This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hello @BD2412: There were a couple discussions about this here and here. Several editors, including myself, were opposed to a Blue article, so she is now covered at Velociraptors in Jurassic Park. As for the draft:
The Velociraptors page does a better job of summarizing the in-universe details.
The production section is brief and already covered at the Velociraptors article.
The reception section also duplicates the Velociraptors page.
Since edits from this draft were copied into the raptors page, should we just redirect the draft there? AJFU (talk) 14:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
To clarify, is everything currently in the draft also already reflected in the mainspace article. So long as no information is lost, that is a reasonable solution. BD2412T 15:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
What is covered in the draft's Production and Reception sections is also present in the mainspace article, with minor differences in wording. The only major difference is the in-universe stuff, but I don't know if that would be enough to prevent a redirect (comparison here and here). AJFU (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
At the end of the day, the question is whether it serves the reader to have a separate article. Blue (Jurassic World) gets 3-4 views per day, so some number of people (albeit not by any means a large number) are specifically looking for the character. Is the content on the general page sufficient to satisfy the reasonable interests of readers who are interested in reading about the character? BD2412T 19:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do think the main article is sufficient. Of course, anyone is free to start a split discussion there if they think a separate article is warranted. AJFU (talk) 20:58, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Redirecting, but keeping the draft text below the redirect in case someone wants to revisit this in the future. BD2412T 21:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
