Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Black Monday (1987)/archive1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SandyGeorgia in topic MOS matters

MOS matters

edit
  • @SandyGeorgia: Maybe this wasn't meant to sound passive aggressive, but it really did come across that way. You presumably did not note that during my open source review above, I stated: "Consistently use xxx–yyy for page ranges, per MOS:NUMRANGE. At the moment, a mix of xxx–yyy and xxx–yy are used." Harrias (he/him) • talk 21:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • MOS:PERCENT seems to disagree with the way the percentages are written in the lead, and there is some inconsistency between the symbol and the words, but the guideline is gibberish so I'm unsure how to fix those.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

PS, it seems I caused the HarvRef errors; sorry (iPad editing, as usual). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Would you strike through the comment about HarvRef errors then, please?
I changed % to percent.
For page range errors, I assume you mean something like "151–53" (sic) instead of "151–153". I see that you fixed one error, thanks! Do you see others? I looked fairly carefully, and I did not see any.
Finally, your script seems to have fixed any MOSDATE errors... thanks! § Lingzhi (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but caused another error at the same time. As there is nothing of significance in this section now, I will move it to talk once I am not iPad editing from a hotspot. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done All resolved; this was a very abbreviated look at MOS matters-- I didn't have time for more. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply