User talk:Pamzeis/Archive/2022

Ok thank u for alerting me i wasn't aware

Ok thank u for alerting me. I wasn't aware Newzkid (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Good to know Newzkid (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

RE: January 2022

Good morning, Pamezeis. The information was cited, however not correctly. I have hopefully fixed that. Thank you for pointing it out. I am a new user and I trying my best to contribute correctly. Sherapower99 (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)sherapower99

DYK for Miya Cech

On 5 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miya Cech, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Miya Cech was praised for "do[ing] what [she] can with nothing" in the ill-regarded The Darkest Minds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miya Cech. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Miya Cech), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Zoe Colletti

On 6 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zoe Colletti, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after offering to be an extra in The Walking Dead, Zoe Colletti was cast as a main character in its spin-off Fear the Walking Dead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zoe Colletti. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zoe Colletti), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Woody (Toy Story) GA review

Hey, I think I've done everything based off your GA review for Woody (Toy Story) so I think you can check it over again. Note I didn't remove one of the inside the magic references because I cant find any other source stating that Toy Story Mania is in Tokyo Sea. Is it find if its just establishing that something exist. Also Im looking in on the Attractions Magazine ref. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 01:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

@Kaleeb18: Do you believe that the review is ready for a second look? From the looks of your message, it seems that you think so but feel the sourcing still needs work. Pamzeis (talk) 04:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

I’ll tell you again here. I guess I’m just waiting for information WP:RSN gives me on attractions Magazine from what I can tell it looks fine to me but that’s me. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 12:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

You can check it again WP:RSN said Attractions Magazine is reliable for theme park related things. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 21:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Us Again (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Us Again (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Us Again (film)

The article Us Again (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Us Again (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

The little mermaid

the page you say is Fake is completely real. A lot of news they give is real. 2806:10BE:9:1B52:C00B:4F90:8ED3:65D6 (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shaylee Mansfield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shaylee Mansfield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shaylee Mansfield

The article Shaylee Mansfield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shaylee Mansfield for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shaylee Mansfield

The article Shaylee Mansfield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shaylee Mansfield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cutie Map

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Cutie Map you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cutie Map

The article The Cutie Map you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Cutie Map for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cutie Map

The article The Cutie Map you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Cutie Map for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I'ma editor2022 -- I'ma editor2022 (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic)

The article Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of I'ma editor2022 -- I'ma editor2022 (talk) 23:41, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Excellent job on making List of The Good Place episodes a featured list. You forking nailed it. FrB.TG (talk) 18:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! That was so long ago... I have a happy stomachache! Pamzeis (talk) 02:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mirabel Madrigal

On 30 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mirabel Madrigal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Encanto's Mirabel is the first Disney heroine to wear glasses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mirabel Madrigal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mirabel Madrigal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

GA Review of: Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic)

Hi,

Please look at the GA review of Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic), to see some changes I made to it, and some faults I did not "catch". Your article still passed, but needs some neccesary changes. | Remember, Imurmate (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Madrigal family

Hello! Your submission of Madrigal family at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. This issue is due to the merge proposal at Talk:Encanto (film), which I know you've been pinged into but I am taking opportunity to make note about it here as well. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 20:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion: FAC 4 nomination of nonmetal

Please accept this note as an invitation to participate in the discussion of this latest FAC nomination for the nonmetal article.

The context is that you were involved in the FAC 3 discussion for the article (which was not prompted) or you are an editor who made a recent edit to the nonmetal article.

Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 07:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sandbh: Thank you for the invite, but I don't think I fit into either of those categories... I definitely didn't discuss anything about the FAC, prompted or unprompted, nor did I make an edit to nonmetal... the only related I think I can remember making is fixing a header on the FAC... So, uh, why did you notify me...? BTW, I don't plan on participating in the FAC, given I have absolutely no interest. Sorry. Pamzeis (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

You made an edit to FAC 3, as per you recollection. Thanks for the ping and declining the invite. I completely understand. Sandbh (talk) 07:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Cutie Map

On 4 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Cutie Map, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes are said to discuss Marxism and Stalinism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Cutie Map. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Cutie Map), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Madrigal family.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madrigal family.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic) Talk Page Comment

@Pamzeis: Hi!

Could you please respond on my Friendship Is Magic (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic) Talk Page message? Or please fix the requested edit? I would do it myself, but since it is your article, and you may oppose it I would love to hear your opinions on the matter, since it seems like you have become a bit more active today, atleast according to your contributions list. | Remember, Imurmate (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maui (Moana)

Hello, Pamzeis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maui (Moana), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

GA Barnstar

GA Barnstar

I know you only give this to someone who got a GA, but without your review it would have never become a GA. Thank you for looking over that article 5 long times! At least you can tell all your friends everything you know about Woody now lol. I appreciate the detailed reviews you gave. Also there is no way I will forget to italicize things now after that review. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 12:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

LOL, thanks I don't think I've ever talked about Woody with my friends though. Pamzeis (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, now you can lol. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 00:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Shaylee Mansfield

On 10 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shaylee Mansfield, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at age 12, Shaylee Mansfield became the first deaf actor to be credited alongside the voice actors for a signed performance in an animated production? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shaylee Mansfield. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shaylee Mansfield), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:We Can Be Heroes 2

Hello, Pamzeis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:We Can Be Heroes 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Shaylee Mansfield Page

Thank you so much for setting up Shaylee Mansfield's Wikipedia page up! :o) All lovely to read. She'll have a new guest appearance coming up - will keep you in loop. AND is it possible to add photos?73.137.202.10 (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

You're very welcome! Regarding new appearances, please make sure that you verify the information with a reliable source. Regarding image(s), it/they would have to be freely licensed, meaning that copyrighted images are a no-no. My searches aren't bringing up any free images, so if you can find one, see Special:Upload to, um, upload it. Cheers, Pamzeis (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

You're awesome! I'm not familiar with this world - how can I help you find the best photos (without violating the license or CR) to put on her Wikipedia page? I tried to upload, but failed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marie284 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@Marie284: The image you uploaded appears to have been taken from the internet. Everything is assumed to be copyrighted unless it is explicitly said that it is properly licensed. However, even if something is licensed, there are certain licenses that aren't acceptable on Wikimedia. See C:Commons:Licensing for more information, but in a nutshell, we accept public domain, CC0, CC BY and CC BY-SA-licensed images. You can find such images on the internet, but they must be explicitly licensed (that came out harsh). Sites like Flickr can be a useful place to start (though my search was unsuccessful). Another way images can be free is if their copyright has expired (not possible for her, but if it was published before 1927, then their copyright has expired). There's also images that are produced by the US government, which are automatically public domain, though the government is unlikely to have produced an image of Mansfield at the moment. Lastly, if you have an image of your own work, you can upload it and license it, meaning that anybody can reuse it (for free, I think?). I... think that's everything. That was exhausting to type up Pamzeis (talk) 12:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Definitly exhausting and so difficult! Thanks for trying! Hopefully one day there can be a picture or two up there somehow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marie284 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:My Little Pony (2022 TV series)

Hello, Pamzeis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Little Pony (2022 TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Fan editor research interview

I don't know if we've ever actually 'met' (so to speak), but my name is Gen. Quon, and I'm an editor who usually works on X-Files, The Office, or Adventure Time articles. I'm currently also working on my PhD in library science, and my dissertation is on the information behaviors of fan editors. (Here's a more detailed outline of my project, if you'd like to read about it!) My work will largely be autoethnographic, meaning that I'm taking notes about what I do, but I'm also wanting to work qualitative interviewing into the works. In that regard, I've mostly been reaching out to editors whom I have worked with in the past, but I also don't want to bias the results by just focusing on my lil circle of Wikipedia. I noticed your interest in improving MLP articles (btw, I'm proud to say that I helped create one of the first MLP:FiM episode articles on the site!) and was wondering if you'd be interested in chatting with me about your info experiences as a fan editor? Basically, how do you find sources, how do you work them into articles, why do you edit--that sort of thing. I'm more than happy to provide any additional info if you'd like it! Thanks!!--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 17:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@Gen. Quon: Hi! Sorry for the late reply... responding to this was on my to-do list but I guess I just forgot. I'm not great at answering questions and think for a reeeeaaaaally long time about simple ones, so... I was trying to answer these for, like, an hour. And I was unsuccessful in trying to figure out my editing process, because most things that I come across are found by accident, so yeah. Sorry. Pamzeis (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@Pamzeis: I totally get that! If you are at all interested, I'd be more than happy to just send you my questions via email, to which you can answer at your leisure. My 'deadline', so to speak, is around May of this year, so there's time on my end. But of course, if you're just not feelin', that's cool too! Just wanted to offer. Thanks!!--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 14:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Animation Barnstar
		I was trying to think of a barnstar to give you but you do so much of everything it's hard to pick. All your work on animation-related articles is especially amazing though, so have a barnstar! Thanks for being so awesome BuySomeApples (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I really DK what to say. ​Pamzeis (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of A Canterlot Wedding

Congratulations, Pamzeis! The article you nominated, A Canterlot Wedding, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Buidhe (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

MOS reminder

Just a kind reminder that using things such as "Canadian-American television series" in the lead sections of TV articles is disallowed due to MOS:TVNATIONALITY. I've removed it from Magical Mystery Cure and a few other articles you worked on. Just want you to be aware of this in the future as you work on more MLP episode articles. wizzito | say hello! 10:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder I'm very much aware of the guideline. And to answer your question about how the article became a GA with the "Canadian-American" thing, it's pretty simple: MOS:TV is not part of the GA criteria (though the reviewer asked for other things to be fixed that were not part of the GA criteria, so I supposed we'll never know...)​ Pamzeis (talk) 10:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Us Again (film)

On 5 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Us Again (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, for the animated film Us Again, director and writer Zach Parrish considered a video of an elderly couple dancing to be visceral and ideal inspiration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Us Again (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Us Again (film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 21:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Isabela Madrigal

On 6 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isabela Madrigal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Encanto's Isabela Madrigal was animated to be aware that she is "always on stage"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isabela Madrigal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Isabela Madrigal), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TeenAngels1234 -- TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)

The article Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TeenAngels1234 -- TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:21, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Encanto

About your edit, I really think the characters do know that they're singing. Why else would you be dancing with donkeys or have everybody in the entire town singing? SteelerFan1933 (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You can discuss this on the talk page, but the film is a musical. I can't really explain it well, so here goes nothing: our belief is suspended during musicals, and we don't usually question why characters suddenly just break into song, as we're used to it. But the fact that they are "singing" is not relevant to the plot for Encanto. Films like Coco, for example, mention that the characters are singing because it's integral to the plot. If you compare the way, say, "Remember Me" and "Surface Pressure" are introduced, you'll see big differences. Luisa just begins singing as though she's talking without really knowing what she's singing, while Miguel picks up a guitar and full-on knows he's singing. The visuals mostly seem to be the character's imaginations...​ Pamzeis (talk) 01:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I see.SteelerFan1933 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

And about my new edits I now understand that all songs are irrelevant in musicals. It also may interest you that I also found somebody who added a link to We Don't Talk About Bruno, which I removed.

Sincerely,

Camilo Madrigal (Not my real name) SteelerFan1933 (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Wishing Spell (film)

Hello, Pamzeis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wishing Spell (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Far from the Tree (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Far from the Tree (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Wishing Spell (film)

Hello, Pamzeis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wishing Spell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Far from the Tree (film)

The article Far from the Tree (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Far from the Tree (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 13:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: XO, Kitty has been accepted

XO, Kitty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 14:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of XO, Kitty

Hello! Your submission of XO, Kitty at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 01:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Ain't Easy Being Breezies

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article It Ain't Easy Being Breezies you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for helping Total Recall become a Featured Article. Your efforts on quite a few of my recent promotions has not gone unnoticed, thank you again! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 13:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Darkwarriorblake! If there is anything else I can help with, just drop me a message! Pamzeis (talk) 14:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

There will always be more to help with :) Just wish we got paid to do this! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 14:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Ain't Easy Being Breezies

The article It Ain't Easy Being Breezies you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:It Ain't Easy Being Breezies for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 02:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Half-Blood Prince GA Review

Hello Pamzeis. Hope you are doing well. I have responded to all the comments raised in the review, and have a few queries, which I have mentioned on the review page. I pinged you a couple of times, as I had finished responding to the first set of comments over a week ago. Just wanted to know when you will continue. Thanks, Kpddg ^(talk) 13:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi again. I have responded to the further comments raised in the review. Thanks, Kpddg ^(talk) 14:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I'll get to it by the 27th. I'm just trying make sure I'm not missing anything. ​Pamzeis (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Sure, just wanted to let you know. Kpddg ^(talk) 14:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Pamzeis, I have finished the review. Kpddg ^(talk) 14:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for this review! Kpddg ^(talk) 06:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of List of accolades received by Encanto (film)

Congratulations, Pamzeis! The list you nominated, List of accolades received by Encanto (film), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, nice to meet you. i hope we can talk together soon : ) Pinkie ^Hangout 09:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for XO, Kitty

On 30 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article XO, Kitty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that XO, Kitty, based on the film series To All the Boys I've Loved Before, is planned to be the first Netflix series to be spun off from a Netflix original film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/XO, Kitty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, XO, Kitty), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Melissa Fumero

On 31 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melissa Fumero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brooklyn Nine-Nine actress Melissa Fumero is the daughter of Cubans who fled to the U.S. as teenagers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melissa Fumero. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Melissa Fumero), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,702 views (529.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

It's been a long time. Pamzeis (talk) 03:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brooklyn Nelson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brooklyn Nelson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. UnidentifiedX (talk) 11:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mirabel Madrigal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mirabel Madrigal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 01:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mirabel Madrigal

The article Mirabel Madrigal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mirabel Madrigal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

My information is not wrong!

I clearly know that Netflix is still showing Seasons 1-4 of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. Furthermore, the words "The series is set to be removed from Netflix on January 31, 2022" shouldn't say that anymore because it's already after January 31, 2022. I even gave a source from the official Netflix website with clear evidence. So my information is 100% correct, and those revertings against my edits were nothing but brutality. Jonghyunchung (talk) 01:51, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sophia Reid-Gantzert

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sophia Reid-Gantzert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BetaWizard6742 -- BetaWizard6742 (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of Shaylee Mansfield

Congratulations, Pamzeis! The article you nominated, Shaylee Mansfield, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! It is really great to see a 12 year old having a featured article! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

She's thirteen now, but your point still stands! Probably the youngest person alive with a featured article. ​Pamzeis (talk) 05:34, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Clements twins at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 20:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sophia Reid-Gantzert

On 3 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sophia Reid-Gantzert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Baby-Sitters Club actress Sophia Reid-Gantzert won an Austrian ballet competition when she was six? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sophia Reid-Gantzert. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sophia Reid-Gantzert), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
• Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
• Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Wizards of Waverly Place FAC

Hi, I appreciated your review on the Hannah Montana FAC back in January. If possible, I would greatly appreciate a comment on my Wizards of Waverly Place FAC if you have the time. I understand if you are unable to. Thanks in advance. SatDis (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Madrigal family.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madrigal family.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

About your deletion of my edit on Clements twins

Hello,

I notice that you have deleted some of my changes on Clements twins.

I know that they are unsourced, but all of the claims come from the Clements twins' own website, and I do not have the resources necessary right now to cite the sources and put them on the article.

So if it doesn't trouble you, kindly restore my edits with the template that says "no sources cited" or something like that, or restore my changes and add the sources, which again, can be found on their website (clementstwins.com I think).

Thanks! HKLionel (talk) 11:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

I just noticed that you didn't substantially change anything, sorry!

So about the things that you removed:

I have reconsidered and although "Ava and Leah" is substantially used, "Clements twins" is still their official name.

As for the fact that they were born one minute apart from each other, this, again, can be found on their website.

Am I too formal 😂

Thanks! HKLionel (talk) 12:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Clements twins

On 29 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clements twins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Clements twins have an estimated revenue of almost US$6000 per Instagram post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clements twins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clements twins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,957 views (913 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Vivien Lyra Blair

On 31 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vivien Lyra Blair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Vivien Lyra Blair's performance was deemed "just absurd" in the Netflix film We Can Be Heroes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vivien Lyra Blair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vivien Lyra Blair), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Shaylee Mansfield. — Bilorv (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

By the way, per your comment, I don't think there's any period of limitation on Four Awards. Congrats on your first one! — Bilorv (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Sophia Reid-Gantzert moved to draftspace

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sophia Reid-Gantzert

The article Sophia Reid-Gantzert you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sophia Reid-Gantzert for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BetaWizard6742 -- BetaWizard6742 (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brooklyn Nelson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brooklyn Nelson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 18:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brooklyn Nelson

The article Brooklyn Nelson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brooklyn Nelson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia the First

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sofia the First you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia the First

The article Sofia the First you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sofia the First for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sofia the First

The article Sofia the First you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sofia the First for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaleeb18 -- Kaleeb18 (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vivien Lyra Blair

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vivien Lyra Blair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vivien Lyra Blair

The article Vivien Lyra Blair you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vivien Lyra Blair for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vivien Lyra Blair

The article Vivien Lyra Blair you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vivien Lyra Blair for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Vivien Lyra Blair - The Play Date

What was the problem with my edit? I wrote the source there, so you could check. According to IMDb she was in the film. I would like to know what the problem was with my edit. Mate Polcz (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Mate Polcz. Thank you for your contributions! As I explained in my edit summary, WP:IMDB is not a reliable source, as it is user-generated by non-professionals. If you can find a reliable source (a reputable newspaper/magazine or something like that), you can feel free to add it to the article or leave it here. Happy editing! Pamzeis (talk) 07:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for you reply, I'll try to find one. Mate Polcz (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Pamzeis. I'm just posting to let you know that List of The Good Place episodes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Melissa Fumero

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Melissa Fumero you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 21:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sofia the First

On 4 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sofia the First, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sofia the First was deemed "risky" but subsequently became the most-viewed program in its category? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sofia the First. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sofia the First), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,756 views (563.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

TFA

Hi, I'm thinking of running Shaylee Mansfield as WP:TFA on October 27. Please let me know as soon as possible if you don't want it to run on that date, thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi! I'd be fine with running on that date, but I was thinking we could possibly run the article during the International Week of the Deaf next year? I dunno, I'm fine with either. ​Pamzeis (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Fine with me, I suggest that you list at WP:TFARP. A date range is acceptable Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Melissa Fumero

The article Melissa Fumero you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Melissa Fumero for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Please see Article “Emma Laird”

… for a failed link 🤗 agreeing with you. Sorry. Left Central (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

The School for Good and Evil IMDb Cast Information

Hi Pamzeis, apologies for the edits regarding cast information. I didn't realise The School for Good and Evil hasn't had its premiere yet, I read articles and posts that said it premiered in London, one from Kit Young's Twitter page who's top billed cast on the official theatrical release poster https://mobile.twitter.com/kittheyounger/status/1577244743246893056 https://www.celebsofworld.com/2022/10/sofia-wylie-at-the-school-for-good-and-evil-premiere-in-london-10-03-2022.html https://www.hawtcelebs.com/sofia-wylie-at-the-school-for-good-and-evil-premiere-in-london-10-03-2022/ But I now wonder if this is a mistake and this didn't take place? Apologies if this is an error. Wikipedia rules only allow certain information to be sourced from IMDb, such as cast members, from films which have premiered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_IMDb If the film has had its premiere screening in London and this isn't a mistake, this would mean IMDb is allowed to be used as a reliable source for certain information such a cast. Paisleyprince (talk) 14:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Paisleyprince. So, first things first, I believe the film has premiered in London, but I can't find any reliable secondary sources to support that claim, and the cast's social medias do not seem like enough. So for the cast list. It's worth noting that WP:CITEIMDB is an essay, not a policy or guideline, and there isn't a precedent for following it. But according to that page, it is disputed to use IMDb for cast lists and not really considered appropriate. Secondly, the film itself would be an acceptable WP:PRIMARY source for the cast list iff it was available to the public. As far as I'm aware, its premiere in London was only available to the cast and crew. Per WP:PRIMARY, A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge, so none of these claims can be verified because the film is not available publicly, so no one has "access" to the film at the moment. Lemme know if you have any other questions regarding this matter. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Amy Santiago

On 20 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amy Santiago, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brooklyn Nine-Nine character Amy Santiago has straight hair because the show's two Latina regular cast members feared that one of them would be fired? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amy Santiago. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amy Santiago), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,657 views (721.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 09:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

• Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
• Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
• BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
• Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
• Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
• Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
• PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
• Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

• Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
• Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
• Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
• Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
• Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
• SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
• Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
• Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
• Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
• Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
329		Chloë Agnew (talk)	Add sources
235		101 Dalmatian Street (talk)	Add sources
16		Hsiao Ho (actor) (talk)	Add sources
1,669		Botulinum toxin (talk)	Add sources
86		Jack Hannah (talk)	Add sources
20		Kate Forsyth (talk)	Add sources
185		Fergusson University (talk)	Cleanup
2,554		Britt Robertson (talk)	Cleanup
415		De-aging in film (talk)	Cleanup
363		Social distancing (talk)	Expand
4,579		Elena of Avalor (talk)	Expand
24		Pinobee: Wings of Adventure (talk)	Expand
37		Donald's Quack Attack (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10,768		Hindi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
58		Some Thoughts Concerning Education (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
409		The Wire (India) (talk)	Merge
22		Disney Junior (Southern African TV channel) (talk)	Merge
839		Endemic COVID-19 (talk)	Merge
254		Beaver dam (talk)	Wikify
54		Brihan Maharashtra College of Commerce (talk)	Wikify
92		Joe Grant (talk)	Wikify
1		Donald Alexander Cochrane (talk)	Orphan
3		Andrew Barnett (talk)	Orphan
2		Al-Khirbah (talk)	Orphan
6		Kalappanaickenpatti (talk)	Stub
34		Voyage of the Little Mermaid (talk)	Stub
60		Snake River Canyon (Idaho) (talk)	Stub
20		Hi-Diddle-Dee-Dee (talk)	Stub
41		Barichara (talk)	Stub
22		Yale Gracey (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maui (Moana) has been accepted

Maui (Moana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)