Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Basketball Association/New assessment scale draft
National Basketball Association Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
WNBA and D-League edit
Do these fall under this project? I do see WNBA articles under Category:Top-importance NBA articles? Frankly, I dont recall any WNBA discussions ever being brought up in WP:NBA.—Bagumba (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- D-league definitely fall under WP:NBA. Don't know about WNBA, though.—Chris!c/t 01:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I just found Wikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball Association/WNBA task force, and your name is on it :-) I'll ping WP:BASKETBALL as well.—Bagumba (talk) 02:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
All-Rookie edit
Mid links to List of National Basketball Association awards, but I dont think NBA All-Rookie Team is automatically indicative of a players long-term importance in the NBA. Should we exclude it altogether, limit it to 1st team, or just leave it for convenience? Ideally, I'd say to exclude it. A lot of these players end up being more important because they have relative long careers, not because they are remembered as All-Rookie.—Bagumba (talk) 07:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Championship edit
What about championship players won? I personally don't think they matter much because even benchwarmer wins championship. Thought?—Chris!c/t 04:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The scale might need some tweaking. I personally think he should be Mid, but he is High based on the current criteria of 3+ All-Star. Maybe changing to 4+? Thoughts?—Chris!c/t 01:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- If I look at List of NBA All-Stars, maybe it should be 5+ AS? And what about the 3+ All-NBA, is that still OK? I'm even wondering if 7+ years in NBA can be tweaked up some more.—Bagumba (talk) 02:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Move to main page edit
I think it is more or less stable. Should we just move it? We can fine tune other things later, like owners and execs.—Bagumba (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)