Submission declined on 2 October 2023 by GMH Melbourne (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 25 September 2023 by Tagishsimon (talk). Can you improve the referencing of this article - more refs, especially from independent sources. It's a bit thin right now. Declined by Tagishsimon 8 months ago. | |
Comment: Sources don't prove notability. See WP:GNG for the source criteria. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 07:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Young Labor Left NSW also known as YLL is the unofficial youth wing of the NSW Left, the NSW branch of the national ALP Left faction.[1] It competes with the more economically liberal Labor Right faction in NSW Young Labor.[2]
Young Labor Left NSW | |
|---|---|
| Abbreviation | YLL |
| Secretary |
|
| Assistant Secretary |
|
| Student wing | National Labor Students |
| Ideology | |
| National affiliation | Australian Young Labor |
| Colours | Red |
| Federal Parliamentary Caucus | 0 / 103
|
| Part of a series on |
| Labour politics in Australia |
|---|
YLL promotes democratic socialism, trade unionism, workers' control of industry, participatory and representative democracy, the abolition of private property, environmentalism, feminism, LGBTQIA+ rights and Indigenous rights.[3] YLL is anti-capitalist, anti-colonial and anti-fascist.
History
editYoung Labor Left has been around as a loose factional grouping since the 1980s.[4]
By 1984, the now-influential group was split between the Soft and Hard Left — with the Hard Left having the backing of trade unions and future politicians such as Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek, while the Soft Left had the backing of a loose grouping of rank-and-file activists and politicians such as Peter Baldwin and John Faulkner. Future members of parliament from the Soft Left would include Laurie Ferguson, Paul Lynch, Anthony D'Adam, Cameron Murphy and Lynda Voltz.
As writes Andrew Leigh of the disputes during the mid-1980s:
"By 1984, bitter conflicts had erupted between the two groups in Young Labor Left. At this stage, control of the caucus see-sawed between the two groups. [...] Albanese was a key player by this stage, and was to become President (by a narrow margin) at that year’s annual conference. But in January 1986, a Young Labor Left caucus meeting was held to decide who would be the three delegates to the Central Steering Committee caucus. When the issue was forced to a ballot, the Soft Left took all three positions. The loss hardened Albanese’s resolve to defeat the Soft Left."
In 2013, a historic split occurred in the University of Sydney Labor Left caucus, which was at the time a branch of National Labor Students (NLS) — the peak student political faction of Labor Left. The breakaway faction, self-named Sydney Labor Students (SLS), named a list of grievances involving resentment involving resentment towards identity politics and perceived radical feminism — as well as perceived lack of activism.[5]
References
edit- ^ "Young Labor Left".
- ^ "What can Labor do for young people?".
- ^ "Young Labor Left". Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- ^ Leigh, Andrew (2000). "Factions and Fractions: A Case Study of Power Politics in the Australian Labor Party". Australian Journal of Political Science. 35 (3): 434. doi:10.1080/713649348. S2CID 144601220.
- ^ "A political paradigm shifts as NLS splits". Archived from the original on 2019-08-02.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.