# Yang–Mills equations

In physics and mathematics, and especially differential geometry and gauge theory, the Yang–Mills equations are a system of partial differential equations for a connection on a vector bundle or principal bundle. The Yang–Mills equations arise in physics as the Euler–Lagrange equations of the Yang–Mills action functional. However, the Yang–Mills equations have independently found significant use within mathematics.

Solutions of the Yang–Mills equations are called Yang–Mills connections or instantons. The moduli space of instantons was used by Simon Donaldson to prove Donaldson's theorem.

## Motivation

### Physics

In their foundational paper on the topic of gauge theories, Robert Mills and Chen Yang developed (essentially independent of the mathematical literature) the theory of principal bundles and connections in order to explain the concept of gauge symmetry and gauge invariance as it applies to physical theories.[1] The gauge theories Yang and Mills discovered, now called Yang–Mills theories, generalised the classical work of James Maxwell on Maxwell's equations, which had been phrased in the language of a ${\displaystyle \operatorname {U} (1)}$  gauge theory by Wolfgang Pauli and others.[2] The novelty of the work of Yang and Mills was to define gauge theories for an arbitrary choice of Lie group ${\displaystyle G}$ , called the structure group (or in physics the gauge group, see Gauge group (mathematics) for more details). This group could be non-Abelian as opposed to the case ${\displaystyle G=\operatorname {U} (1)}$  corresponding to electromagnetism, and the right framework to discuss such objects is the theory of principal bundles.

The essential points of the work of Yang and Mills are as follows. One assumes that the fundamental description of a physical model is through the use of fields, and derives that under a local gauge transformation (change of local trivialisation of principal bundle), these physical fields must transform in precisely the way that a connection ${\displaystyle A}$  (in physics, a gauge field) on a principal bundle transforms. The gauge field strength is the curvature ${\displaystyle F_{A}}$  of the connection, and the energy of the gauge field is given (up to a constant) by the Yang–Mills action functional

${\displaystyle \operatorname {YM} (A)=\int _{X}\|F_{A}\|^{2}\,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}.}$

The principle of least action dictates that the correct equations of motion for this physical theory should be given by the Euler–Lagrange equations of this functional, which are the Yang–Mills equations derived below:

${\displaystyle d_{A}\star F_{A}=0.}$

### Mathematics

In addition to the physical origins of the theory, the Yang–Mills equations are of important geometric interest. There is in general no natural choice of connection on a vector bundle or principal bundle. In the special case where this bundle is the tangent bundle to a Riemannian manifold, there is such a natural choice, the Levi-Civita connection, but in general there is an infinite-dimensional space of possible choices. A Yang–Mills connection gives some kind of natural choice of a connection for a general fibre bundle, as we now describe.

A connection is defined by its local forms ${\displaystyle A_{\alpha }\in \Omega ^{1}(U_{\alpha },\operatorname {ad} (P))}$  for a trivialising open cover ${\displaystyle \{U_{\alpha }\}}$  for the bundle ${\displaystyle P\to X}$ . The first attempt at choosing a canonical connection might be to demand that these forms vanish. However, this is not possible unless the trivialisation is flat, in the sense that the transition functions ${\displaystyle g_{\alpha \beta }:U_{\alpha }\cap U_{\beta }\to G}$  are constant functions. Not every bundle is flat, so this is not possible in general. Instead one might ask that the local connection forms ${\displaystyle A_{\alpha }}$  are themselves constant. On a principal bundle the correct way to phrase this condition is that the curvature ${\displaystyle F_{A}=dA+{\frac {1}{2}}[A,A]}$  vanishes. However, by Chern–Weil theory if the curvature ${\displaystyle F_{A}}$  vanishes (that is to say, ${\displaystyle A}$  is a flat connection), then the underlying principal bundle must have trivial Chern classes, which is a topological obstruction to the existence of flat connections: not every principal bundle can have a flat connection.

The best one can hope for is then to ask that instead of vanishing curvature, the bundle has curvature as small as possible. The Yang–Mills action functional described above is precisely (the square of) the ${\displaystyle L^{2}}$ -norm of the curvature, and its Euler–Lagrange equations describe the critical points of this functional, either the absolute minima or local minima. That is to say, Yang–Mills connections are precisely those that minimize their curvature. In this sense they are the natural choice of connection on a principal or vector bundle over a manifold from a mathematical point of view.

## Definition

Let ${\displaystyle X}$  be a compact, oriented, Riemannian manifold. The Yang–Mills equations can be phrased for a connection on a vector bundle or principal ${\displaystyle G}$ -bundle over ${\displaystyle X}$ , for some compact Lie group ${\displaystyle G}$ . Here the latter convention is presented. Let ${\displaystyle P}$  denote a principal ${\displaystyle G}$ -bundle over ${\displaystyle X}$ . Then a connection on ${\displaystyle P}$  may be specified by a Lie algebra-valued differential form ${\displaystyle A}$  on the total space of the principal bundle. This connection has a curvature form ${\displaystyle F_{A}}$ , which is a two-form on ${\displaystyle X}$  with values in the adjoint bundle ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ad} (P)}$  of ${\displaystyle P}$ . Associated to the connection ${\displaystyle A}$  is an exterior covariant derivative ${\displaystyle d_{A}}$ , defined on the adjoint bundle. Additionally, since ${\displaystyle G}$  is compact, its associated compact Lie algebra admits an invariant inner product under the adjoint representation.

Since ${\displaystyle X}$  is Riemannian, there is an inner product on the cotangent bundle, and combined with the invariant inner product on ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ad} (P)}$  there is an inner product on the bundle ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ad} (P)\otimes \Lambda ^{2}T^{*}X}$  of ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ad} (P)}$ -valued two-forms on ${\displaystyle X}$ . Since ${\displaystyle X}$  is oriented, there is an ${\displaystyle L^{2}}$ -inner product on the sections of this bundle. Namely,

${\displaystyle \langle s,t\rangle _{L^{2}}=\int _{X}\langle s,t\rangle \,dvol_{g}}$

where inside the integral the bundle-wise inner product is being used, and ${\displaystyle dvol_{g}}$  is the Riemannian volume form of ${\displaystyle X}$ . Using this ${\displaystyle L^{2}}$ -inner product, the formal adjoint operator of ${\displaystyle d_{A}}$  is defined by

${\displaystyle \langle d_{A}s,t\rangle _{L^{2}}=\langle s,d_{A}^{*}t\rangle _{L^{2}}}$ .

Explicitly this is given by ${\displaystyle d_{A}^{*}=\pm \star d_{A}\star }$  where ${\displaystyle \star }$  is the Hodge star operator acting on two-forms.

Assuming the above set up, the Yang–Mills equations are a system of (in general non-linear) partial differential equations given by

${\displaystyle d_{A}^{*}F_{A}=0.}$ [3]

(1)

Since the Hodge star is an isomorphism, by the explicit formula for ${\displaystyle d_{A}^{*}}$  the Yang–Mills equations can equivalently be written

${\displaystyle d_{A}\star F_{A}=0.}$

(2)

A connection satisfying (1) or (2) is called a Yang–Mills connection.

Every connection automatically satisfies the Bianchi identity ${\displaystyle d_{A}F_{A}=0}$ , so Yang–Mills connections can be seen as a non-linear analogue of harmonic differential forms, which satisfy

${\displaystyle d\omega =d^{*}\omega =0}$ .

In this sense the search for Yang–Mills connections can be compared to Hodge theory, which seeks a harmonic representative in the de Rham cohomology class of a differential form. The analogy being that a Yang–Mills connection is like a harmonic representative in the set of all possible connections on a principal bundle.

## Derivation

The Yang–Mills equations are the Euler–Lagrange equations of the Yang–Mills functional, defined by

${\displaystyle \operatorname {YM} (A)=\int _{X}\|F_{A}\|^{2}\,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}.}$

(3)

To derive the equations from the functional, recall that the space ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}}$  of all connections on ${\displaystyle P}$  is an affine space modelled on the vector space ${\displaystyle \Omega ^{1}(P;{\mathfrak {g}})}$ . Given a small deformation ${\displaystyle A+ta}$  of a connection ${\displaystyle A}$  in this affine space, the curvatures are related by

${\displaystyle F_{A+ta}=F_{A}+td_{A}a+t^{2}a\wedge a.}$

To determine the critical points of (3), compute

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {d}{dt}}\left(\operatorname {YM} (A+ta)\right)_{t=0}&={\frac {d}{dt}}\left(\int _{X}\langle F_{A}+t\,d_{A}a+t^{2}a\wedge a,F_{A}+t\,d_{A}a+t^{2}a\wedge a\rangle \,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}\right)_{t=0}\\&={\frac {d}{dt}}\left(\int _{X}\|F_{A}\|^{2}+2t\langle F_{A},d_{A}a\rangle +2t^{2}\langle F_{A},a\wedge a\rangle +t^{4}\|a\wedge a\|^{2}\,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}\right)_{t=0}\\&=2\int _{X}\langle d_{A}^{*}F_{A},a\rangle \,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}.\end{aligned}}}

The connection ${\displaystyle A}$  is a critical point of the Yang–Mills functional if and only if this vanishes for every ${\displaystyle a}$ , and this occurs precisely when (1) is satisfied.

## Moduli space of Yang–Mills connections

The Yang–Mills equations are gauge invariant. Mathematically, a gauge transformation is an automorphism ${\displaystyle g}$  of the principal bundle ${\displaystyle P}$ , and since the inner product on ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ad} (P)}$  is invariant, the Yang–Mills functional satisfies

${\displaystyle \operatorname {YM} (g\cdot A)=\int _{X}\|gF_{A}g^{-1}\|^{2}\,dvol_{g}=\int _{X}\|F_{A}\|^{2}\,d\mathrm {vol} _{g}=\operatorname {YM} (A)}$

and so if ${\displaystyle A}$  satisfies (1), so does ${\displaystyle g\cdot A}$ .

There is a moduli space of Yang–Mills connections modulo gauge transformations. Denote by ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {G}}}$  the gauge group of automorphisms of ${\displaystyle P}$ . The set ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}={\mathcal {A}}/{\mathcal {G}}}$  classifies all connections modulo gauge transformations, and the moduli space ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}$  of Yang–Mills connections is a subset. In general neither ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}}$  or ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}$  is Hausdorff or a smooth manifold. However, by restricting to irreducible connections, that is, connections ${\displaystyle A}$  whose holonomy group is given by all of ${\displaystyle G}$ , one does obtain Hausdorff spaces. The space of irreducible connections is denoted ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}^{*}}$ , and so the moduli spaces are denoted ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}^{*}}$  and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}^{*}}$ .

Moduli spaces of Yang–Mills connections have been intensively studied in specific circumstances. Michael Atiyah and Raoul Bott studied the Yang–Mills equations for bundles over compact Riemann surfaces.[4] There the moduli space obtains an alternative description as a moduli space of holomorphic vector bundles. This is the Narasimhan–Seshadri theorem, which was proved in this form relating Yang–Mills connections to holomorphic vector bundles by Donaldson.[5] In this setting the moduli space has the structure of a compact Kähler manifold. Moduli of Yang–Mills connections have been most studied when the dimension of the base manifold ${\displaystyle X}$  is four.[3][6] Here the Yang–Mills equations admit a simplification from a second-order PDE to a first-order PDE, the anti-self-duality equations.

## Anti-self-duality equations

When the dimension of the base manifold ${\displaystyle X}$  is four, a coincidence occurs. The Hodge star operator takes differential ${\displaystyle p}$ -forms to differential ${\displaystyle (n-p)}$ -forms, where ${\displaystyle \dim X=n}$ . Thus, in dimension four, the Hodge star operator maps two-forms to two-forms,

${\displaystyle \star :\Omega ^{2}(X)\to \Omega ^{2}(X)}$ .

The Hodge star operator squares to the identity in this case, and so has eigenvalues ${\displaystyle 1}$  and ${\displaystyle -1}$ . In particular there is a decomposition

${\displaystyle \Omega ^{2}(X)=\Omega _{+}(X)\oplus \Omega _{-}(X)}$

into the positive and negative eigenspaces of ${\displaystyle \star }$ , the self-dual and anti-self-dual two-forms. If a connection ${\displaystyle A}$  on a principal ${\displaystyle G}$ -bundle over a four-manifold ${\displaystyle X}$  satisfies either ${\displaystyle F_{A}={\star F_{A}}}$  or ${\displaystyle F_{A}=-{\star F_{A}}}$ , then by (2), the connection is a Yang–Mills connection. These connections are called either self-dual connections or anti-self-dual connections, and the equations the self-duality (SD) equations and the anti-self-duality (ASD) equations.[3] The spaces of self-dual and anti-self-dual connections are denoted by ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}^{+}}$  and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {A}}^{-}}$ , and similarly for ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}^{\pm }}$  and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}^{\pm }}$ .

The moduli space of ASD connections, or instantons, was most intensively studied by Donaldson in the case where ${\displaystyle G=\operatorname {SU} (2)}$  and ${\displaystyle X}$  is simply-connected.[7][8][9] In this setting, the principal ${\displaystyle \operatorname {SU} (2)}$ -bundle is classified by its second Chern class, ${\displaystyle c_{2}(P)\in H^{4}(X,\mathbb {Z} )\cong \mathbb {Z} }$ .[Note 1] For various choices of principal bundle, one obtains moduli spaces with interesting properties. These spaces are Hausdorff, even when allowing reducible connections, and are generically smooth. It was shown by Donaldson that the smooth part is orientable. By the Atiyah–Singer index theorem, one may compute that the dimension of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}_{k}^{-}}$ , the moduli space of ASD connections when ${\displaystyle c_{2}(P)=k}$ , to be

${\displaystyle \dim {\mathcal {M}}_{k}^{-}=8k-3(1-b_{1}(X)+b_{+}(X))}$

where ${\displaystyle b_{1}(X)}$  is the first Betti number of ${\displaystyle X}$ , and ${\displaystyle b_{+}(X)}$  is the dimension of the positive-definite subspace of ${\displaystyle H_{2}(X,\mathbb {R} )}$  with respect to the intersection form on ${\displaystyle X}$ .[3] For example, when ${\displaystyle X=S^{4}}$  and ${\displaystyle k=1}$ , the intersection form is trivial and the moduli space has dimension ${\displaystyle \dim {\mathcal {M}}_{1}^{-}(S^{4})=8-3=5}$ . This agrees with existence of the BPST instanton, which is the unique ASD instanton on ${\displaystyle S^{4}}$  up to a 5 parameter family defining its centre in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$  and its scale. Such instantons on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$  may be extended across the point at infinity using Uhlenbeck's removable singularity theorem.

## Applications

### Donaldson's theorem

The moduli space of Yang–Mills equations was used by Donaldson to prove Donaldson's theorem about the intersection form of simply-connected four-manifolds. Using analytical results of Clifford Taubes and Karen Uhlenbeck, Donaldson was able to show that in specific circumstances (when the intersection form is definite) the moduli space of ASD instantons on a smooth, compact, oriented, simply-connected four-manifold ${\displaystyle X}$  gives a cobordism between a copy of the manifold itself, and a disjoint union of copies of the complex projective plane ${\displaystyle \mathbb {CP} ^{2}}$ .[7][10][11][12] The intersection form is a cobordism invariant up to isomorphism, showing that any such smooth manifold has diagonalisable intersection form.

The moduli space of ASD instantons may be used to define further invariants of four-manifolds. Donaldson defined rational numbers associated to a four-manifold arising from pairings of cohomology classes on the moduli space.[9] This work has subsequently been surpassed by Seiberg–Witten invariants.

### Dimensional reduction and other moduli spaces

Through the process of dimensional reduction, the Yang–Mills equations may be used to derive other important equations in differential geometry and gauge theory. Dimensional reduction is the process of taking the Yang–Mills equations over a four-manifold, typically ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$ , and imposing that the solutions be invariant under a symmetry group. For example:

• By requiring the anti-self-duality equations to be invariant under translations in a single direction of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$ , one obtains the Bogomolny equations which describe magnetic monopoles on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}}$ .
• By requiring the self-duality equations to be invariant under translation in two directions, one obtains Hitchin's equations first investigated by Hitchin. These equations naturally lead to the study of Higgs bundles and the Hitchin system.
• By requiring the anti-self-duality equations to be invariant in three directions, one obtains the Nahm equations on an interval.

There is a duality between solutions of the dimensionally reduced ASD equations on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}}$  and ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$  called the Nahm transform, after Werner Nahm, who first described how to construct monopoles from Nahm equation data.[13] Hitchin showed the converse, and Donaldson proved that solutions to the Nahm equations could further be linked to moduli spaces of rational maps from the complex projective line to itself.[14][15]

The duality observed for these solutions is theorized to hold for arbitrary dual groups of symmetries of a four-manifold. Indeed there is a similar duality between instantons invariant under dual lattices inside ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$ , instantons on dual four-dimensional tori, and the ADHM construction can be thought of as a duality between instantons on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{4}}$  and dual algebraic data over a single point.[3]

### Chern–Simons theory

The moduli space of Yang–Mills equations over a compact Riemann surface ${\displaystyle \Sigma }$  can be viewed as the configuration space of Chern–Simons theory on a cylinder ${\displaystyle \Sigma \times [0,1]}$ . In this case the moduli space admits a geometric quantization, discovered independently by Nigel Hitchin and Axelrod–Della Pietra–Witten.[16][17]

## Notes

1. ^ For a proof of this fact, see the post https://mathoverflow.net/a/265399.

## References

1. ^ Yang, C.N. and Mills, R.L., 1954. Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance. Physical review, 96(1), p.191.
2. ^ Pauli, W., 1941. Relativistic field theories of elementary particles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 13(3), p.203.
3. Donaldson, S. K., & Kronheimer, P. B. (1990). The geometry of four-manifolds. Oxford University Press.
4. ^ Atiyah, M. F., & Bott, R. (1983). The Yang–Mills equations over riemann surfaces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 308(1505), 523–615.
5. ^ Donaldson, S. K. (1983). A new proof of a theorem of Narasimhan and Seshadri. Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(2), 269–277.
6. ^ Friedman, R., & Morgan, J. W. (1998). Gauge theory and the topology of four-manifolds (Vol. 4). American Mathematical Soc..
7. ^ a b Donaldson, S. K. (1983). An application of gauge theory to four-dimensional topology. Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(2), 279–315.
8. ^ Donaldson, S. K. (1986). Connections, cohomology and the intersection forms of 4-manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 24(3), 275–341.
9. ^ a b Donaldson, S. K. (1990). Polynomial invariants for smooth four-manifolds. Topology, 29(3), 257–315.
10. ^ Taubes, C. H. (1982). Self-dual Yang–Mills connections on non-self-dual 4-manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 17(1), 139–170.
11. ^ Uhlenbeck, K. K. (1982). Connections with Lp bounds on curvature. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 83(1), 31–42.
12. ^ Uhlenbeck, K. K. (1982). Removable singularities in Yang–Mills fields. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 83(1), 11–29.
13. ^ Nahm, W. (1983). All self-dual multimonopoles for arbitrary gauge groups. In Structural elements in particle physics and statistical mechanics (pp. 301–310). Springer, Boston, MA.
14. ^ Hitchin, N. J. (1983). On the construction of monopoles. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 89(2), 145–190.
15. ^ Donaldson, S. K. (1984). Nahm's equations and the classification of monopoles. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 96(3), 387–408.
16. ^ Hitchin, N. J. (1990). Flat connections and geometric quantization. Communications in mathematical physics, 131(2), 347–380.
17. ^ Axelrod, S., Della Pietra, S., & Witten, E. (1991). Geometric quantization of Chern Simons gauge theory. representations, 34, 39.