Category talk:Subfields of zoology

I think this is where I put this, I just wondering if this is the best place for a link to cryptozoology, as a pseudoscience it does not abide by the scientific method and therefor is not officially recognized as a scientific branch. Would it not be more appropriete to have this article link from a pseudoscience page. --Stephen Deloney 01:13, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Cryptozoology runs the gamut from respectable science to complete crackpottery, and I don't consider a blanket condemnation as pseudoscience to be justified. However it seems to me that cryptozoology (and all the other subcategories) here would be better tied directly to Category:Zoology.Lavateraguy 01:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

On second thoughts maybe we'd be better off without this category at all (move members to zoology) and instead have a List of subfields of Zoology, or better List of subfields of Biology, as the Zoology/Botany dichotomy is going the way of the animal/plant dichotomy. Lavateraguy 10:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)