Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/December

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2013

Proposals,December 2013

Category:Glaphyriinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose this category to pick up {{Glaphyriinae-stub}}, (59 P). Although this is just under the established cutoff, building this category will reduce parent Category:Crambidae stubs back under 800 pages. Dawynn (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Support given the size of the parent. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Israel transport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Although we only have 56 {{Israel-transport-stub}}s, I think that we should create a category - we're close to the 60 mark, and this category is currently upmerged into 2 categories which are each over a full page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Support. Close enough for my vote. Dawynn (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Other speedy requests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm tired of piece-mealing these requests. The following are ready for promotion:

Dawynn (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Support all. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Country-based film categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy requests for a half dozen new categories.

Dawynn (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Lizard stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy requests to make two new subcategories for the lizards:

Dawynn (talk) 15:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Bolivian building and structure stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another speedy proposal. We have enough for a Bolivian airport category. In order to build a proper hierarchy, we could use a general Bolivian building and structure category:

Dawynn (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Category:Gelechioidea stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Here are a couple of speedy proposals, to help alleviate the overloaded Gelechioidea category.

This will take the parent category down from nearly 800 to less than 250 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Exploratory templates for Category:Hypsogastropoda stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following new templates and potential categories. The numbers indicate population in the permanent category, not necessarily reflective of how many are truly stubs.

Dawynn (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I support tags for all but Category:Newtoniellidae‎ (this is neither a stub category intersection, nor a category with even 30 articles - let alone 30 stubs); and categories for all but Newtoniellidae and Category:Cochlespiridae (only 44 stubs). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Hemiptera stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
There are currently over 830 articles in this category and potentially well over 10,000. It would aid editors like myself, wishing to expand stubs, if we could break them down a bit. For starters, I'd propose doing so by suborders. Thus:

  1. {{Auchenorrhyncha-stub}} for stubs in Category:Auchenorrhyncha‎
  2. {{Coleorrhyncha-stub}} (not {{Peloridiidae-stub}} or {{Prosorrhyncha-stub}}) for the Peloridiidae stubs and allied paleontological ones, See Coleorrhyncha
  3. {{Heteroptera-stub}} for stubs in Category:Heteroptera‎
  4. {{Sternorrhyncha-stub}} for stubs in Category:Sternorrhyncha

While #2 above is problematically and would not have 60 stubs, I propose it for comprehensiveness, so that no stubs would eventually be left at Hemiptera stubs, just subcategories. --Bejnar (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Support templates. Dawynn (talk) 15:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/December&oldid=1077710025"