Open main menu

William of Rubruck

Voyage of William of Rubruck in 1253–1255.

William of Rubruck (Dutch: Willem van Rubroeck; Latin: Gulielmus de Rubruquis; fl. 1253 – 1255) was a Flemish Franciscan missionary and explorer. His account of his travels is one of the masterpieces of medieval geographical literature, comparable to those of Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta. Born in Rubrouck, Flanders,[1] he is known also as William of Rubruk, Willem van Ruysbroeck, Guillaume de Rubrouck or Willielmus de Rubruquis. He travelled to various places of the Mongol Empire in Asia before his return to Europe.

MissionEdit

William accompanied King Louis IX of France on the Seventh Crusade in 1248. On May 7, 1253, on Louis' orders, he set out on a missionary journey to convert the Tatars to Christianity.[2] He first stopped in Constantinople to confer with Baldwin of Hainaut, who had recently returned from a trip to Karakorum, the capital of the Mongol Empire, on behalf of Baldwin II, Latin Emperor. William then followed the route of the first journey of the Hungarian Friar Julian, and in Asia that of the Italian Friar Giovanni da Pian del Carpine. With William's party were Bartolomeo da Cremona, an attendant called Gosset, and an interpreter named in William's report Homo Dei, meaning "man of God", perhaps representing the Arabic Abdullah, "servant of God."

TravelsEdit

After reaching the Crimean town of Sudak, William continued his trek with oxen and carts. Nine days after crossing the Don he met Sartaq Khan, ruler of the Kipchak Khanate. The Khan sent William on to his father, Batu Khan, at Sarai near the Volga. Five weeks later, after the departure from Sudak, he reached the encampment of Batu Khan, Mongol ruler of the Volga River region. Batu refused conversion but sent the ambassadors on to the Great Khan of the Mongols, Möngke Khan. He and his travelling companions set off on horseback on September 16, 1253 on a 9,000 km journey to the court of the Great Khan at Karakorum. Upon arrival they were received courteously, and he was given an audience on January 4, 1254.[3] William's account provided an extensive description of the city's walls, markets and temples, and the separate quarters for Muslim and Chinese craftsmen among a surprisingly cosmopolitan population. He also visited the court of the Vastacius (Empire of Nicaea) during the feast day of Felicitas and met Nicaean envoys during his travels, and among Europeans he encountered were the nephew of an English bishop, a woman from Lorraine who cooked William's Easter dinner, and a French silversmith who was making ornaments for the Khan's women and altars for the Nestorian Christians.[4] Guillaume Bouchier was the Frenchman.[5] He stayed at the Khan's camp until July 10, 1254, when they began their long journey back home. William and his companions reached the Crusader State of Tripoli on August 15, 1255. William of Rubruck's was the fourth European mission to the Mongols: previous ones were led by Giovanni da Pian del Carpine and Ascelin of Lombardia in 1245 and André de Longjumeau in 1249. The King was encouraged to send another mission by reports of the presence of Nestorian Christians at the Mongolian court.

AccountEdit

 
An initial from a 14th century copy of the manuscript. The upper portion shows William of Rubruck and his travelling companion receiving a commission from Louis IX of France. The lower portion shows the two friars on their journey.[6][7]

On his return, William presented to King Louis IX a very clear and precise report, entitled Itinerarium fratris Willielmi de Rubruquis de ordine fratrum Minorum, Galli, Anno gratiae 1253 ad partes Orientales.

In this report, he described the peculiarities of Mongolia as well as many geographical observations. There were also anthropological observations, such as his surprise at the presence of Islam in Inner Asia.[8] William was critical of the Hellenic traditions he encountered among the Christians of the former Byzantine empire, including the Nicaean celebration of a feast day for Felicitas, which he reports was known to John III Doukas Vatatzes through the alleged possession of the second half of Ovid’s incomplete Book of Days.[9]

William also answered a long-standing question, demonstrating by his passage north of the Caspian that it was an inland sea and did not flow into the Arctic Ocean; although earlier Scandinavian explorers like Ingvar the Far-Travelled had extensive knowledge of the region, William was the first to answer the question in written form.

William's report is divided into 40 chapters. Chapters 1-10 relate general observations about the Mongols and their customs. Chapters from 11 to 40 give an account of the course and the events of William's voyage.

The report of William of Rubruck is one of the great masterpieces of medieval geographical literature, comparable to that of Marco Polo, although they are very different. William was a good observer, and an excellent writer. He asked many questions along the way and did not take folk tale and fable as truth.

In May 1254, during his stay among the Mongols, William entered into a famous competition at the Mongol court, as the khan encouraged a formal debate between the Christians, Buddhists, and Muslims, to determine which faith was correct, as determined by three judges, one from each faith.[10] A Chinese participated with William in the competition.[11]

EditionsEdit

The Latin text of an incomplete manuscript containing only the first 26 chapters, together with an English translation by Richard Hakluyt was published in 1599.[12] A critical edition of the complete Latin text prepared by the French historian Francisque Michel and the English antiquarian Thomas Wright was published 1839.[13] An English translation by William Woodville Rockhill, The Journey of William of Rubruk to the Eastern Parts, was published by the Hakluyt Society in 1900;[14] and an updated translation by Peter Jackson in 1990.[15]

List of manuscriptsEdit

Manuscript[a] Date Notes
A Corpus Christi, Cambridge, MS 181, pp. 321–398[17] Last quarter of the 13th century Oldest and the basis of Van den Wyngaeret's 1929 critical edition.
B Corpus Christi, Cambridge, MS 66A, ff. 67r–110r[6] First third of 14th century Contains a historiated initial at the beginning of the text and includes some chapter titles in the margins.
C Corpus Christi, Cambridge, MS 407, ff. 37r–66r[18] Beginning of 15th century Ends after Chapter 26 paragraph 8.
D British Library, MS Royal 14 C XIII ff. 255r–236r[19] 15th century Ends after Chapter 26 paragraph 8. Used by Richard Hakluyt for his 1599 translation.
E Yale University Library, New Haven, Beinecke MS 406 ff. 93r–142v[20] 15th century

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ Details of manuscripts A to D taken from Jackson and Morgan 1990.[16]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Now French Flanders in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais région (Nord département) of France.
  2. ^ "William Rubruck," from the Catholic Encyclopedia.
  3. ^ Grousset 1970, pp. 280-281.
  4. ^ Frances Wood, The Silk Road: two thousand years in the heart of Asia 2002:119.
  5. ^ Morris Rossabi (2014). From Yuan to Modern China and Mongolia: The Writings of Morris Rossabi. Leiden: Brill. pp. 670–. ISBN 978-90-04-28529-3.
  6. ^ a b "Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 066A". Parker Library on the Web, Stanford University. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  7. ^ Jackson & Morgan 1990, Frontispiece.
  8. ^ De Weese, Devin A. (1994). Islamization and Native Religion in the Golden Horde. Penn State Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-271-01073-8.
  9. ^ Geschichte der Mongolen und Reisebericht, 1245-1247. (Trans. and ed., Friedrich Risch.). Leipzig: E. Pfeiffer, 1930, p. 174, n.34
  10. ^ Weatherford, Jack. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World. p. 173.
  11. ^ Sangkeun Kim (2004). Strange Names of God: The Missionary Translation of the Divine Name and the Chinese Responses to Matteo Ricci's "Shangti" in Late Ming China, 1583-1644. Peter Lang. pp. 141–. ISBN 978-0-8204-7130-3.
  12. ^ Hakluyt 1599.
  13. ^ Michel & Wright 1839.
  14. ^ Rockhill 1900.
  15. ^ Jackson & Morgan 1990.
  16. ^ Jackson & Morgan 1990, p. 52.
  17. ^ "Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 181". Parker Library on the Web, Stanford University. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  18. ^ "Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 407". Parker Library on the Web, Stanford University. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  19. ^ "MS Royal 14 C XIII". British Library. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  20. ^ "Le Pelerinage de vie humaine, etc.: Beinecke MS 406". Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Retrieved 13 November 2019.

SourcesEdit

Further readingEdit

  • Chiesa, Paolo (2008). "Testo e tradizione dell Itinerarium di Guglielmo di Rubruck". Filologia mediolatina: rivista della Fondazione Ezio Franceschini (in Italian and Latin). 15: 133–216. ISSN 1124-0008.
  • Dawson, Christopher, ed. (1955). The Mongol Mission : Narratives and Letters of the Franciscan Missionaries in Mongolia and China in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth centuries. Translated by a Nun of Stanbrook Abbey. London: Sheed and Ward. OCLC 16535040.
  • Kappler, Claude-Claire; Kappler, René (1985). Voyage dans l'empire Mongol : 1253-1255 (in French). Paris: Payot. ISBN 978-2-228-13670-9.
  • Risch, Friedrich (1934). Reise zu den Mongolen 1253-1255. Veroffentlichungen des Forschungsinstituts für vergleichende Religionsgeschichte an der Universität Leipzig, II. Reihe, 13 (in German). Leipzig: Deichert. OCLC 6823121.
  • Jackson, Peter (1987). "William of Rubruck: A review article". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 119 (1): 92–97. doi:10.1017/S0035869X00166997. JSTOR 25212071.
  • Van den Wyngaert, Anastasius (1929). "Itinerarium Willelmi de Rubruc". Sinica franciscana (in Latin). I: Itinera et relationes Fratrum Minorum saeculi XIII et XIV. Florence: Claras Aquas. pp. 164–332. OCLC 215235814.

External linksEdit