Talk:Brooklyn Nelson

Improving Page

Please address concerns for this page on the talk page. It's possible that this page contains some research deficiencies and this page is an appropriate place to address them. Yaakov bressler (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Brooklyn at the beach.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brooklyn Nelson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 11:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Pamzeis: I will be reviewing the article. Please allow 1-3 days for the assessment to be completed.

Notified

The nominator has been notified of the ongoing review.

Assessment

1. Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

2. Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

3. Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

4. Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

5. Stability:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

6. Illustration:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Please read the comments below
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Please read the comments below

Comments

Illustration

One of the main things I immediately noticed is that this article does not contain any images or media. Unfortunately, this is one of the 6 good article criteria. It is widely suggested that a GA classed article contains pictures; if you need any assistance adding one please notify me and I will be hapy to help - UnidentifiedX (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately, no free images of Nelson are available at the moment; a non-free one would fail WP:NFCC#8, as Nelson's appearance is not significant in any form. Per the GA criteria, Illustrated, if possible, by media (emphasis mine).​ Pamzeis (talk) 13:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

UnidentifiedX? Pamzeis (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for the wait. Thanks for your response, totally understandable. I appreciate some articles can't be illustrated by media. I'll continue the assessment shortly. UnidentifiedX (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Early life

- “She has a younger sister” Who?

• Well, her name is Lacey (according to the refs), but I do not think the readers would benefit much from knowing her name...

- “she appeared in several local productions by First Stage, Curtain Up Players and the Huntington Regional Theater” You could give examples. However I am happy to leave it as it is right now.

• Well, since The Little Mermaid has already been mentioned, there's only one example I can give, which would seem a little bare in my opinion

- “As of 2018, she lives in New York City with her mother and sister.” As a curious reader, what happened to the dad?

• He probably stayed West Virginia or something, but no source mentions it...

@UnidentifiedX: Responded to your comments Pamzeis (talk) 03:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, UnidentifiedX. When can I expect more comments? I am fine with waiting for a longer period of time, but I am only asking because it has been over a week since I responded to your previous comments. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 04:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

UnidentifiedX? Pamzeis (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

 Note: I have relisted this article at the nominations page as the reviewer has not responded to my pings, having not edited in over a month. Pamzeis (talk) 06:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brooklyn Nelson/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 17:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

No images to review; sources are reliable.

• No sourcing is given in the film section. I know the sources are already given above, but they should also be added here.
  •  Done
• "as a Small Girl Swing": why the upper case for Small Girl? If it's because that's the cast credit, it's fine to make this lower case. And "swing" is jargon; it would be best to explain this when used or find another way to say it, perhaps using "understudy", which is more widely understood.
  •  Done
  •  Added an explanatory footnote

That's everything; the prose is straightforward and meets GA standards. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: Responded to your comments Pamzeis (talk) 11:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Looks good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)