Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 244

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 240 ← Archive 242 Archive 243 Archive 244 Archive 245 Archive 246 → Archive 250

Draft:Kai Sundmacher

I, Mpi-m, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mpi-m (talk) 08:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Benner

I, Mpi-m, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mpi-m (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Michael B. Bracken

I, LENK2121, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LENK2121 (talk) 20:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Home Credit Philippines

Making this request for undeletion as per the advice of @NgYShung , who had originally removed the article. I do feel that the sections of the article-- general overview, history of the company, information about the product and partners-- are all quite objective and do not contain soapbox content. The Home Credit Philippines article contains all original content, with media citations to verify the accuracy of the information provided. But I am more than happy to just have the page restored for further improvements to the writing, so that the article can be publish-worthy. Hoping for admin's consideration. thanks! -Jbmangahas (talk) 03:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Nyttend (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. That sort of information is indeed spam-like, so I am not going to undelete it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the feedback-- these are all noted. With this, may I request that the draft be moved to Articles for creation, for further improvements to make it publishable?

Jbmangahas (talk) 09:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Nyttend would still need to be the one who does it, especially given how promotional it was. I'll ping him so he can see this request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done This is one of the most blatantly promotional articles I've seen in quite a while; even if we accepted advertising, I'd be hesitant to keep it on copyright grounds, since the tone sounds like it was taken directly from a company brochure. Contrary to what was said at talk, all information stated here is factual in nature, and written in a non-hard sell way, the article had an entire "Easy, simple, fast application" section, and there were numerous other opinion-based statements: not at all factual, and very far from an encyclopedia article. Nyttend (talk) 12:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


Hi Nyttend, point well-taken. Really appreciate the feedback. I'd like to overhaul/change the article from the ground up and resubmit it for review. Would this be at all possible?

Jbmangahas (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Of course that's possible, and I'd encourage you to do it. Deletion as spam is an example of what the WP:TNT essay talks about: we delete a page as spam because it's basically unsalvageable without a complete rewrite, not because there's necessarily something wrong with having an article about its topic. Please be careful to write it all in your own words (to avoid copyright infringement), and please base everything you write on what's been published about Home Credit Philippines by independent reliable secondary sources, publications that aren't primary sources in a journalistic sense (stuff connected to HCP, whether its own publications or publications by related organizations) or in a historical sense (the latest news report about HCP's activities is an example of what not to use), and finally, please let me know if you want help. Nyttend (talk) 03:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking time to provide guidance, Nyttend! A huge help for a newcomer like me. Will do a full rewrite as advised. Thanks again!

Jbmangahas (talk) 04:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Gamelearn

retrieving expired PROD -Prisencolin (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jona Xiao

I, Drkurland, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drkurland (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I, Drkurland, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drkurland (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:User WPVG2/doc

Since Template:User WPVG2 was moved to User:Crash Underride/User WPVG2 with suppressed redirect, the doc page should have been moved to User:Crash Underride/User WPVG2/doc with suppressed redirect, not deleted. -GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Ingeborg Hoffmann

if this is about the German actress, I can salvage it. see de:Ingeborg Hoffmann (Schauspielerin) -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Actually it was about the politician. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Redeye 2006.jpg

uploaded by the subject, so can be considered donated material -Prisencolin (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Unless the subject holds the copyright to the work, it can't be considered donated material. (In general, copyright rests with the person who did the work/took the photo, not anyone depicted.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: That's correct. The file was deleted for the reason "no evidence of permission". Being the subject of the image doesn't constitute evidence of permission. The subject would have to get the copyright holder to send a letter based on WP:CONSENT to OTRS before we can undelete it. Note that this is unlikely, because the uploader himself tagged the image for deletion because of no permission. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Indeed. Okay I withdraw my claim to undeletion. I am curious to know what the image was though, if this could be emailed to me that would be great.--Prisencolin (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@Prisencolin: I erred in my last comment. The person who tagged it for deletion has a very similar username to the uploader (Redsky89 vs Redeye27) and in my quick glance though the history, my brain made them the same. So I retract that.
This was a small black-and-white image of a quarter-side-view of a dark-haired caucasian man's face, looks to be in his late 20s or early 30s. What article would this go in?
Some further information: there was a discussion Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 27#Image:Redeye_2006.jpg that resulted in a "keep", but the rationale wouldn't work today, because there was no actual license information given, just some rationalizing about the uploader. I wouldn't mind another admin giving a second opinion, though, since the image was later deleted in spite of this "keep" decision. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
It was on the article ReDeYe. Well I suppose if it were a black and white image, that would be sub-optimal considering there is already a full color image. I don't need the image anymore, thanks for your help.--Prisencolin (talk) 02:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

collete nwadike

This page is not a copyright and all information and content mentioned in it is well source and accurate from different external website, related link to Wikipedia and direct information from the person "AutoBiography" -Emmaolisa (talk) 11:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The previous page under that name contained only {{model-stub}}. The current page has no deletion request at all. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Sein Lyan Tun

wrongly deleted and then click the "Save page" button below -PS 17:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

  Done Be careful when editing in the future: when the only contributor blanks a page, that is often interpreted as a request to delete it. —C.Fred (talk) 17:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Groupes Bibliques Universitaires

I, NRCBeng, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NRCBeng (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Priscilla Corner

please keep my request for Priscillacorner Wikipedia undeletionSoumen491 (talk) 06:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)request for undeletion priscilla corner

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Corner, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Soumen491, this cannot be restored through here and once a request has been declined it's archived after a set amount of time. Re-requesting it here won't do anything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Abt Associates

I, Patriciaj102, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patriciaj102 (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. @Patriciaj102: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:17, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus:I did actually edit the page a number of times since it was first deleted. I had reached out to the most recent review for specific advice on what needs to be changed in order to render the article suitable for publication but the individual never responded. Any feedback would be appreciated! Patriciaj102 (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The last deletion was due to it being advertising. The G13 on the delete log entry is invalid in this case. You can ask User:Maile66 to reverse their deletion, as we give draft space more change to contain problematic content, that will be fixed up. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Decline to restore. The draft article history shows it was declined by different reviewers four times. 24 July 2015, 13 May 2016, 15 June 2016 and 6 July 2016. Those declines are on the editor's user talk page. It was nominated for Speedy Deletion this week, which is when I performed the deletion. Since the editor has the text of the article on their own talk page, I would suggest good-faith editing happen there and resubmit it later.— Maile (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Avishka Fernando

I created this page around 8 days ago. This page is on a Sri Lankan cricketer who was selected in their ODI series against Australia. Albeit, I do not meet the notability levels for cricketers criteria, but I had put a good quantity information of the cricketer. Each and every information that I had put on the page, was supported with respective sources. Request you to please reinstate the page. I am sure there must be a few cricketer biographies' created by authors that do not meet the notability levels for cricketers criteria. -Vikram Maingi (talk) 03:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: you are aware this article does not meet the notability requirements for cricketers (or indeed any notability requirements for that matter). Why would you restore a non-notable article that fails to meet any notability thresholds? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:CONTESTED, Prods are restored as a matter of course unless there is an immediately visible serious issue (e.g copy-vio or BLP vio). Assessing the notability of the topic is not a consideration at that point, generally - that is what AfD is for. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Well I guess you're happy with the BLP violations in the article too. Thanks for your time. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
@Lugnuts: What are BLP violations? Please share the same with me, so that it is taken care of in furure. Thanks.Vikram Maingi (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Not seeing any BLP violations, other than two unsources sentences that don't appear to be overly problematic. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Queen of Fools

This an historic album, becuase it contains the first appearance of the song Heartbreaker, voted the 72nd best hard rock song of all time by VH1. It has a wikipedoa article naming it pat benatars song. it was not the original. -Mooremusicbiz (talk) 14:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  • You'll also need some sort of sourcing to show that this is the same song and that it was originated by Jenny Darren. If this is the main thing that the album is known for, then it might not be independently notable outside of the article for "Heartbreaker". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Dennis Stamp

Deleted at AfD about 10 years ago. The deleting admin is no longer active. I would like this userfied so I can work on it. I've done a fair amount of research and can establish notability (at the very least, he was the American Wrestling Association rookie of the year in 1971). My sandbox or any other subpage is fine. -The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 17:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

file:Sri Lanka Girl Guides Association.png

driveby IP edit broke link causing removal -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Unzapped. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Namaste!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Miss Iraq

No reason why Miss Iraq, the national beauty contest of Iraq, does not merit its own page.

The contest was revived last year. Google search "Miss Iraq" for articles by NBC CNN and various other agencies.

Also, refer to the Ministry of Culture of Iraq website below:

http://crd.gov.iq/pgDetails.aspx?NID=1936 http://www.mocul.gov.iq/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5570 -Hbeaulandk (talk) 00:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Iraq, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kharkiv07 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Hbeaulandk, you were told by several people (one of whom was me) to take it to WP:DRV, as that's the only outlet for this. I've permanently protected the page from edits until it's approved via DRV for recreation. You must go through the proper channels for this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Australian Badminton Academy

It is a current company and although it wasnt updated regularly, i do not understand why it was deleted. Please undelete and allow me to revise and edit it as it is my company. -Anna Lao (talk) 08:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Brazilian Academy of Philosophy

I would like the article to be userfied and emailed to me -Jacaciodebarros (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

  Done The article is now at User:Jacaciodebarros/Brazilian Academy of Philosophy. --Randykitty (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Maptaphut Municipal Stadium

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Seetun (talk) 18:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCG Maptaphut Stadium, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Seetun, you must discuss this with MBisanz and if he declines, take it to WP:DRV. Recreating the article before that point in the mainspace is seen as disruptive, especially since this is the second time you've tried recreating it after it was deleted last month at AfD. Continuing to do this may lead to you getting blocked from editing, either temporarily or permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • It actually looks like you've done a lot of disruptive editing despite several warnings to stop. I'm giving you a short block accordingly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

GMA Worldwide Inc.

As I said before this page not to be deleted because it shows that this article is a company I even redirect to its parent company which is GMA Network Inc. So why we delete GMA Worldwide Inc. I need an explanation and I need to edit more about that article, so it can have more information about this company. -Kazaro (talk) 05:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Kazaro (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Kazaro

  • This was deleted by Kudpung as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, and WP:A1, a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify subject of article. I'm tagging him so he can respond to your request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
GMA Worldwide Inc. was a one-line promotional B@B directory entry with no attempt to source it or expand it for 12 days; we might make an exception and wait an hour or so to see if suc a stub will be expanded, but nearly two weeks s quite out of the question. Articles are either comply with WP:GNG and WP:ORG or are redirects, but not both. In fact, GMA Network Inc should be due for some greater scrutiny. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:National anthem of North Korea.ogg

The previous revision has been deleted, but the current revision is unsourced and thus does not comply with WP:NFCC. Thus, please restore the previous revision. -- Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Now sure how undeleting the previous files would fix that problem. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if I brought this up in the wrong place, but what I want is the previous revision of the file to be restored and the other ones hidden. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Which previous revision? There are 3 of them. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I would like it to be restored to the first revision. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Tera Intezaar

The article is about an upcoming film, whose principal photography has been started. Here's the reliable source. The article was deleted as it had been redirected to Arbaaz Khan (Pakistani actor), which I had redirected the article to wrong person, because the real one is Arbaaz Khan (Indian actor). -Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 17:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

It hasn't been released yet, the filming has just started, and there's one source (inaccessible to me) talking about it? Isn't this WP:TOOSOON to determine that this film has the notability to merit a Wikipedia article? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
There are many reliable sources. Just google "tera intezaar shooting begins" and you will get them. And as for notability, the film article IS notable, because principal photography of the film has started a month ago. So this isn't WP:TOOSOON. Just read WP:NF#Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 03:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Can you please help with the restoration of the redirect. The page is on upcoming film, whose principal photography was been started more than a month ago. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • It might actually be a better idea to start working on an article about the film itself and then make it live, if there's enough sourcing. I've experienced a lot of pushback when it comes to creating redirects that go to actors' pages, as it's typically argued that a film could have several notable actors and redirecting to one might not be all that helpful. Directors' pages are usually the best to redirect to but even then I've had some pushback on that as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Just check the article's revision history. I'm 100% sure that I had added content in it making it into article. Then I had redirected the article as the principal photography of the film had not started at that time. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 08:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I see it now - if Drmies has no problem with me restoring it, then I can restore this. It's kind of a tricky situation - it was technically deleted at AfD, although at that point in time it was a redirect. I just want to make sure that everything is kosher before doing any restoration. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Do what you think is right, Tokyogirl. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: I've updated and added more content relating to the shooting of the film. The article now passes WP:NFF. I now hope that you will take a kind and correct step after reading this. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 12:52, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Can you now please move the page to article namespace. Now the article meets the WP:NFF criteria. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • If you think it's ready, you can move it yourself, but I'd like to see a bit more coverage overall in order to be very certain. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: I want you to move it because if I will move User:Mr. Smart LION/Tera Intezaar, then this page will show redirect in my contributions. And as for the coverage of the article, I will update the article when more news of the article will come on Google. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 07:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm not really comfortable moving it since I don't know that it really passes NFF at this point in time. It's close, but the coverage is still a little on the light side. I'd prefer that it stay in you userspace until move coverage comes about. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

MH Group

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mehdisd1 (talk) 11:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

bookmyshow

Bookmyshow is a genuine and popular movie ticket portal similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fandango_Media but based out in India and lot of wikipedia article are linking to bookmyshow. I will improve the article to make it wiki compliance by removing all promotional element. Please recover the page and give me a chance to improve the quality of content and best contribution to wiki. -Kiranhota (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

comment This was deleted as part of a repeatedly-created promotional cluster, so the target pages are presently salted; any draft would definitely have to pass AFC well - David Gerard (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bookmyshow, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

SecurityMetrics

SecurityMetrics is a valuable company and contributes heavily to data security. If restored, we will fix the major problems with the article, and add more solid resources -Msbaxter22 (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecurityMetrics, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Luciano Layne

Please do not delete the Luciano Layne article page, I have worked very hard to put it together, he is a significant musician in his community and I have provided credible sources that point to his involvement in the music industry as he is a ghostwriter there is not a terrible amount of information on him but I would welcome recommendations to help better the article rather than just removing all the work that has been done by a contributor such as myself. -Sofxposh (talk) 02:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

  • This is currently up for deletion via PROD. This is the only type of deletion where you can remove the template to oppose the deletion, however you will need to show notability via RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Prod removed based on above request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Barcelona school killings

Not sure what happened here - this was speedied as "no content" overnight, but it was a three-paragraph translation of es:Asalto al IES Joan Fuster en Barcelona with a single news source, when I was tidying it up yesterday. -McGeddon (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

There was a vandalism edit, which may have been what the RCP and admin saw. Ping DGG, as this looks like a mistake. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, this should not have been nominated for speedy deleted, but reverted instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
At the time I saw it, the contents was a single line "9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB". I made the error of not noticing there was a good version in the article history, and I've restored it. DGG ( talk ) 17:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Yab Moung Records

I, Therattled, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Had no access to internet on an ongoing basis for last 6 months, I am keen to work on the page until it successfully meets the wiki criteria. Thanks and sorry for the hassle -Therattled (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

User talk:RockMgmt

User talk page deleted by request under G7, despite containing warnings and COI discussions with other users which may be relevant in the future if this soft-blocked corporate editor returns under a new name. The deletion contradicts WP:DELTALK (if there was some amazing libel added since I last saw the talk page, it alone could be redacted), and even WP:VANISH says that "User talk pages are usually not deleted." The user is of course welcome to simply blank their talk page and leave the history intact. -McGeddon (talk) 09:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I see no particular reason in the history why DELTALK should be disregarded here, and I think the correct action would be to restore and blank it; pinging DGG, the deleting admin, for his view. JohnCD (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
my error, restored the page. DGG ( talk ) 12:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Zambrero

This is a huge national food chain and should not have been deleted without a discussion; it apparently slipped through teh cracks at PROD. -The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@The Drover's Wife:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user LibStar (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. What the article needs is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Ta. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Guarantee Security Life Insurance Company

There seem to be at least a couple reliable sources regarding Guarantee Security Life Insurance Company, including this book and this article. Also this article. Concerned user (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC) -Concerned user (talk) 20:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@Concerned user:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Meatsgains (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Mero Nepal

I have copied it from other -Newari 007 (talk) 00:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

  Not done. The deleted article was a test page with no content worth restoring. Since you created it in the first place, I recommend you use your sandbox instead to create similar pages. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Federico Pistono

There is a new draft on this person. Please restore the original article to my user space so that, as an AFC reviewer, I can see whether the draft is better than the deleted version. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC) -Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Petroleum Planetary

Because i am fucking official -Danishjhatial (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Xasma

I, SOADNICK, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SOADNICK (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Zoffy

This page was deleted long ago in 2013 due to the lack of citations and revived as a redirect to the page Ultraman. I wish to revive this page's content with proper citations so it can met the criteria standards of the wikipedia. -Zero stylinx (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoffy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crossbreed Supersoul

I, Jeychester, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeychester (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

@Jeychester:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Crossbreed Supersoul. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The article needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability; see also WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 13:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamo Shaman's Story

I, 72.204.16.125, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 72.204.16.125 (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

This is a great book that needs a synopsis -72.204.16.125 (talk) 01:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  • This was restored back in March, but no edits were made after I restored it last. We need some sort of assurance that the article will be worked on before it can be restored a second time. Wikipedia is not a place for indefinitely hosting material. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. H. G. Desai

I, Geareffect, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geareffect (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

It was stated that there were not enough references. Wish to add references and removed unreferenced information. -Geareffect (talk) 00:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Creately

I'm working for Creately and I have gathered credible sources/citations to support the article -113.59.200.3 (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. You will still need to improve the article or Velella may seek further deletion. Also, please read over WP:COI before making any edits to the article. It would also be very recommended for you to open up an account prior to editing further. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Cleopatra Enterprise

I, 213.127.139.58, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 213.127.139.58 (talk) 08:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Not done It looks like at least part of the information on the page was taken verbatim or nearly verbatim from this website, which makes it a copyright violation. The article is also borderline promotional in places, so that's also an issue although not one that's so major that I wouldn't restore it for that reason. (It is major enough that it would be deleted in the mainspace as unambiguous promotion, however, so this really would need to be fixed.) If you have an article with e-mail enabled I can send you a copy of the content, but I cannot restore this given the WP:COPYVIO. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Gala Wilton F.C.

The article was deleted through PROD with a concern about the notability. However, whoever PRODed it appears to have failed to have notified its main contributors: the user who wrote it (Norman777111) and the user who accepted it at AfC (SwisterTwister). Given that the article had already been speedied, re-submitted to AfC and then accepted by an uninvolved reviewer, and was for all intents and purposes a well developed article (apart from the notability concern), I don't think one could in good faith assume that deleting it would be "uncontroversial". The user who created it recently came back to expand it and I believe they should be given the chance to do so, and the article should at least go through an AfD if there are still concerns regarding its notability. -Joe Roe (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Joe Roe:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Number 57 (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Bojana Bojanić

I need this acrticle back since I still need to add more sources and the page is for information use only. -Milesq (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Milesq:   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojana Bojanić, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fodi_Laishu_Yaar

We were not aware of the username guidelines and page source guidelines, now we have created it and are learning to create it as per guidelines -Nisharshraj (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Comment I've blocked this editor as a sock of User:Fly team. WP:Not here, shared account, persistent attempts to promote this film Jimfbleak (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Yung Q

This artist has been signed to major label and is verified on all social media has sold over a million albums on iTunes and is all found online this artist needs a wiki -Legitballin41 (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Legitballin41:   Declined. Being "signed" to a major label is not a claim of notability; he must have released at least 2 albums under that label. iTunes sales are not a claim of notability. Coverage in social media is not a claim of notability. Unless you can argue specifically what criteria in WP:MUSICBIO are met, the article won't be restored. And because it was deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Q, it is ineligible for restoration by request here. Please state your case to the deleting administrator Northamerica1000. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for reinstatement of Draft: The Higher Education Quality Council page

I would like to continue editing this page. I am now in a position to complete the article Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Lifewider (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Software MacKiev

Software MacKiev is a developer and publisher of well-known consumer and educational software titles. This page should not have been deleted. Will review notability when it is restored to see what might be improved. "Save page" button below -16:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Jack Minsky (talk)

Draft:American Journal of Undergraduate Research

I, Editor of AJUR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Editor of AJUR (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

ICCG

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Prikunj Sharma (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

I need to get that Article back as this was just for Information Purpose, not for advertisement and other purpose and i am also trying to add more details and References in that.

  •   Not done This was deleted because of WP:G11 concerns by BethNaught and Kuru. There's also a draft at Draft:ICCG. Offhand this was extremely promotional and before this can even be considered for the mainspace again you must remove the WP:PUFFERY and source it with independent and reliable soruces. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

William Herp

Recently deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Herp. I asked the closing admin for a userified copy, but they stated they don't do userification. Thus, I came here. Can I please get a copy of the deleted article put here: User:Silver seren/William Herp? -SilverserenC 19:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

@Silver seren: Article and its talk page have been userfied to User:Silver seren/William Herp. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_244&oldid=1138664214"