This category is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Richhoncho, C2D "generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator". The closing admin can decide if C2D applies in this case. It is helpful to mention that the article was renamed by RM as that confirms the move was not controversial. TSventon (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Fayenatic london: This discussion never took place as the original nominator of the speedy request took it upon himself to manually move all the content to the proposed names. Should these be reverted? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me01:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Looks good for now. There is no other meaning of KSI that has a category, so a full discussion might well approve renaming to the short name; but it is required. – FayenaticLondon07:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply