A Nobody's article contributions

Community ban

Per a community discussion initiated on WP:ANI on May 20, 2010 and closed on May 21, 2010, you have been banned from editing Wikipedia by a consensus decision of the Wikipedia community. The temporary location of the ban discussion is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Time for community ban of A Nobody?; I will append a permanent link when the discussion is archived.

I will be changing the block note to note the community ban is in effect.

Community consensus is that your ongoing repeated sockpuppetry was disruptive to the community as a whole and violated the trust of the community.

If you in the future would like to appeal the ban, you may do so by contacting uninvolved administrators to initiate a new community discussion, or you can appeal to the Arbitration Committee. As a return to editing would necessarily require resolving the Arbcom case which they have on hiatus due to your non-participation there, I believe that's necessary in any case, but that's between you and Arbcom.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive615#Time for community ban of A Nobody? --Chaser (talk) 05:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Billy Rosewood for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Rosewood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Rosewood (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wow

I had no idea you'd been blocked, but I just wanted to thank you for leaving me a bunch of messages in my talk page back in the day. I was away for two years and going over my talk page archives I noticed your kind barnstars and thanksgiving messages and whatnot. I do really appreciate them. Better late than never :) Hope you are well. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

MMA Event Notability

  You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA#MMA_Event_Notability. Kevlar (talk) 18:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Box of tigers milk bars.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Box of tigers milk bars.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Robotech vehicles for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Robotech vehicles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Robotech vehicles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daniel(talk) 00:19, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Parma Witch Hunt.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parma Witch Hunt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Name

  Nice name
Haha, nice name! AnønʘmøưṨ 02:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

List of Tomb Raider Characters listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Tomb Raider Characters. Since you had some involvement with the List of Tomb Raider Characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/24.101.156.239, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

TTN (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 18#List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jontesta (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply