Open main menu

Wikipedia β

A Jagir (IAST: Jāgīr), also spelled as Jageer,[1] was a type of feudal land grant in South Asia at the foundation of its Jagirdar system.[2][3] It developed during the Islamic rule era of the Indian subcontinent, starting in the early 13th century, wherein the powers to govern and collect tax from an estate was granted to an appointee of the state.[2] The tenants were considered to be in the servitude of the jagirdar.[4] There were two forms of jagir, one being conditional and the other unconditional. The conditional jagir required the governing family to maintain troops and provide their service to the state when asked.[2][3] The land grant was called iqta, usually for a holder's lifetime, and the land reverted to the state upon the death of the jagirdar.[2][5]

The jagirdar system was introduced by the Delhi Sultanate,[2] and continued during the Mughal Empire,[6] but with a difference. In the Mughal times, the jagirdar collected taxes which paid his salary and the rest to the Mughal treasury, while the administration and military authority was given to a separate Mughal appointee.[7] After the collapse of Mughal Empire, the system of jagirs was retained by Rajput and Sikh kingdoms, and later in a form by the British East India Company.[2][8][9]

Contents

Definition of JagirEdit

Jagir (Persian: جاگیر, Devanagari: जागीर, Bengali: জায়গীর) is a Persian word, and means "holding land".[2]

The Supreme Court of India used the following definition of the Jagir from Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act (Rajasthan Act VI of 1952) in its Thakur Amar Singhji vs State Of Rajasthan(And Other ...) on 15 April 1955 judgement:
The word 'jagir' connoted originally grants made by Rajput Rulers to their clansmen for military services rendered or to be rendered. Later on grants made for religious and charitable purposes and even to non-Rajputs were called jagirs, and both in its popular sense and legislative practice, the word jagir came to be used as connoting all grants which conferred on the grantees rights in respect of land revenue, and that is the sense in which the word jagir should be construed in Article 31-A.

SuccessionEdit

A jagir was technically a feudal life estate, as the grant reverted to the state upon the jagirdar's death. However, in practice, jagirs became hereditary to the male lineal heir of the jagirdar.[10][11] The family was thus the de facto ruler of the territory, earned income from part of the tax revenues and delivered the rest to the treasury of the state during the Islamic rule period, and later in parts of India that came under Afghan, Sikh and Dogra rulers. The jagirdar did not act alone, but appointed administrative layers for revenue collection. These positions, according to Shakti Kak, were called patwari, tahsildar, amil, fotedar, munsif, qanungo, chaudhri, dewan and others.[12]

13th century origin of Jagirs and successorsEdit

This feudal system of land ownership is referred to as the jagirdar system. The system was introduced by the Sultans of Delhi from 13th century onwards, was later adopted by the Mughal Empire, and continued under the British East India Company.[2]

Some Hindu jagirdars were converted into Muslim vassal states under Mughal imperial sway, such as the nawwabs of Kurnool. Most princely states of India during the colonial British Raj era were jagirdars such as Mohrampur Jagir. Shortly following independence from the British Crown in 1947, the jagirdar system was abolished by the Indian government in 1951.[13][14]

Types of JagirsEdit

The Jagir grants were of several kinds and were known under different expressions, including Jagir, an area of neighboring towns or villages with an administrative Paigah, Agrahar, Umli, Mukasa, Inam, and Maktha.[15]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ HH Davies; W Blyth (1873). Umritsur, Sowrian & Turun Tarun. Lahore: Government Civil Secretariat Press. p. 29. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Jāgīrdār system: INDIAN TAX SYSTEM, Encyclopædia Britannica (2009)
  3. ^ a b Kaushik Roy (2015). Military Manpower, Armies and Warfare in South Asia. Taylor & Francis. pp. 57–59. ISBN 978-1-317-32127-9. 
  4. ^ Mohammad Qadeer (2006). Pakistan - Social and Cultural Transformations in a Muslim Nation. Routledge. pp. ix, 44. ISBN 978-1-134-18617-4. 
  5. ^ Claude Markovits (2004). A History of Modern India, 1480-1950. Anthem Press. p. 567. ISBN 978-1-84331-152-2. 
  6. ^ Jamal Malik (2008). Islam in South Asia: A Short History. BRILL Academic. p. 491. ISBN 90-04-16859-1. 
  7. ^ Catherine B. Asher; Cynthia Talbot (2006). India Before Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 125–127. ISBN 978-0-521-80904-7. 
  8. ^ Kaushik Roy (2015). Military Manpower, Armies and Warfare in South Asia. Routledge. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-1-317-32128-6. 
  9. ^ Madanjit Kaur (2008). Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Unistar. pp. 31–40. ISBN 978-81-89899-54-7. 
  10. ^ John F. Richards (1995). The Mughal Empire. Cambridge University Press. pp. 292–293. ISBN 978-0-521-56603-2. 
  11. ^ Sind. Commissioner's Office (1886). History of Alienations in the Province of Sind. Karachi: Commissioner's Press. p. 143. 
  12. ^ Shakti Kak (2007). Waltraud Ernst; Biswamoy Pati, eds. India's Princely States: People, Princes and Colonialism. Routledge. pp. 71–72. ISBN 978-1-134-11988-2. 
  13. ^ Staff (2000). Merriam-Webster's collegiate encyclopedia. Merriam-Webster. p. 834. ISBN 0-87779-017-5. 
  14. ^ Singh, Kumar Suresh; Lal, Rajendra Behari (2003). Gujarat, Part 3. People of India, Kumar Suresh Singh Gujarat, Anthropological Survey of India. 22. Popular Prakashan. p. 1350. ISBN 81-7991-106-3. 
  15. ^ Indian Kanoon document 10572