Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kabbalah/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

I would like to see this image added

Hello, I'm new.

I think this deserves attention.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Godislove.png

It is a modified version of: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Tree_of_life_kircher_hebrew.png

God Bless.

--TaylorOliphant (talk) 12:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The title "Godislove" is problematic. Is there any source that this is what the image means? Jon513 (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure. Should I change it? I'm new, sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TaylorOliphant (talk • contribs) 14:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

It's been what I would consider spammed onto quite a few talk pages, so I would ignore it, especially if it's a user-modified picture. MSJapan (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Suggested Merger

Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult

• Seeing as how the QBLH is a very limiting or rather limited subject, and is in fact a sub cat of the occult, why not combined forces and work under one project? This way everyone can work together to achieve the same end. Just a thought. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Having studied Kabbalah in the Western Tradition for the past 25 years, I have seen that any system of mysticism, occultism or religious belief can be placed on the Tree of Life. For example, if we look at the 'thorny' subject of Wicca (commonly known as witchcraft), the main deities can be placed in the supernal triad, and the lesser deities on the Sephiroth below it. Melchior68 (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC) [Melchior68 12 Sept. 2008]

Ein Sof?!

Can somone who is fluent in Hebrew take a look at the Ain Soph article please? Someone has posted the spelling of it has either Ein Sof or Ain Suph? Are these variations acceptable? And if so why? Is wikipedia allowing Hebrew to be bastardised now?--Redblossom (talk) 19:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, several pages use "Ein Sof" as an alternate spelling, as indicated by google here, particularly in connection with the Kabbalah. "Ain Suph" isn't used as often, as shown here, but is used as well. John Carter (talk) 19:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Would it not make life easier if a Rabbi or a fluent Hebrew speaker was solicited to go over all the Kabbalah articles to ensure proper spelling is accorded and used within proper context? It would ensure that the articles were seen has a reasonable piece of academia and not someones internet hobby on the side? Can we have a decision on this?--Redblossom (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The one question I have, and this might be just me, is whether the proper Hebrew spelling as thought today would necessarily be the most appropriate to the article. In some cases, I have seen where what is technically an improper spelling, but the more recognized form of a term within that particular context, is the one used for a title, largely because that better known spelling makes it preferable according to WP:NAME. Having said that, it might not be a bad idea to create a user subpage listing the various spellings by choice and letting some of the more active members of the project look it over to determine which one should be chosen as the article's title. John Carter (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles flagged for cleanup

Currently, 205 articles are assigned to this project, of which 82, or 40.0%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place the following template on your project page:

{{User:WolterBot/Cleanup listing subscription|banner=WikiProject Kabbalah}}

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Kabbalah

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:06, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move discussion at Kabbalah

There is a move discussion in process at Talk:Kabbalah#Requested move. Bob (QaBob) 14:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Template:Sefirot

Template:Sefirot, as of this post, uses Media:Ktreewnames.png. It seems an inappropriate/unrepresentative image. The transliterations are non-standard, as is the representation of Daath in the way it is right now. Also, the visual texturing clashes slightly.

There's all of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cabalism that one could use.

The existing imagemap might even work as-is. YhnMzw (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

User:YhnMzw/Template:Sefirot Fixed. YhnMzw (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

I like one of the templates they had before, which also has the Hebrew letters in it. I don't know why Hebrew letters are so sparse in the Kabbalah articles - it adds to the "feel" of the article if you include more of the original Hebrew terms (in Hebrew). As for transliterations, since Wikipedia is an encylopedia, the Kabbalah articles should follow the transliteration standards set by the modern encyclopedic researchers of Kabbalah (who, by the way, all know Hebrew, so don't make mistakes), ie. Gershom Scholem, and the Encyclopdia Judaica articles, for starters.Jimhoward72 (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)