This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (September 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The Chern–Simons theory, named after Shiing-Shen Chern and James Harris Simons, is a 3-dimensional topological quantum field theory of Schwarz type developed by Edward Witten. It is so named because its action is proportional to the integral of the Chern–Simons 3-form.
In condensed-matter physics, Chern–Simons theory describes the topological order in fractional quantum Hall effect states. In mathematics, it has been used to calculate knot invariants and three-manifold invariants such as the Jones polynomial.
Particularly, Chern–Simons theory is specified by a choice of simple Lie group G known as the gauge group of the theory and also a number referred to as the level of the theory, which is a constant that multiplies the action. The action is gauge dependent, however the partition function of the quantum theory is well-defined when the level is an integer and the gauge field strength vanishes on all boundaries of the 3-dimensional spacetime.
The classical theoryEdit
In the 1940s S. S. Chern and A. Weil studied the global curvature properties of smooth manifolds M as de Rham cohomology (Chern–Weil theory), which is an important step in the theory of characteristic classes in differential geometry. Given a flat G-principal bundle P on M there exists a unique homomorphism, called the Chern–Weil homomorphism, from the algebra of G-adjoint invariant polynomials on g (Lie algebra of G) to the cohomology . If the invariant polynomial is homogeneous one can write down concretely any k-form of the closed connection ω as some 2k-form of the associated curvature form Ω of ω.
In 1974 S. S. Chern and J. H. Simons had concretely constructed a (2k − 1)-form df(ω) such that
where T is the Chern–Weil homomorphism. This form is called Chern–Simons form. If df(ω) is closed one can integrate the above formula
where C is a (2k − 1)-dimensional cycle on M. This invariant is called Chern–Simons invariant. As pointed out in the introduction of the Chern–Simons paper, the Chern–Simons invariant CS(M) is the boundary term that cannot be determined by any pure combinatorial formulation. It also can be defined as
where is the first Pontryagin number and s(M) is the section of the normal orthogonal bundle P. Moreover, the Chern–Simons term is described as the eta invariant defined by Atiyah, Patodi and Singer.
The gauge invariance and the metric invariance can be viewed as the invariance under the adjoint Lie group action in the Chern–Weil theory. The action integral (path integral) of the field theory in physics is viewed as the Lagrangian integral of the Chern–Simons form and Wilson loop, holonomy of vector bundle on M. These explain why the Chern–Simons theory is closely related to topological field theory.
Chern–Simons theory is a gauge theory, which means that a classical configuration in the Chern–Simons theory on M with gauge group G is described by a principal G-bundle on M. The connection of this bundle is characterized by a connection one-form A which is valued in the Lie algebra g of the Lie group G. In general the connection A is only defined on individual coordinate patches, and the values of A on different patches are related by maps known as gauge transformations. These are characterized by the assertion that the covariant derivative, which is the sum of the exterior derivative operator d and the connection A, transforms in the adjoint representation of the gauge group G. The square of the covariant derivative with itself can be interpreted as a g-valued 2-form F called the curvature form or field strength. It also transforms in the adjoint representation.
The constant k is called the level of the theory. The classical physics of Chern–Simons theory is independent of the choice of level k.
Classically the system is characterized by its equations of motion which are the extrema of the action with respect to variations of the field A. In terms of the field curvature
the field equation is explicitly
The classical equations of motion are therefore satisfied if and only if the curvature vanishes everywhere, in which case the connection is said to be flat. Thus the classical solutions to G Chern–Simons theory are the flat connections of principal G-bundles on M. Flat connections are determined entirely by holonomies around noncontractible cycles on the base M. More precisely, they are in one-to-one correspondence with equivalence classes of homomorphisms from the fundamental group of M to the gauge group G up to conjugation.
If M has a boundary N then there is additional data which describes a choice of trivialization of the principal G-bundle on N. Such a choice characterizes a map from N to G. The dynamics of this map is described by the Wess–Zumino–Witten (WZW) model on N at level k.
To canonically quantize Chern–Simons theory one defines a state on each 2-dimensional surface Σ in M. As in any quantum field theory, the states correspond to rays in a Hilbert space. There is no preferred notion of time in a Schwarz-type topological field theory and so one can require that Σ be a Cauchy surface, in fact, a state can be defined on any surface.
Σ is of codimension one, and so one may cut M along Σ. After such a cutting M will be a manifold with boundary and in particular classically the dynamics of Σ will be described by a WZW model. Witten has shown that this correspondence holds even quantum mechanically. More precisely, he demonstrated that the Hilbert space of states is always finite-dimensional and can be canonically identified with the space of conformal blocks of the G WZW model at level k.
For example, when Σ is a 2-sphere, this Hilbert space is one-dimensional and so there is only one state. When Σ is a 2-torus the states correspond to the integrable representations of the affine Lie algebra corresponding to g at level k. Characterizations of the conformal blocks at higher genera are not necessary for Witten's solution of Chern–Simons theory.
The observables of Chern–Simons theory are the n-point correlation functions of gauge-invariant operators. The most often studied class of gauge invariant operators are Wilson loops. A Wilson loop is the holonomy around a loop in M, traced in a given representation R of G. As we will be interested in products of Wilson loops, without loss of generality we may restrict our attention to irreducible representations R.
More concretely, given an irreducible representation R and a loop K in M, one may define the Wilson loop by
HOMFLY and Jones polynomialsEdit
Consider a link L in M, which is a collection of ℓ disjoint loops. A particularly interesting observable is the ℓ-point correlation function formed from the product of the Wilson loops around each disjoint loop, each traced in the fundamental representation of G. One may form a normalized correlation function by dividing this observable by the partition function Z(M), which is just the 0-point correlation function.
In the special case in which M is the 3-sphere, Witten has shown that these normalized correlation functions are proportional to known knot polynomials. For example, in G = U(N) Chern–Simons theory at level k the normalized correlation function is, up to a phase, equal to
The phase ambiguity reflects the fact that, as Witten has shown, the quantum correlation functions are not fully defined by the classical data. The linking number of a loop with itself enters into the calculation of the partition function, but this number is not invariant under small deformations and in particular, is not a topological invariant. This number can be rendered well defined if one chooses a framing for each loop, which is a choice of preferred nonzero normal vector at each point along which one deforms the loop to calculate its self-linking number. This procedure is an example of the point-splitting regularization procedure introduced by Paul Dirac and Rudolf Peierls to define apparently divergent quantities in quantum field theory in 1934.
Sir Michael Atiyah has shown that there exists a canonical choice of 2-framing, which is generally used in the literature today and leads to a well-defined linking number. With the canonical framing the above phase is the exponential of 2πi/(k + N) times the linking number of L with itself.
- Problem（Extension of Jones polynomial to general 3-manifolds）
``The original Jones polynomial was defined for 1-links in the 3-sphere (the 3-ball, the 3-space R3). Can you define the Jones polynomial for 1-links in any 3-manifold?’’
See section 1.1 of this paper  for the background and the history of this problem. Kauffman submitted a solution in the case of the product manifold of closed oriented surface and the closed interval, by introducing virtual 1-knots . It is open in the other cases. Witten’s path integral for Jones polynomial is written for links in any compact 3-manifold formally, but the calculus is not done even in physics level in any case other than the 3-sphere (the 3-ball, the 3-space R3). This problem is also open in physics level. In the case of Alexander polynomial, this problem is solved.
Relationships with other theoriesEdit
Topological string theoriesEdit
In the context of string theory, a U(N) Chern–Simons theory on an oriented Lagrangian 3-submanifold M of a 6-manifold X arises as the string field theory of open strings ending on a D-brane wrapping X in the A-model topological string theory on X. The B-model topological open string field theory on the spacefilling worldvolume of a stack of D5-branes is a 6-dimensional variant of Chern–Simons theory known as holomorphic Chern–Simons theory.
WZW and matrix modelsEdit
Chern–Simons theories are related to many other field theories. For example, if one considers a Chern–Simons theory with gauge group G on a manifold with boundary then all of the 3-dimensional propagating degrees of freedom may be gauged away, leaving a two-dimensional conformal field theory known as a G Wess–Zumino–Witten model on the boundary. In addition the U(N) and SO(N) Chern–Simons theories at large N are well approximated by matrix models.
Chern–Simons gravity theoryEdit
In 1982, S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton proposed the Chern–Simons gravity theory in three dimensions, in which the Einstein–Hilbert action in gravity theory is modified by adding the Chern–Simons term.Deser, Jackiw & Templeton (1982)
In 2003, R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi extended this theory to four dimensions Jackiw & Pi (2003) and Chern–Simons gravity theory has some considerable effects not only to fundamental physics but also condensed matter theory and astronomy.
The four-dimensional case is very analogous to the three-dimensional case. In three dimensions, the gravitational Chern–Simons term is
This variation gives the Cotton tensor
Then, Chern–Simons modification of three-dimensional gravity is made by adding the above Cotton tensor to the field equation, which can be obtained as the vacuum solution by varying the Einstein–Hilbert action.
See also (2+1)–dimensional topological gravity.
Chern–Simons matter theoriesEdit
In 2013 Kenneth A. Intriligator and Nathan Seiberg solved these 3d Chern–Simons gauge theories and their phases using monopoles carrying extra degrees of freedom. The Witten index of the many vacua discovered was computed by compactifying the space by turning on mass parameters and then computing the index. In some vacua, supersymmetry was computed to be broken. These monopoles were related to condensed matter vortices. (Intriligator & Seiberg (2013))
The N = 6 Chern–Simons matter theory is the holographic dual of M-theory on .
Chern–Simons terms in other theoriesEdit
The Chern–Simons term can also be added to models which aren't topological quantum field theories. In 3D, this gives rise to a massive photon if this term is added to the action of Maxwell's theory of electrodynamics. This term can be induced by integrating over a massive charged Dirac field. It also appears for example in the quantum Hall effect. Ten- and eleven-dimensional generalizations of Chern–Simons terms appear in the actions of all ten- and eleven-dimensional supergravity theories.
One-loop renormalization of the levelEdit
If one adds matter to a Chern–Simons gauge theory then, in general it is no longer topological. However, if one adds n Majorana fermions then, due to the parity anomaly, when integrated out they lead to a pure Chern–Simons theory with a one-loop renormalization of the Chern–Simons level by −n/2, in other words the level k theory with n fermions is equivalent to the level k − n/2 theory without fermions.
- Chern, S.-S. & Simons, J. (1974). "Characteristic forms and geometric invariants". Annals of Mathematics. 99 (1): 48–69. doi:10.2307/1971013.
- Deser, Stanley; Jackiw, Roman; Templeton, S. (1982). "Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 48: 975–978. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48..975D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.975.
- Intriligator, Kenneth; Seiberg, Nathan (2013). "Aspects of 3d N = 2 Chern–Simons-Matter Theories". Journal of High Energy Physics. arXiv:1305.1633. Bibcode:2013JHEP...07..079I. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)079.
- Jackiw, Roman; Pi, S.-Y (2003). "Chern–Simons modification of general relativity". Physical Review D. 68: 104012. arXiv:gr-qc/0308071. Bibcode:2003PhRvD..68j4012J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.104012.
- Kulshreshtha, Usha; Kulshreshtha, D.S.; Mueller-Kirsten, H. J. W.; Vary, J. P. (2009). "Hamiltonian, path integral and BRST formulations of the Chern-Simons-Higgs theory under appropriate gauge fixing". Physica Scripta . 79: 045001. Bibcode:2009PhyS...79d5001K. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/79/04/045001.
- Kulshreshtha, Usha; Kulshreshtha, D.S.; Vary, J. P. (2010). "Light-front Hamiltonian, path integral and BRST formulations of the Chern-Simons-Higgs theory under appropriate gauge fixing". Physica Scripta. 82: 055101. Bibcode:2010PhyS...82e5101K. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/82/05/055101.
- Lopez, Ana; Fradkin, Eduardo (1991). "Fractional quantum Hall effect and Chern-Simons gauge theories". Physical Review B. 44: 5246. Bibcode:1991PhRvB..44.5246L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.5246.
- Marino, Marcos (2005). "Chern–Simons Theory and Topological Strings". Reviews of Modern Physics. 77 (2): 675–720. arXiv:hep-th/0406005. Bibcode:2005RvMP...77..675M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.675.
- Marino, Marcos (2005). Chern–Simons Theory, Matrix Models, And Topological Strings. International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford University Press.
- Witten, Edward (1988). "Topological Quantum Field Theory". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 117: 353. Bibcode:1988CMaPh.117..353W. doi:10.1007/BF01223371.
- Witten, Edward (1989). "Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial". Communications in Mathematical Physics. 121 (3): 351–399. Bibcode:1989CMaPh.121..351W. doi:10.1007/BF01217730. MR 0990772.
- Witten, Edward (1995). "Chern–Simons Theory as a String Theory". Progress in Mathematics. 133: 637–678. arXiv:hep-th/9207094. Bibcode:1992hep.th....7094W.
- Kauffman, L.H; Ogasa, E; Shcneider, J (2018), A spinning construction for virtual 1-knots and 2-knots, and the fiberwise and welded equivalence of virtual 1-knots, arXiv:1808.03023
- Kauffman, L.E., Talks at MSRI Meeting in January 1997, AMS Meeting at University of Maryland, College Park in March 1997, Isaac Newton Institute Lecture in November 1997, Knots in Hellas Meeting in Delphi, Greece in July 1998, APCTP-NANKAI Symposium on Yang-Baxter Systems, Non-Linear Models and Applications at Seoul, Korea in October 1998, Virtual knot theory, European J. Combin. 20 (1999) 663–690, arXiv:math/9811028