Renamed user df576567etesddf
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Renamed user df576567etesddf has not edited Wikipedia since 22 January 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced edit
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Have your say! edit
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018 edit
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018 edit
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Cliftonian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Cliftonian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018 edit
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Military history WikiProject World War I Op-Ed Series edit
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| In recognition of the role you played in cleaning up my God-awful spelling and grammar in the World War I Op-Ed series published by the Military history WikiProject's newsletter The Bugle over the last four years, I hereby present you with this teamwork barnstar. It is thanks to so many different editors like you who took the time to copyedit the nearly four year long series that it ended up being as successful as it was, and I am grateful for your help since spelling and grammar are not my strongest suites. Yours sincerely, TomStar81 (Talk) 14:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC) |
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards edit
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards edit
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018 edit
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Austral season's greetings edit
|
Austral season's greetings |
| Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019 edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
S.M. Stirling edit
I reverted your edit; he was born in France. His own bio-sketch on his books describes him as French-born. Tarl N. (discuss) 19:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, it says "born in France" (reference to place of birth), which is not the same as "French-born" (which implies nationality at birth). Please read my edit summary again and have a look at WP:OPENPARA. Cheers — Cliftonian (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies, the relevant page is now at MOS:OPENPARABIO (it's been a while!). In particular the line "Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability." Cheers — Cliftonian (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- From Amazon.com's self-written bio:
I'm a writer by trade, born in France but Canadian by origin and American by naturalization, living in New Mexico at present. My hobbies are mostly related to the craft -- I love history, anthropology and archaeology, and am interested in the sciences. The martial arts are my main physical hobby.
- You are correct, it says born in France rather than French-born, and I wouldn't take is askance if you changed the phraseology (as far as I'm concerned, the exact phraseology is a minor issue - I don't know whether he has rights to French citizenship or not, because even though France is one of the few European Jus Soli nations, there are restrictions which I haven't dug into). But his birthplace is evidently part of his identity, given that in his fifty-word life summary he spends three words on that. I think removing it entirely is incorrect. Tarl N. (discuss) 19:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK, well let's put "Canadian-American" and "born in France" in that case, matching his own description. Thanks for engaging on this, hope this resolves the matter. Cheers — Cliftonian (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- That works. I suspect the reason it's important to him, is that while his original citizenship was Canadian, he didn't grow up in Canada. He's now an American citizen (as of about 15 years ago), but that was explicitly by naturalization - he's lived here since dropping his law career and his wife is American, but given his background, the label "American author" doesn't fit quite right. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 20:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK, well let's put "Canadian-American" and "born in France" in that case, matching his own description. Thanks for engaging on this, hope this resolves the matter. Cheers — Cliftonian (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- You are correct, it says born in France rather than French-born, and I wouldn't take is askance if you changed the phraseology (as far as I'm concerned, the exact phraseology is a minor issue - I don't know whether he has rights to French citizenship or not, because even though France is one of the few European Jus Soli nations, there are restrictions which I haven't dug into). But his birthplace is evidently part of his identity, given that in his fifty-word life summary he spends three words on that. I think removing it entirely is incorrect. Tarl N. (discuss) 19:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary edit
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
Happy 2019! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Seven - miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
William Harper (Rhodesian politician) scheduled for TFA edit
This is to let you know that the William Harper (Rhodesian politician) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 22, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 22, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. "When looking back on Rhodesian history and the UDI period in particular, it's often assumed that 1965's UDI occurred after circumstances contrived to put the lunatic fringe into government—so it may come as a surprise that Ian Smith was actually the more moderate choice for Prime Minister in 1964. Rhodesia could easily instead have been led by William Harper, a Calcutta-born segregationist who thought Indian independence a folly and wanted to strip black Rhodesians of what little political representation they had. Harper left the Rhodesian Front under something of a cloud in 1968, apparently after being caught having an affair with an MI6 agent, and the rest of his political career essentially amounted to giving indignant quotes to the Rhodesian press every time Smith moved towards any kind of conciliation with the black nationalists. By the time of the Internal Settlement elections of 1979, Harper was settled in South Africa, where he seems to have lived out the rest of his days in obscurity. He died in 2006." - RIP Johnny Clegg. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Rhodesian diarists has been nominated for splitting edit
Category:Rhodesian diarists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)