Help talk:Introduction/Conclusion
(Redirected from Help talk:Introduction to Wikipedia conclusion)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Wbm1058 in topic Requested move 1 July 2020
 | This is not the page to ask for help or make test edits.
To make test edits, please use the Sandbox. For other help, please see our main help page. |
 | Feedback from new editors on the tutorial series is collected here. To leave feedback, please . |
 | Other talk page banners | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Requested move 1 July 2020
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Help:Introduction to Wikipedia conclusion → Help:Introduction/Conclusion – better format. Interstellarity (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. © Tbhotch™ (en-3). 04:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Conditional oppose. I agree with the nominator that the hierarchy structure of the Help:Intro series is not as good as it could be. Ideally, everything would be cleanly nested under Help:Introduction (this would've made it easier to implement the editnotice, for instance). However, that would come with some tradeoffs to readability—the current Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/3 reads better than a nested Help:Introduction/Images/Wiki Markup/3 would. Given that, I think WP:BROKE becomes the tiebreaker — it's not something worth the effort/disruption to change. If someone felt very strongly and came up with a full scheme for what to rename every page in the series, I'd give it a good look and might end up supporting, but renaming just this one page doesn't make sense, especially given that it isn't a subpage of Help:Introduction to Wikipedia in the first place. The proper rename would be Help:Introduction/Conclusion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- As one aside, in case it comes up, per WP:NCCAPS, page titles are sentence case. We see that elsewhere in the Help:Intro series with page titles like Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/1. So the lowercase "c" is correct for the current formulation, although we'd want to capitalize it as proposed if we did switch to using subpages. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: I will change my proposal to the title you suggested. Interstellarity (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- As one aside, in case it comes up, per WP:NCCAPS, page titles are sentence case. We see that elsewhere in the Help:Intro series with page titles like Help:Introduction to images with Wiki Markup/1. So the lowercase "c" is correct for the current formulation, although we'd want to capitalize it as proposed if we did switch to using subpages. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support something. Right now, the title implies that the page is an introduction to something called a "Wikipedia conclusion". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.