Archive Archived discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Proposed deletion of C. K. Manisankar edit

 

The article C. K. Manisankar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

missing edit

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The article St. Teresa's Convent Girls' Higher Secondary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no indication of Notability. The WP:NSCHOOL criteria have been made much stricter since this article was created.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Business Standard for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Business Standard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Business Standard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.parvage (talk) 11:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve MM TV edit

Hello, Thunderboltz,

Thank you for creating MM TV.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please have a look at WP:ORGCRIT. Independent sources are required. Currently all sources are MM-produced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Викидим}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Викидим (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply