1952 Kern County earthquake
The 1952 Kern County earthquake occurred on July 21 in the southern San Joaquin Valley and measured 7.3 on the moment magnitude scale. The main shock occurred at 4:52 am Pacific Daylight Time (11:52 UTC), killed 12 people and injured hundreds, and caused an estimated $60 million in property damage. A small sector of damage near Bealville corresponded to a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme), though this intensity rating was not representative of the majority of damage. The earthquake occurred on the White Wolf Fault near the community of Wheeler Ridge and was the strongest to occur in California since the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.
|UTC time||1952-07-21 11:52:16|
|Local date||July 21, 1952|
|Local time||4:52 am PDT|
|Magnitude||Mw 7.3  Ms 7.5 |
|Depth||16 km (9.9 mi) |
|Fault||White Wolf Fault|
|Areas affected||Southern California |
|Total damage||$70 million |
|Max. intensity||XI (Extreme) |
|Peak acceleration||~ 1g (est) |
|Casualties||14 killed  |
Hundreds injured 
The town of Tehachapi suffered the greatest damage and loss of life from the earthquake, though other locations in Kern County experienced significant damage as well, but its effects were widely felt throughout central and southern California. The July mainshock had a significant aftershock sequence that persisted into July and August with many magnitude 5+ events with intensities of V (Moderate) to VII (Very strong). Six of these aftershocks occurred on the day of the mainshock, but the strongest aftershock came on August 22 as a M5.8 event that had a maximum perceived intensity of VIII (Severe) and resulted in the deaths of two people and caused an additional $10 million in property damage.
Following the event, a field survey was conducted along the fault zone with the goal of estimating the peak ground acceleration of the shock based on visually evaluating precarious rock formations and other indicators. Ground disturbances that were created by the earthquakes were also surveyed, both in the valley and in the foothills, with both vertical and horizontal displacements present in the epicentral area. The strong motion records that were acquired from the event were significant, and a reconnaissance report was recognized for its coverage of the event, and how it set a standard for those types of engineering or scientific papers. Repercussions of the sequence of earthquakes were still being felt in the heavily damaged downtown area of Bakersfield well into the 1990s as city leaders attempted to improve safety of the surviving unreinforced masonry buildings.
At Lebec, California, just south of the epicenter of the July mainshock, the San Andreas Fault comes together with the Garlock Fault, which is positioned at the northern border of the Mojave Desert. The San Andreas has been responsible for considerable seismic activity at its northern and southern sections, and traverses the area near the Transverse Ranges. The Kern Canyon Fault mirrors the path of the Kern River, and was thought to have a connection with the White Wolf Fault, but indicators observed following the July 21 earthquake demonstrated that the two are offset. The Owens Valley Fault, on the east side of the Sierran block, has been mapped and may possibly extend into area that was affected by the 1952 shocks. Other fault zones are present in the region, and have been of interest because they may have been responsible for minor earthquakes, but they are considered not as significant as the Kern Canyon, Owens Valley, and San Andreas Faults.
The 1952 earthquakes were the first to be observed well within Kern County lines. Other strong, but remote events were previously felt in the area, but they were distant enough to cause only occasional destructive effects. The county is bounded on the western side by the Temblor Range which is adjacent to the southern San Andreas Fault. Other large events have affected the area as well, like the January 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake that severely affected Fort Tejon (about 15 miles (24 km) south of Wheeler Ridge).
The M7.3 earthquake occurred on the strike-slip White Wolf Fault in the southern San Joaqin Valley. Historically, the left-lateral fault has had a component of reverse slip, and at the time of the July mainshock the ratio of reverse/left-lateral slip was about 1.2:1. The epicenter of the shock was at the 90 km (56 mi) fault's southwestern end, at a point where it may end, or merge with the east–west trending Pleito thrust fault. The White Wolf Fault (as illuminated by the aftershocks) was found to be curved, with less dip on the northeast end, though that zone also had a higher strike-slip component. Other distinct characteristics on that end of the fault were the shallower shocks and the less overall slip. If the total fault displacement came about as a result of the same type of large-displacement shocks like the one in 1952, the recurrence interval was proposed to be 170–450 years. The 1995 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities gave a (high uncertainty) slip rate estimate of 2 mm per year.
Seismologists have recently proposed the hypothesis that the earthquake is an exceptional instance of induced seismicity triggered by petroleum extraction from the Wheeler Ridge oil field. Oil production from that field began 98 days before the earthquake, about 1 km (0.62 mi) from the White Wolf Fault. According to this hypothesis, petroleum extraction did not contribute to the energy of the earthquake, but rather altered conditions in the fault enabling the catastrophic release of accumulated stress; a comparable (or perhaps more destructive) spontaneous earthquake would have occurred along the fault at some later time.
Mercalli intensities for the mainshock were gauged to be VIII (Severe), especially in Tehachapi and close to the epicenter, but southeast of Bealville 46 cm (18 in) thick reinforced concrete railroad tunnel walls were cracked, tracks were warped, and the gap between tunnel entrances was reduced by up to 2.5 meters (8 ft 2 in). Because of the extraordinary damage there, an intensity rating of XI (Extreme) was assigned specifically for that location.
Though damage was spread throughout a large area, most was concentrated in the town of Tehachapi where at least 11 were killed and 35 were injured. An early estimate reported in the Los Angeles Times had the damage at $2.6 million with 700 families affected in Tehachapi alone, where most of the town's buildings sustained damage. Fifteen homes were destroyed there, 53 were heavily damaged, and another 75 sustained light damage. In Bakersfield, windows were broken and dislodged plaster littered residential and commercial districts, and the county jail was damaged. Two tunnels used by the Southern Pacific Railroad and the Santa Fe Railroad collapsed between Tehachapi and Marcel, six more tunnels received lesser damage, and 3.5 miles (5.6 km) of track was distorted through two horseshoe curves.
To the southwest of Bakersfield in Maricopa, the justice court building, the Maricopa Hotel, the post office, and several businesses were condemned because of heavy damage. In the small town of Taft disruption was light, with the exception of a destroyed wall at a J. C. Penney department store and a single home that was damaged. In the (former) settlement of Paloma a fire burned at an oil refinery, and an explosion occurred at a refinery in Long Beach due to a cracked pipe, but most of the Greater Los Angeles Area was free from heavy damage due to the distant location (around 10 miles southwest of Tehachapi) of the earthquake. Power disruptions affected Van Nuys and Los Angeles and in Long Beach some windows were broken. Other moderate damage in that area included a 2.5 ft (0.76 m) crack on a street in Hollywood and a 90 ft (27 m) crack in a Santa Ana parking lot.
|Aftershocks (MMI ≥ VI (Strong))|
|5.1 ML||July 21 at 15:13||VI|
|5.7 Mw||July 23 at 00:38||VI|
|5.2 Mw||July 23 at 07:53||VII|
|5.8 Mw||July 23 at 13:17||VII|
|5.2 ML||July 23 at 18:13||VI|
|5.8 Mw||July 25 at 19:09||VI|
|5.9 Mw||July 25 at 19:43||VI|
|6.3 Mw||July 29 at 07:03||VII|
|5.5 Mw||July 31 at 12:09||VI|
|5.8 Mw||Aug 22 at 22:41||VIII|
|Stover & Coffman 1993, pp. 86, 87, 144–147|
Through late September, Caltech seismometers recorded 188 aftershocks higher than magnitude 4.0. Six of those on the day of the mainshock were M5 and above, but some of these (like the 12:05 M6.3 shock) were only felt, and didn't cause any damage. The July 21 M5.1 shock at 15:13 GMT and the July 23 shock at 00:38 both damaged buildings in Arvin, and the latter event also caused slight damage in Fresno and near Bakersfield. Three additional shocks on July 23 were particularly destructive. Walls and other portions of buildings that had been previously damaged took a second hit from the 07:53 M5.2 event, and a house that saw only minor damage during the mainshock was nearly destroyed by it. Gas and water lines were also severed, and transformers were loosened or dislodged. The 13:17 M5.8 shock compounded problems at Tehachapi and Arvin with damage to previously-affected buildings that was described as serious, but the 18:13 shock on July 23 only had a slight affect at Arvin.
Two shocks on July 25 that occurred within an hour of each other were felt throughout central California and caused pipeline damage south of Bakersfield and other minor building damage in several locations. Pre-existing ground disturbances were enhanced in Tejon Canyon, and landslides occurred at Caliente Creek Canyon, Oiler Canyon Grade, and on State Route 178 between Kernville and Bakersfield. A number of fires were initiated by the July 29 aftershock (intensity VII (Very strong)) and other severe damage was caused by it, especially to buildings that had already been damaged (including one in Bakersfield). The strongest aftershock in the sequence came on August 22 as a magnitude 5.8 event with a maximum perceived intensity of VIII (Severe). Damage was especially heavy to brick buildings in Bakersfield, and although only a few buildings collapsed outright, 90 of 264 buildings that the shock damaged needed to be brought down completely. Total damage from this event alone was estimated to be $10 million, with several injuries, and two additional deaths.
Prior to the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Nantou County, Taiwan, little information was available for estimating ground motion that resulted from large (greater than M7) thrust earthquakes, and whether the values seen in that event are commonplace remains unresolved. Foam rubber modeling, numerical modeling, and field studies have shown that intense ground motions close to 1g are possible on the hanging wall side of the fault during some large thrust earthquakes. A common occurrence of shattered rock that has been observed on the hanging wall of thrust faults reinforces the existence of the strong motions, but precarious rock surveys have indicated that smaller ground motions are present on the foot wall side of the fault. Foam rubber modelling studies confirm that the ground motion on the foot wall side can be lower by a factor of up to five, and an example of this imbalance was displayed during the September 1999 M7.6 earthquake in Taiwan.
Rocks are classified as precarious if their toppling accelerations are .3g or less and semi-precarious at .3–.5g. The area around the White Wolf fault was surveyed by a group of earth scientists with extensive experience estimating thousands of rock formations. The toppling accelerations of many rocks were assessed by the three geologists, with individual estimates usually agreeing within .1g. On the foot wall side, many precarious and semi-precarious rock formations were observed and allowed for peak ground acceleration to be estimated at .5g (within a kilometer of the fault trace) while rock shattering and a lack of precarious rocks on the hanging wall side suggested a value near 1g had been experienced at the time of the shock.
Many erratic surface fractures were generated in the San Joaquin Valley along the White Wolf Fault. The cracks were not well-defined, and were the result of the disturbance of the alluvium that makes up the valley floor, rather than cracking along the fault trace. Northeast trending cracks ranging from hairline-width to near five inches wide were seen between Arvin and California State Route 166, and some showed clear lateral offset, but those were determined to be localized effects. Some of the fractures in the ground were aligned with the fault, and some were perpendicular to the general trend, but the more significant breaks were believed to be a direct result of faulting at depth. This was true in the mountainous areas as well, but some of the breaks at the higher elevations were probably related to slumping. The northeast trending breaks were described in a report from the State of California (that was prepared by well-known geologists and seismologists) as "thrusting of the southeast block up and over the northwest block, and/or a lateral movement of the southeast block to the northeast".
Offset rows of cotton were documented at a number of locations along the northeast trending fault breaks in the valley. An offset of 3 ft (0.91 m) was seen 17 miles (27 km) south of Bakersfield, about .5 mi (0.80 km) east of California State Route 99, and 3 miles (4.8 km) southwest of Arvin a north–south oriented row was offset with movement towards the west on the south side of the shift. At the same location, an east–west road was dislocated towards the northeast a minimum of 5 ft (1.5 m), and near the mouth of Comanche Creek (6 miles (9.7 km) south of Arvin) a shallow-sloped fault scarp was raised with a maximum vertical displacement of about 3 ft (0.91 m).
Beno Gutenberg, a German-American seismologist, was the director of the Caltech Seismological Laboratory at the time of the shock. He commented about the event first by saying that the energy of the event was 100 times that of the 1933 Long Beach earthquake. In statements made in the July 22 Los Angeles Times, the shock was compared to the 1857 Fort Tejon event. He went on to say, "There is no doubt that yesterday's quake is the largest Southern California has had in this century and is the largest to occur in this area since modern instruments were available. It's possible that the 1857 quake might have been more intense." Charles Richter departed the lab in Pasadena in a mobile seismograph truck bound for the epicentral area to record aftershocks close to the fault, and Harry O. Wood (the founder of the lab thirty years prior) visited the lab following the onset of the shocks and commented that it was still not possible to predict the location of large earthquakes.
The American Red Cross called it a major disaster, but getting relief into the area was stalled because of landslides blocking the ridge route running between Los Angeles and Kern counties. California State Route 99 was also blocked by a landslide ten miles south of Gorman, but the highway was quickly reopened later in the day. All aircraft not related to the relief effort were ordered not to land at the Tehachapi Municipal Airport. All 417 inmates from the Tehachapi Prison for Women were evacuated because of damage; the California Department of Corrections stated that the facility was left unusable. Most of the injured received medical care at Kern County General Hospital and some sought treatment at Tehachapi Valley Hospital, where some existing patients were moved to make room for new arrivals.
The railroad was reopened in 25 days by a construction force of one-thousand men and 175 pieces of earth-moving equipment including seven track gangs, nine bridge and building gangs, and personnel and equipment from Morrison-Knudsen. Four tunnels were quickly repaired, two more were daylighted by removing overburden to convert them to cuts, one was partially daylighted, and 1,250,000 cubic yards (960,000 m3) of fill were placed to construct a 4,358-foot (1.328 km) temporary alignment around the eighth tunnel while permanent repairs were underway.
Downtown Bakersfield was heavily impacted by the earthquakes, and many damaged buildings were bulldozed to make room for buildings that were eventually constructed with newer architectural styles. After World War II, and with a booming economy, the region was experiencing a period of urban renewal. The Kern County Courthouse, St. Francis Church, and the original Beale Memorial Clock Tower were all damaged and were leveled or rebuilt. In what may have been an overambitious push for renewal, some historic buildings that may have been able to be salvaged also were brought down, though some stood for many years after the earthquakes. Some of Bakersfield's unreinforced masonry buildings survived the shocks and were still in use years later, but the cost of retrofitting these buildings was often prohibitive for their owners, and the Bakersfield City Council was given the authority to seize or demolish them in 1993. The city changed its approach in the late 1990s after building owners complained that the upgrade process was too expensive, and the possibility that the city may be left in possession of properties that were left needing the costly renovations.
Following most present day damaging earthquakes, teams of investigators from institutions such as the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute are sent to the affected region to set up instruments to capture strong motion records, and to study the damage and other effects of the event. This has not always been the case, and the 1954 report from Steinbrugge and Moran that thoroughly detailed the effects (especially to buildings) of the 1952 shocks put in place a model for how modern earthquake reconnaissance reports are written. The strong motion record that was obtained from the 1952 shock, as well as the accelerogram from the 1940 El Centro earthquake, were the most widely used data sets until the 1971 San Fernando earthquake.
- Bawden, G. W. (2001), "Source parameters for the 1952 Kern County earthquake, California: A joint inversion of leveling and triangulation observations", Journal of Geophysical Research, 106 (B1): 771, Bibcode:2001JGR...106..771B, doi:10.1029/2000JB900315
- ISC-OB Event 893168 [IRIS].
- Stover & Coffman 1993, p. 86
- ISC-OB Event 893168 [IRIS].
- USGS (September 4, 2009), PAGER-CAT Earthquake Catalog, Version 2008_06.1, United States Geological Survey, archived from the original on January 15, 2018
- Stover & Coffman 1993, p. 144
- Brune et al. 2004, p. 2002
- State of California (1952), Report on physical effects of Arvin earthquake of July 21, 1952, California Department of Public Works – Division of Water Resources, pp. 5–7, archived from the original on April 13, 2014, retrieved April 12, 2014
- Steinbrugge, K. V.; Moran, D. F. (1954), "An Engineering Study of the Southern California Earthquake of July 21, 1952, and Its Aftershocks", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 44 (2B): 202, 203
- Yeats, R. (2012), Active Faults of the World, Cambridge University Press, pp. 118, 119, ISBN 978-0-521-19085-5
- Hough, Susan E.; Tsai, Victor C.; Walker, Robert; Aminzadeh, Fred (2017), "Was the Mw 7.5 1952 Kern County, California, earthquake induced (or triggered)?", Journal of Seismology, 21 (6): 1613–1621, doi:10.1007/s10950-017-9685-x, PMC 5693966, PMID 29200935
- Los Angeles Times (July 22, 1952). "New Quakes Felt In South Area Today – State Pledges Help in Tehachapi Crisis; 11 Killed, Scores Hurt". Los Angeles Times.
- "Earthquake Rocks San Joaquin Division". The Western Railroader. 15 (156): 1–8. 1952.
- Stover & Coffman 1993, pp. 86, 87, 144–147
- Brune et al. 2004, pp. 1993, 1994
- Brune et al. 2004, pp. 1994, 1996, 2001, 2002
- Barton, W. S. (July 22, 1952). "Aftershocks for 2 Years Predicted – Tehachapi Quake Energy Believed 100 Times That of 1933 Temblor". Los Angeles Times.
- Mayer, S. (July 21, 2012). "Earthquakes of 1952: Quakes and attitudes changed Bakersfield's historic downtown". The Bakersfield Californian.
- Reitherman, R. (2012). Earthquakes and Engineers: An International History. American Society of Civil Engineers. p. 666. ISBN 978-0-7844-1071-4.
- Brune, J. N.; Anooshehpoor, A.; Shi, B; Zeng, Y. (2004), "Precarious rock and overturned transformer evidence for ground shaking in the Ms 7.7 Kern County earthquake: An analog for disastrous shaking from a major thrust fault in the Los Angeles basin", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94 (6): 1993–2003, Bibcode:2004BuSSA..94.1993B, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.460.9188, doi:10.1785/0120030252
- International Seismological Centre, On-line Bulletin, Thatcham, United Kingdom, http://www.isc.ac.uk/.
- Stover, C. W.; Coffman, J. L. (1993), Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised), U.S. Geological Survey professional paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office
- Salditch, Leah; Hough, Susan E.; Stein, Seth; Spencer, Bruce D.; Brooks, Edward M.; Neely, James S.; Lucas, Madeleine C. (2018), "The 1952 Kern County, California earthquake: A case study of issues in the analysis of historical intensity data for estimation of source parameters", Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 283: 140–151, Bibcode:2018PEPI..283..140S, doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2018.08.007
- The International Seismological Centre has a bibliography and/or authoritative data for this event.
- M 7.5 - 6km WNW of Grapevine, CA – United States Geological Survey–ANSS
- Kern County Earthquake – Southern California Earthquake Center
- Now & Then: Remembering the quake of 1952 – Tehachapi News
- The White Wolf Fault and the Bakersfield Earthquake of 1952 – San Joaquin Valley Geology