User talk:Killervogel5/Archive 8

Mets–Phillies rivalry

Impressive quantity of content. I'll start my GA review either tonight or tomorrow. 02:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Reply at User talk:Allen4names

Hello, Killervogel5. You have new messages at Allen4names's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- allen四names 04:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Pittsburgh Pirates

I'm not overly concerned about it, but I would appreciate some clarification here. Thanks, 71.162.31.196 (talk) 06:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

non-free images

I nominated two images for deletion. I need your opinions here.--KANESUE 11:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC) My English may be inappropriate, because I am Japanese.

Heh?

Whatever happened to this? ResMar 14:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah ok then, I'll finish out the tabs and you can run with it. Got so many things I can do right now, makes me downright gidddy ^^. ResMar 14:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I've comepleted the tab rack :) Enjoy. ResMar 15:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Pete Rose

Please do not change WikiProject assessments unless you are familiar with that project's criteria. Each WikiProject rates their articles differently...WP:PW requires an article to be completely sourced with in-line citations before it can be a B class. Thanks. Nikki♥311 21:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

It is the job of the WikiProject's assessment team to change the ratings for their articles. Nikki♥311 21:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Did you read WP:ASSESS? It states: It is vital that people do not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we all have different priorities and different opinions about what makes a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as this. Many projects have an assessment team. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment. WikiProjects are allowed to organize their assessments whatever way they want to keep themselves organized. For example, A-class and List-class are optional. Also, WP:SCHOOLS has an assessment team of several editors that require the editors to post their assessments changes above a certain class or importance, to make sure there is consensus for the change. Also, if you look under the B-criteria at WP:ASSESS, it clearly states: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. If you look at the article example, it is thoroughly referenced. Nikki♥311 23:16, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches

Hey man, thanks for reviewing List of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks. Without your help, we wouldn't have yet another featured list here! As a follow-up to that list, you may have noticed that I have now nominated List of Minnesota Vikings head coaches for featured list status. I would therefore like to ask you to make a couple of comments about that list, provided that you have enough spare time on your hands. Many thanks. – PeeJay 10:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

RFA?

I was looking at your contributions closely and I feel that you are well-qualifed for WP:RFA, interested in a nomination. Thanks Secret ^account 14:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Finished with my co-nomination. Was going to create it but was edit conflicted by Staxringold :p. Secret ^account 18:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Just letting you know the RFA starts when you finish the answers to the questions. Seem like your thinking ;). Thanks Secret ^account 18:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Riddle

Q. How many Wikipedia editors does it take to get a date right?
[1] [2] [3]
A. Evidently, at least three. Sorry about that. Good luck. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Obviously :-D. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Lidge

His middle name is no longer Thomas, it is now Blown save. Why did you revert the edit?

I will no longer make edits on the Lidge page. However, his loss in Game 4 of the 2009 World Series was particularly critical in the context of the World Series and should be treated as such. By eliminating the context, it minimizes the significance of the event and it appears to bias the article in favor of Lidge.

I understand that you are a fan of the Phillies and Brad Lidge, and you also have the power to control the contents of Lidge's page. I will respect your preferences and wishes and leave his page alone from now on. DanielSong39 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Request

Hey dude, I'm sure you are very busy with RL and your RfA, but when you get the chance can you review Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of members of the Basketball Hall of Fame/archive1? No obligation, but it's been languishing at FLC for almost a month and a half, and I think one more review could push it over the top. Only if you get the chance. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

I looked at it the other day. Didn't really "review", but I'll try later on today if I've got a few minutes, if for no other reason than to clear it off the docket before the next bot run. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

...for your correction. I spent the last three hours in a meeting where my fingers positively froze. Good luck on your RfA. Drmies (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

FLC

Hi KV5! I saw the tag in the top of your talk page, but: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2007 Pan American Games medal table/archive2. :) Felipe Menegaz 02:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I only made a drive-by comment; other reviewers have commented sufficiently for this article to be fully reviewed. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 02:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Could left your opinion (support or oppose)? Felipe Menegaz 02:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Chone Figgins

Can you keep an eye on this since I'm already at three reverts and the article definetely needs more eyes.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 02:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Cubs Opening Day starting pitchers/archive1

Hey, can you revisit this when you have time? Thanks, and congrats (barring a catastrophe) on your RfA. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Done. And thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 00:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Good luck

I just noticed you're up for RfA. Godd luck, I think you deserve it (although you seem to be well on the way). Rlendog (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question

I got told off for it last time, so I don't plan to run it again. You'd lose that personal touch, anyway. (Besides, it's pretty easy with AWB if you really must do it automatically). Dendodge _T\^C 16:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your Request for Adminship

Dear Killervogel5,

I have closed your recent RfA as successful per the consensus of the community. Congratulations, you are now a sysop! Please make sure you're aware of the Administrators' how-to guide and the items on the Administrators' reading list. Finally, please don't hesitate in contacting me if you need anything. Best of luck in your new position! —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 00:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Coldplay Expert

Can you fix your Thanks spam on User talk:Coldplay Expert? I tried adding a post after yours and mine got completely messed up. I think you didn't close something properly. Woogee (talk) 02:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Haha! Too funny - your first admin duty is to break everyone's talk pages... Missing some close brackets or spans I think. Can I change my vote?  7  02:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Public service announcment You can fix the problems with the thankspam template by adding "|}" just before the "</div>" towards the end of the template. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I was about to post a section on this, but everyone else beat me to it... Yes, the |} is what's needed near the end of the template. I noticed it was broken when my Signpost was contained within the thankspam... The thing that should not be 06:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thankspam

You're welcome. Don't consider my vote as a favor to you, consider it as a favor to the Wikipedia community and its readers. :) --Addihockey10^{(review me!)} 04:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats2 ...

...on gaining adminship. I didn't know you were running. But it looks like you had no shortage of help. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

re: your message

Hi KV5 I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 06:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

RE:RFA thankspam

Hey! You're welcome. Congratz on becoming an admin. Happy editing! BejinhanTalk 10:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you please fix RFA thankspam on my Talk page???????????????

Congratz on becoming an admin. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Your thankspam requires a closing statement for the table (i.e. ↓), and a timestamp would help the archive bots know when to take it away.

|}

Congrats on your adminship! –xeno^talk 00:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats, can you fix the thankspam on my page too please? iMatthew ^talk at 02:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Accidental deletion

You wroe: Just wanted to let you know that you deleted my last comment on the above talk page when you added your thoughts. I've restored them, but I just wanted to make you aware. Thanks for your comments. Sorry 'bout that- not sure how I did that. Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats on your recent adminship. Yay for PA! :P  IShadowed  ✰  21:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:

Remember you will always protect the wrong version. Remember you must always follow the rules, except for when you ignore them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5) Remember to assume good faith and not bite. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a troll. Use the block ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block. Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and descriptive terminology. and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able. KillerChihuahua?!?

DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Canadian provinces and territories by area/archive1

Hey there. Can you take a second look at the above FLRC? You !voted "delisted" a few weeks ago, but someone has started to work on the list, so if you could provide further suggestions for improvement, that would be great. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

My main concern from the original nomination (no lead to speak of) still hasn't been addressed, which is why I haven't commented, but I'll leave that on the review page if you'd like. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thanks. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats

Congrats!

To our newest admin.  7  00:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats CAT:CSD is so much fun. Secret ^account 00:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats. Glad you did better than me! Grsz¹¹ 02:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! You deserve it!--Coldplay Expért ^{Let's talk} 02:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• Hey, congrats! So close to breaking into WP:100. :) Staxringold _talk^contribs 02:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Best of luck, and let me know if you ever need help. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

It was my pleasure. Considering all the vandalism, conflict, and sloppy work that's all too common on Wikipedia, it was nice to see a prolific, positive contributor like you seeking adminship. You merited that high level of support. Congratulations and best of luck with the mop. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats and have a T-shirt! I found Wikipedia:New admin school very helpful when I first became an admin, by the way. Let me know if I can ever be of help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! I know you'll do a great job!--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 03:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, Killervogel. May the force be with you. Drmies (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations! ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 03:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• I can't remember the last time someone thanked me for participating in their RfA. ;) You're welcome for the support. Best. Acalamari 03:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• Congratulations! Wear the admin shirt well. Thanks for taking the time to send some thankspam to me :), — Oli ^OR Pyfan! 05:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
• I know the co-nom fella nom'ed and supported, but that always seemed strange to me. As for practicing, I honestly dunno. It's pretty intuitive. Check out WP:AIV honestly if you want to try out a ban. Staxringold _talk^contribs 06:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey there, well done! Let me know if you need any mop wielding advice, provided it's nothing complicated! GedUK  08:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• Congrats from me too. Glad to see such an easily classifiable new admin. ϢereSpielChequers 09:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, --Zink Dawg -- 16:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You might want to remove the buggy thankspam

See for instance User_talk:Shereth#RfA thankspam. The section I added after that gets inserted into the thankspam, despite the {{clear}} tag. (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 16:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

There were several sections posted above showing the fix. Sorry I haven't had time to fix it myself, it took me a lot of time to give it out in the first place. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Should be fixed now. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks much. - Dank (push to talk) 17:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Laughs

No wonder you were busy. I didn't know you had an Rfa going on...ResMar 23:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Latino Legends

I did have a brief part of that, but I did not create the page in question. NoseNuggets (talk) 10:20 AM US EDT Aug 20 2009

Silence equals consensus (World Series MVP article)

I already made most of my point for why I think that it's better for the piped links to be in. Ut really isn't going to matter much because you're still going to do what you want to do regardless of what I'm trying to say on the contrary! Oh, and WP:SILENCE mentions that that's not consensus. TMC1982 (talk 5:43 p.m., 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

For the quick FLC comments. We should try to find better sourcing on the compensatory pick rules, though. Can't be that hard to find. A general rules sheet on Type A/B free agents and such. Staxringold _talk^contribs 19:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

• Poke. :) Staxringold _talk^contribs 03:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Volcanoes list

It's finished, at List of volcanoes in the Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain. I wrote the lead from memory so I have to go ref hunting, and a few other tweaks, however my question is, do FLs neccesarily have to have a sortable feature for the whole list? I'm asking this because the list is broken up into 3 sects. Also, do you think this would pass an FL? Or is it too selective? Like I said, all of the other ones have no more then a coord and a name (a lot don't even have a name). ResMar 16:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it needs to be sortable for the entire list, but I think that those three sections should be their own level-2 sections and be sortable. Using colspans in the list as section headers like that is discouraged now. You're probably going to have to change the individual island subheaders to their own column as well, so they can be sorted. I'm not the authority on content forking, so you can always just go for it and see what the other reviewers say. Your title is going to need a tweak too, by the way. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Uh, the title...? What do you mean there? As for the section headers, yes I know I'm going to have to do that. I thought of splitting the intro too, but can't find a good line to draw. Long intros are ok right? (sorry, this is only my second FL :) ) ResMar 17:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The length of the lead, IMO, is fine. As to the title: because "Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain" shows disjunction, an en-dash is required. Also, because it's a two-part adjective and one part is spaced, the correct title would be "List of volcanoes in the Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain". KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, so I just type in "—" in? Doesn't seem so hard. ResMar 17:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

En-dash, not em-dash, and space it. That's pretty much it. You won't even need to nowiki tag it. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

'K. ResMar 17:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Done. ResMar 18:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

You'll have to change all of the other references in the article to the chain as well (the main article for the chain should be moved anyway). KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean? ResMar 18:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The correct name for any article regarding that chain or any reference thereto is "Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain", so they would all need to be spaced and use an en-dash. You could probably recruit a bot to do it, but better to do it manually for this article. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Happily, no such problem exists, yet. ResMar 18:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, yes it does... Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain right in the lead of this article is wrong. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I thought you meant the refs...ok I'll go between the two and fix them up. While you're here getting bugged by me, I'd like to ask something unrelated; a while ago I listed Kohala (mountain) for GAN, but now that I look back upon it, I think, maybe it's too narrow in scope...what do you think, should it be expanded? ResMar 18:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't see any glaring omissions that I would expect to see in an article about a mountain, but you're definitely the expert. The only mountains I understand are mountains of baseball statistics :-D. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Mountains indeed. This may cause you to hate me, but Yankees woot woot :D ResMar 18:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)<-- New Yorker

I only hate Mets fans... and only ones I know in person. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 18:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't like the Mets either. Call me a picker, but they lose too much :P ResMar 18:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

RE: Phillies/Blue Jays trade

I apologize if I broke the "Crystal Ball violation". I have received mobile alerts from ESPN confirming the trade as well as the contract extension made by the Phillies and Halladay. Thanks, Richie5393 (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Ret.Prof (talk) 00:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec09}} to your friends' talk pages.

Rodrigo Lopez

I demand credit for updating the Rodrigo Lopez page and his signing. I reported this hours ago and it was taken from me. I don't care the fact I did not have a "credible" source (though the source was credible from a beat writer for the Arizona Republic). But I broke the story on Wikipedia.org and I demand credit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.209.97 (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Well

I've made all the changes to List of volcanoes in the Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain. Since you know more about FLs then me, have you got any final remarks before I post it to FL and see how it goes? ResMar 19:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Besides the minor fixes I just made, it looks pretty good right now. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Great. I'll nom it shortly. Let's see waht the community thinks about it :) Btw, I'm expecting to be VERY busy at this point, with Kohala (mountain) GA, Hawaii hotspot FA, and this FL, so...can you help me a little? Or are you too busy...ResMar 19:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Let me know what you need, and I'll try my best. If you're referring to helping with comments raised at the FL nom, I will do so; just link me when you post the FL nom, and I'll watchlist it as well. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of volcanoes in the Hawaiian – Emperor seamount chain/archive1. ResMar 20:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Question on warnings/blocking

If someone has been a vandal in the past and got blocked, waited a while after the block was released, and then vandalized again, what do you do? Do you start them off with a level 1 vandalism warning again, or something higher? Do you have an admin block them again? -HaiyaTheWin IS The Win! 18:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

It really depends on the situation. If it's an IP, erring on the side of caution is best, so I'd start over. If it's a user with a logged-in name, I might start with a level-2 warning. If the vandalism is really severe, and if they've been blocked before, you always have the single-level, 4-im warnings, but those are to be used sparingly. If you have a more specific question or can point me at a page and user that you're referring to, I might be able to help you further. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I was thinking about when I came across an IP adress like that recently, and gave it a level 3, which then was too severe, but nobody said anything or did anything to correct me. I've been worrying about it for a little while, and decided to ask about it. It was IP 70.88.192.101 on Macalester College. Thanks again and Merry Christmas, -HaiyaTheWin IS The Win! 19:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I would assume it's this diff to which you refer. For blatant vandalism of that nature, on an article which that IP has a pattern of editing, it's fairly safe to assume that it was the same editor from the prior warnings, and don't fault you in the slightest for a level-3 warning. I probably would have gone to 2, but I tend to be very conservative with warnings. However, I likely would have gone right from 2 to 4, skipping 3 in between, if I saw the pattern on the same article. I wouldn't worry about it; it appears that you acted prudently, in as good of faith as can be assumed with an IP with a "history", and in the best interests of the encyclopedia. Cheers, and Merry Christmas to you too. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 02:57, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that is the one. Good, and Merry Christmas! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HaiyaTheWin (talk • contribs) 14:32, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

A Nobody^{My talk} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 23:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)