confident of accomplishing a chosen or assigned task.[note 1]
  3. Meaningful Life: inquiry into the Meaningful Life, or "life of affiliation", questions how individuals derive a positive sense of well-being, belonging, meaning, and purpose from being part of and contributing back to something larger and more permanent than themselves (e.g., nature, social groups, organizations, movements, traditions, belief systems).

These categories appear neither widely disputed nor adopted by researchers across the 12 years that this academic area has been in existence.

Development into PERMA-theoryEdit

 
Simple exercise, such as running, is cited as key to feeling happy.[43]

In Flourish (2011) Seligman argued that the last category, "meaningful life", can be considered as 3 different categories. The resulting acronym is PERMA: Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning and purpose, and Accomplishments. It is a mnemonic for the five elements of Martin Seligman's well-being theory:[41][44]

  • Positive emotions include a wide range of feelings, not just happiness and joy.[45] Included are emotions like excitement, satisfaction, pride and awe, amongst others. These emotions are frequently seen as connected to positive outcomes, such as longer life and healthier social relationships.[46]
  • Engagement refers to involvement in activities that draws and builds upon one's interests. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi explains true engagement as flow, a feeling of intensity that leads to a sense of ecstasy and clarity.[47] The task being done needs to call upon higher skill and be a bit difficult and challenging yet still possible. Engagement involves passion for and concentration on the task at hand and is assessed subjectively as to whether the person engaged was completely absorbed, losing self-consciousness.[45]
  • Relationships are all important in fueling positive emotions, whether they are work-related, familial, romantic, or platonic. As Dr. Christopher Peterson puts it simply, "Other people matter."[48] Humans receive, share, and spread positivity to others through relationships. They are important not only in bad times, but good times as well. In fact, relationships can be strengthened by reacting to one another positively. It is typical that most positive things take place in the presence of other people.[49]
  • Meaning is also known as purpose, and prompts the question of "why". Discovering and figuring out a clear "why" puts everything into context from work to relationships to other parts of life.[50][51] Finding meaning is learning that there is something greater than one's self. Despite potential challenges, working with meaning drives people to continue striving for a desirable goal.
  • Accomplishments are the pursuit of success and mastery.[45] Unlike the other parts of PERMA, they are sometimes pursued even when accomplishments do not result in positive emotions, meaning, or relationships. That being noted, accomplishments can activate the other elements of PERMA, such as pride, under positive emotion.[52] Accomplishments can be individual or community-based, fun- or work-based.

Selection-criteriaEdit

The five PERMA elements were selected according to three criteria:

  1. It contributes to well-being.
  2. It is pursued for its own sake.
  3. It is defined and measured independently of the other elements.

Alternate theories on well-beingEdit

Although intended as comprehensive theory on well-being, Seligmann's model competes with older models of well-being, such as Carol Ryff's Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being and Diener's tripartite model of subjective well-being. Due to the existing investments in theory and research into these models, Seligmann's model has not become the "golden standard" of well-being research.[41]

Character Strengths and VirtuesEdit

The development of the Character Strengths and Virtues (CSV) handbook (2004) represented the first attempt by Seligman and Peterson to identify and classify positive psychological traits of human beings. Much like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) of general psychology, the CSV provided a theoretical framework to assist in understanding strengths and virtues and for developing practical applications for positive psychology. This manual identified 6 classes of virtues (i.e., "core virtues"), underlying 24 measurable character strengths.[53]

The CSV suggested these 6 virtues have a historical basis in the vast majority of cultures; in addition, these virtues and strengths can lead to increased happiness when built upon. Notwithstanding numerous cautions and caveats, this suggestion of universality hints threefold: 1. The study of positive human qualities broadens the scope of psychological research to include mental wellness, 2. the leaders of the positive psychology movement are challenging moral relativism, suggesting people are "evolutionarily predisposed" toward certain virtues, and 3. virtue has a biological basis.[53]:51

The organization of the 6 virtues and 24 strengths is as follows:

  1. Wisdom and Knowledge: creativity, curiosity, open-mindedness, love of learning, perspective, innovation
  2. Courage: bravery, persistence, integrity, vitality, zest
  3. Humanity: love, kindness, social intelligence
  4. Justice: citizenship, fairness, leadership
  5. Temperance: forgiveness and mercy, humility, prudence, self control
  6. Transcendence: appreciation of beauty and excellence, gratitude, hope, humor, spirituality

Recent research challenged the need for 6 virtues. Instead, researchers suggested the 24 strengths are more accurately grouped into just 3 or 4 categories: Intellectual Strengths, Interpersonal Strengths, and Temperance Strengths[54] or alternatively, Interpersonal Strengths, Fortitude, Vitality, and Cautiousness[55] These strengths, and their classifications, have emerged independently elsewhere in literature on values. Paul Thagard described examples; these included Jeff Shrager's workshops to discover the habits of highly creative people.[56] Some research indicates that well-being effects that appear to be due to spirituality are actually better described as due to virtue.[57]

Applications and research findingsEdit

Research on positive psychology, well-being, eudaimonia and happiness, and the theories of Diener, Ryff, Keyes and Seligmann covers a broad range of levels and topics, including "the biological, personal, relational, institutional, cultural, and global dimensions of life."[2]

CriticismEdit

According to Kirk Schneider, positive psychology fails to explain past heinous behaviors such as those perpetrated by the Nazi party, Stalinist marches, Klan gatherings, to identify but a few. Furthermore, Schneider pointed to a body of research showing high positivity correlates with positive illusion, which effectively distorts reality.[58] The extent of the downfall of high positivity (also known as flourishing) is one could become incapable of psychological growth, unable to self-reflect, and tend to hold racial biases. By contrast, negativity, sometimes evidenced in mild to moderate depression, is correlated with less distortion of reality. Therefore, negativity might play an important role within the dynamics of human flourishing. To illustrate, conflict engagement and acknowledgement of appropriate negativity, including certain negative emotions like guilt, might better promote flourishing.[59] Overall, Schneider provided perspective: "perhaps genuine happiness is not something you aim at, but is a by-product of a life well lived, and a life well lived does not settle on the programmed or neatly calibrated".[60] Seligman has acknowledged in his work the point about positive illusion,[61] and is also a critic of merely feeling good about oneself apart from reality and recognises the importance of negativity / dysphoria.[62]

Ian Sample, writing for The Guardian, noted that, "Positive psychologists also stand accused of burying their heads in the sand and ignoring that depressed, even merely unhappy people, have real problems that need dealing with." Sample also quoted Steven Wolin, a clinical psychiatrist at George Washington University, as saying that the study of positive psychology is just a reiteration of older ways of thinking, and that there is not much scientific research to support the efficacy of this method.[63] Gable responds to criticism on their pollyanna view on the world by saying that they are just bringing a balance to a side of psychology that is glaringly understudied.[64]

Barbara Held argued that while positive psychology makes contributions to the field of psychology, it has its faults. She offered insight into topics including the negative side effects of positive psychology, negativity within the positive psychology movement, and the current division in the field of psychology caused by differing opinions of psychologists on positive psychology. In addition, she noted the movement's lack of consistency regarding the role of negativity. She also raised issues with the simplistic approach taken by some psychologists in the application of positive psychology. A "one size fits all" approach is not arguably beneficial to the advancement of the field of positive psychology; she suggested a need for individual differences to be incorporated into its application.[65]

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ See related concepts: Self-efficacy and play.

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b c Christopher Peterson (2008), What Is Positive Psychology, and What Is It Not?
  2. ^ a b c Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi 2000.
  3. ^ a b "Time Magazine's cover story in the special issue on "The Science of Happiness", 2005" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-02-07. 
  4. ^ a b Srinivasan, T. S. (2015, February 12). The 5 Founding Fathers and A History of Positive Psychology. Retrieved February 4, 2017, from https://positivepsychologyprogram.com/founding-fathers/
  5. ^ The 5 Founding Fathers and A History of Positive Psychology
  6. ^ Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions. Seligman, Martin E. P.; Steen, Tracy A.; Park, Nansook; Peterson, Christopher American Psychologist, Vol 60(5), Jul-Aug 2005, 410-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
  7. ^ Seligman, M.E.P. (2009). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press.
  8. ^ Graham, Michael C. (2014). Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment. Outskirts Press. pp. 6–10. ISBN 978-1-4787-2259-5. 
  9. ^ a b Seligman, Martin E.P. "Positive Psychology Center." Positive Psychology Center. University of Pennsylvania, 2007. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.
  10. ^ Peterson, C. (2009). Positive Psychology. Reclaiming Children and Youth. Vol.18, Issue 2, pp. 3–7.
  11. ^ Peterson, Christopher (27 July 2006). A Primer in Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518833-2. 
  12. ^ Peterson, C (2009). "Positive psychology". Reclaiming Children and Youth. 18 (2): 3–7. 
  13. ^ a b Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction (pp. 279-298). Springer Netherlands.
  14. ^ Seligman, Martin E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-2297-0. 
  15. ^ "The science of psychology has been far more successful on the negative than on the positive side. It has revealed to us much about man’s shortcomings, his illness, his sins, but little about his potentialities, his virtues, his achievable aspirations, or his full psychological height. It is as if psychology has voluntarily restricted itself to only half its rightful jurisdiction, the darker, meaner half" (Maslow, Motivation and Psychology, p. 354).
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Compton, William C (2005). "1". An Introduction to Positive Psychology. Wadsworth Publishing. pp. 1–22. ISBN 0-534-64453-8. 
  17. ^ Note: the last chapter is entitled "Toward a Positive Psychology".
  18. ^ Secker J (1998). "Current conceptualizations of mental health and mental health promotion" (PDF). 13 (1). Health Education Research. p. 58. Retrieved 2010-05-18. ... Amongst psychologists ... the importance of promoting health rather than simply preventing ill-health date back to the 1950s (Jahoda, 1958) 
  19. ^ Dianne Hales (2010). "An Invitation to Health, Brief: Psychological Well-Being" (2010–2011 ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 26. Retrieved 2010-05-18. 
  20. ^ Ben-Shahar, Ben (2007) "Happier -Learn the Secrets to Daily Joy and Lasting Fulfillment", First Edition, McGraw-Hill Co.
  21. ^ Reuters, Jun 18, 2009: First World Congress on Positive Psychology Kicks Off Today With Talks by Two of the World's Most Renowned Psychologists
  22. ^ International Positive Psychology Association (IPPA) (2011). international positive psychology association. Retrieved from http://www.ippanetwork.org/about_ippa/
  23. ^ Compton, William C., and Edward Hoffman. Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Flourishing. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.
  24. ^ Wilkinson, Phaedra (October 21, 2014). "From the community: Exciting Class on Jewish Positive Psychology to be Presented in Northbrook". Chicago: Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 16 November 2014. The Jewish Learning Institute's (JLI) Newest Class Looks at Positive Psychology through the 3,000-year-old lens of Jewish thought. Northbrook, IL – When Israeli-born psychologist Tal Ben-Shahar began teaching a class called Positive Psychology at Harvard in 2006, a record 855 undergraduate students signed up for his class. Droves of students at the academically-intense university came to learn, as the course description puts it, about "psychological aspects of a fulfilling and flourishing life." 
  25. ^ "Chabad Jewish Center to present ‘How Happiness Thinks: Jewish Perspectives on Positive Psychology’". Cape Coral Daily Breeze. October 31, 2014. Retrieved 3 November 2014. Rabbi Zalman Abraham of JLI's headquarters in New York says that being happy can depend on one's perspective, explaining, "How Happiness Thinks is based on the premise that to be happy, you can either change the world, or you can change your thinking". While drawing on 3,000 years of Jewish wisdom on happiness, the course, which was prepared in partnership between JLI and the Washington School of Psychiatry, builds on the latest observations and discoveries in the field of positive psychology. 
  26. ^ "Positive psychology began as a new area of psychology in 1998 - PSYC - 101". www.coursehero.com. Retrieved 2017-02-08. 
  27. ^ Robertson, D (2010). The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy: Stoicism as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. London: Karnac. ISBN 978-1-85575-756-1. 
  28. ^ Tov & Diener (2013), Subjective Well-Being. Research Collection School of Social Sciences. Paper 1395. http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soss_research/1395
  29. ^ Iolanda Costa Galinha & José Luís Pais-Ribeiro (2011), Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(1), 34–53. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2i1.3
  30. ^ Diener, Suh, Ed, Eunkook (2000). Culture and Subjective Well-being. A Bradford Book. p. 4. 
  31. ^ Carol Ryff’s Model of Psychological Well-being. The Six Criteria of Well-Being
  32. ^ a b Robitschek, Christine; Keyes, Corey L. M. "Keyes's model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor.". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 56 (2): 321–329. doi:10.1037/a0013954. 
  33. ^ Keyes, Corey L. M. (2002-01-01). "The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 43 (2): 207–222. JSTOR 3090197. doi:10.2307/3090197. 
  34. ^ a b Joshanloo, Mohsen (2015-10-23). "Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling". Journal of Happiness Studies: 1–14. ISSN 1389-4978. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z. 
  35. ^ Joshanloo, Mohsen; Lamers, Sanne M. A. (2016-07-01). "Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling". Personality and Individual Differences. 97: 8–12. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.089. 
  36. ^ Gallagher, Matthew W.; Lopez, Shane J.; Preacher, Kristopher J. (2009-08-01). "The Hierarchical Structure of Well-Being". Journal of Personality. 77 (4): 1025–1050. ISSN 1467-6494. PMC 3865980 . PMID 19558444. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x. 
  37. ^ a b Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-016253-8. 
  38. ^ ""In the zone": enjoyment, creativity, and the nine elements of "flow"". MeaningandHappiness.com. Retrieved 2010-11-11. 
  39. ^ Lopez, S. J., Snyder, C. R. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 200.
  40. ^ Seligman 2002, p. 275.
  41. ^ a b c David Sze (2015), The Father of Positive Psychology and His Two Theories of Happiness
  42. ^ Wallis, Claudia (2005-01-09). "Science of Happiness: New Research on Mood, Satisfaction". TIME. Retrieved 2011-02-07. 
  43. ^ Best Benefit of Exercise? Happiness, Robin Loyd, Fox News, May 30, 2006.
  44. ^ "The World Question Center 2011— Page 2". Edge.org. Retrieved 2011-02-07. 
  45. ^ a b c Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press. Ch 1
  46. ^ "The Pursuit of Happiness". 
  47. ^ "Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi TED talk". 
  48. ^ "Other People Matter". 
  49. ^ "Using Positive Psychology in Your Relationships". 
  50. ^ "Start with Why". 
  51. ^ "Why do You do What You Do?". 
  52. ^ "The Science of a Happy Startup". 
  53. ^ a b Peterson, Christopher; Seligman, Martin E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-516701-5. 
  54. ^ Shryack, J.; Steger, M. F.; Krueger, R. F.; Kallie, C. S. (2010). "The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (6): 714–719. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.007. 
  55. ^ Brdr, I.; Kashdan, T.B. (2010). "Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates". Journal of Research in Personality. 44: 151–154. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001. 
  56. ^ Thagard, P. (2005). How to be a successful scientist. In M. E. Gorman, R. D. Tweney, D. C. Gooding & A. P. Kincannon (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 159- 171). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  57. ^ Schuurmans-Stekhoven, James (2011). "Is it God or just the data that moves in mysterious ways? How wellbeing researchers may be mistaking faith for virtue". Social Indicators Research. 100 (2): 313–330. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9630-7. 
  58. ^ Schneider, K. (2011). "Toward a Humanistic Positive Psychology". Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis. 22 (1): 32–38. 
  59. ^ Fredrickson, B. L.; Losada, M. F. (2005). "Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing". American Psychologist. 60 (7): 678–686. PMC 3126111 . PMID 16221001. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678. 
  60. ^ Schneider 2011, p. 35
  61. ^ Seligman, Martin E. (1995). The Optimistic Child. Houghton Mifflin Company. pp. 295–299. 
  62. ^ Seligman 1995, pp. 41–42
  63. ^ Sample, I. (19 November 2003). "How to be happy". The Guardian. 
  64. ^ Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology?. Review of general psychology, 9(2), 103.
  65. ^ Held, Barbara S. (January 2004). "The Negative Side of Positive Psychology". Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 44 (1): 9–41. doi:10.1177/0022167803259645. 

SourcesEdit

  • Argyle, Michael (2001). The Psychology of Happiness. Routledge. 
  • Benard, Bonnie (2004). Resiliency: What We Have Learned. San Francisco: WestEd. 
  • Biswas-Diener, Robert, & Diener, Ed. (2004). "The psychology of subjective well-being". Daedalus. 133 (2): 18–25. doi:10.1162/001152604323049352. 
  • Fromm, Eric (1973). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York: New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 0-03-007596-3. 
  • Held, BS (January 2004). "The Negative Side of Positive Psychology". Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 44 (1): 9–41. doi:10.1177/0022167803259645. 
  • Kahneman, Daniel; Diener, Ed; Schwarz, Norbert (2003). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation Publications. 
  • Kashdan, T.B. (2009). Curious? Discover the Missing Ingredient to a Fulfilling Life. New York, NY: HarperCollins. 
  • Keyes & J. Haidt (eds.). Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-lived. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. pp. 275–289. 
  • McMahon, Darrin M. (2006). Happiness: A History. Atlantic Monthly Press. 
  • Peterson, Christopher (2009). "Positive Psychology". Reclaiming Children and Youth. 18 (2): 3–7. 
  • Robbins B.D (2008). "What is the good life? Positive psychology and the renaissance of humanistic psychology" (PDF). The Humanistic Psychologist. 36 (2): 96–112. doi:10.1080/08873260802110988. 
  • Seligman, Martin (1990). Learned Optimism: How to Change Your Mind and Your Life. Free Press. 
  • Seligman, M.E.P.; Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000), "Positive Psychology: An introduction", American Psychologist, 55 (1): 5–14, PMID 11392865, doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 
  • Seligman, M.E.P. (Spring 2004). "Can Happiness be Taught?". Daedalus. 133 (2): 80–87. doi:10.1162/001152604323049424. 
  • Seligman, M.E.P. (2011), Flourish. A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being, Simon & Schuster 
  • Snyder, C.R., and Lopez, Shane J. (2001). Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press. 
  • Stebbins, R.A. (2015). Leisure and Positive Psychology: Linking Activities with Positiveness. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 
  • Zagano, Phyllis; Gillespie, C. Kevin (2006). "Ignatian Spirituality and Positive Psychology". The Way. 45 (4): 41–58.  (Tr. to Italian: "La Spiritualita Ignaziana e la psicologia positiva" La relazione d'aiuto: il counseling tra psicologia e fede, Ed. Andrea Toniolo, Padua, (November 2008) 29–44)

Further readingEdit

  • Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi (2000), Positive Psychology. An Introduction.
  • Seligman, M.E.P. (2011), Flourish. A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being, Simon & Schuster 
  • Howard Cutler and the Dalai Lama, The Art of Happiness

External linksEdit