Open main menu

Gauge covariant derivative

The gauge covariant derivative is a variation of the covariant derivative used in general relativity. If a theory has gauge transformations, it means that some physical properties of certain equations are preserved under those transformations. Likewise, the gauge covariant derivative is the ordinary derivative modified in such a way as to make it behave like a true vector operator, so that equations written using the covariant derivative preserve their physical properties under gauge transformations.

OverviewEdit

There are many ways in which to understand the gauge covariant derivative. The approach taken in this article is based on the historically traditional notation used in many physics textbooks.[1][2][3] Another approach is to understand the gauge covariant derivative as a kind of connection, and more specifically, an affine connection.[4][5][6] The affine connection is interesting because it does not require any concept of a metric tensor to be defined; the curvature of an affine connection can be understood as the field strength of the gauge potential. When a metric is available, then one can go in a different direction, and define a connection on a frame bundle. This path leads directly to general relativity; however, it requires a metric, which particle physics gauge theories do not have.

Rather than being generalizations of one-another, affine and metric geometry go off in different directions: the gauge group of (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry must be the indefinite orthogonal group O(s,r) in general, or the Lorentz group O(3,1) for space-time. This is because the fibers of the frame bundle must necessarily, by definition, connect the tangent and cotangent spaces of space-time.[7] By contrast, the gauge groups employed in particle physics could be (in principle) any Lie group at all (and, in practice, being only U(1), SU(2) or SU(3) in the Standard Model). Note that Lie groups do not come equipped with a metric.

A yet more complicated, yet more accurate and geometrically enlightening, approach is to understand that the gauge covariant derivative is (exactly) the same thing as the exterior covariant derivative on a section of an associated bundle for the principal fiber bundle of the gauge theory;[8] and, for the case of spinors, the associated bundle would be a spin bundle of the spin structure.[9] Although conceptually the same, this approach uses a very different set of notation, and requires a far more advanced background in multiple areas of differential geometry.

The final step in the geometrization of gauge invariance is to recognize that, in quantum theory, one needs only to compare neighboring fibers of the principal fiber bundle, and that the fibers themselves provide a superfluous extra description. This leads to the idea of modding out the gauge group to obtain the gauge groupoid as the closest description of the gauge connection in quantum field theory.[6][10]

For ordinary Lie algebras, the gauge covariant derivative on the space symmetries (those of the pseudo-Riemannian manifold and general relativity) cannot be intertwined with the internal gauge symmetries; that is, metric geometry and affine geometry are necessarily distinct mathematical subjects: this is the content of the Coleman–Mandula theorem. However, a premise of this theorem is violated by the Lie superalgebras (which are not Lie algebras!) thus offering hope that a single unified symmetry can describe both spatial and internal symmetries: this is the foundation of supersymmetry.

The more mathematical approach uses an index-free notation, emphasizing the geometric and algebraic structure of the gauge theory and its relationship to Lie algebras and Riemannian manifolds; for example, treating gauge covariance as equivariance on fibers of a fiber bundle. The index notation used in physics makes it far more convenient for practical calculations, although it makes the overall geometric structure of the theory more opaque.[7] The physics approach also has a pedagogical advantage: the general structure of a gauge theory can be exposed after a minimal background in multivariate calculus, whereas the geometric approach requires a large investment of time in the general theory of differential geometry, Riemannian manifolds, Lie algebras, representations of Lie algebras and principle bundles before a general understanding can be developed. In more advanced discussions, both notations are commonly intermixed.

This article attempts to hew most closely to the notation and language commonly employed in physics curriculum, touching only briefly on the more abstract connections.

Fluid dynamicsEdit

In fluid dynamics, the gauge covariant derivative of a fluid may be defined as

 

where   is a velocity vector field of a fluid.

Gauge theoryEdit

In gauge theory, which studies a particular class of fields which are of importance in quantum field theory, the minimally-coupled gauge covariant derivative is defined as

 

where   is the electromagnetic four potential.

(This is valid for a Minkowski metric signature (−, +, +, +), which is common in general relativity and used below. For the particle physics convention (+, −, −, −), it is  . The electron's charge is defined negative as  , while the Dirac field is defined to transform positively as  )

Construction of the covariant derivative through the comparatorEdit

Construction of the covariant derivative through gauge covariance requirementEdit

Consider a generic (possibly non-Abelian) Gauge transformation, defined by a symmetry operator  , acting on a field  , such that

 
 

where   is an element of the Lie algebra associated with the Lie group of symmetry transformations, and can be expressed in terms of the generators of the group,  , as  .

The partial derivative   transforms, accordingly, as

 

and a kinetic term of the form   is thus not invariant under this transformation.

We can introduce the covariant derivative   in this context as a generalization of the partial derivative   which transforms covariantly under the Gauge transformation, i.e. an object satisfying

 

which in operatorial form takes the form

 

We thus compute (omitting the explicit   dependencies for brevity)

 ,

where

 .

The requirement for   to transform covariantly is now translated in the condition

 

To obtain an explicit expression, we follow QED and make the Ansatz

 

where the vector field   satisfies,

 

from which it follows that

 

and

 

which, using  , takes the form

 

We have thus found an object   such that

 

Quantum electrodynamicsEdit

If a gauge transformation is given by

 

and for the gauge potential

 

then   transforms as

 ,

and   transforms as

 

and   transforms as

 

so that

 

and   in the QED Lagrangian is therefore gauge invariant, and the gauge covariant derivative is thus named aptly.

On the other hand, the non-covariant derivative   would not preserve the Lagrangian's gauge symmetry, since

 .

Quantum chromodynamicsEdit

In quantum chromodynamics, the gauge covariant derivative is[11]

 

where   is the coupling constant,   is the gluon gauge field, for eight different gluons  ,   is a four-component Dirac spinor, and where   is one of the eight Gell-Mann matrices,  . The Gell-Mann matricies give a representation of the color symmetry group SU(3). For quarks, the representation is the fundamental representation, for gluons, the representation is the adjoint representation.

Standard ModelEdit

The covariant derivative in the Standard Model can be expressed in the following form:[12]

 

The gauge fields here belong to the fundamental representations of the electroweak Lie group   times the color symmetry Lie group SU(3).

General relativityEdit

In general relativity, the gauge covariant derivative is defined as

 

where   is the Christoffel symbol. More formally, this derivative can be understood as the Riemannian connection on a frame bundle. The "gauge freedom" here is the arbitrary choice of a coordinate frame at each point in space-time.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ L.D. Faddeev, A.A. Slavnov, Gauge Fields: Introduction to Gauge Theory, (1980) Benjamin Cummings, ISBN 0-8053-9016-2
  2. ^ Claude Itzykson, Jean-Bernard Zuber, Quantum Field Theory (1980) McGraw-Hill ISBN 0-07-032071-3
  3. ^ Warren Siegel, Fields (1999) ArXiv
  4. ^ Richard S. Palais, The Geometrization of Physics (1981) Lecture Notes, Institute of Mathematics, National Tsing Hua University
  5. ^ M. E. Mayer, "Review: David D. Bleecker, Gauge theory and variational principles", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 9 (1983), no. 1, 83--92
  6. ^ a b Alexandre Guay, Geometrical aspects of local gauge symmetry (2004)
  7. ^ a b Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler, Gravitation, (1973) W. H. Freeman and Company
  8. ^ David Bleecker, "Gauge Theory and Variational Principles" (1982) D. Reidel Publishing (See chapter 3)
  9. ^ David Bleecker, op. cit. (See Chapter 6.)
  10. ^ Meinhard E. Mayer, "Principal Bundles versus Lie Groupoids in Gauge Theory", (1990) in Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Volume 245 pp 793-802
  11. ^ http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~dobaczew/maub-42w/node9.html
  12. ^ See e.g. eq. 3.116 in C. Tully, Elementary Particle Physics in a Nutshell, 2011, Princeton University Press.