Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 November 17
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 16 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 18 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 17
edit00:24:22, 17 November 2021 review of submission by 110.9.172.153
edit
110.9.172.153 (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
07:51:03, 17 November 2021 review of draft by 157.41.50.157
edit
There are many reliable sources and secondary sources available in googles and internet. But I can't chose the appropriate links to produce. Please you search and mention here the exact sources which is needed for an article page. Thank you 157.41.50.157 (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
157.41.50.157 (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- It isn't up to others to add sources for you. If you would like to see this draft placed in the encyclopedia, you need to do the work. Please read about what reliable sources are as well as Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
09:24:32, 17 November 2021 review of submission by Talzie
edit
Talzie (talk) 09:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- The subject is not significantly notable. The sources listed are two facebook pages (which are generally not accepted), the page for the college (which is a primary source) and a website from the government which doesn't even mention the group.Naraht (talk) 09:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
09:41:44, 17 November 2021 review of submission by Syedshoaib370
edit
Syedshoaib370 (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Syedshoaib370 Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is completely unsourced. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, please see the autobiography policy. Wikipedia is interested in what others say about you, not what you say about yourself. The vast majority of people on this planet do not merit Wikipedia articles. Please use your preferred social media to tell the world about yourself. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
10:40:18, 17 November 2021 review of submission by Pragadeesh mr dark
edit
Pragadeesh mr dark (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Pragadeesh mr dark Wikipedia is not here for you to self publicise. Get a web site of your own please. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 10:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
17:19:17, 17 November 2021 review of submission by 216.8.147.122
editHe is listed as one of the leaders of the First Serbian Uprising in all major encyclopedias in Serbia. Also, Wikidata carries his bio. 216.8.147.122 (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
20:17:20, 17 November 2021 review of submission by Maggiestorm
edit- Maggiestorm (talk · contribs)
Hello! This is my first time creating a Wiki page. This school exists, the reference to the school is in the article - you can see all the copy matches. So I'm not sure what notability is missing at this time.
Maggiestorm (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- First of all, please do not copy material from elsewhere onto Wikipedia, for two reasons: 1) Doing so is almost always a copyright violation and 2) most texts not specifically written for Wikipedia are unsuitable for Wikipedia. While the first reason can be "healed" in some cases, the second is usually not. With regards to your post above, please be aware that Wikipedia uses a special definition of the term "noteability". Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- On a second view, the amount of copy/pasted material does not appear to be as big as I initially thought, however, it's still overly promotional. If you're writing a new version, avoid puffery and base your draft on what independent, reliable sources have written about the school. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 21:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- As a note, I’ve left a message at User talk:Maggiestorm. The draft was previously a direct copy of the website, but Maggiestorm rewrote it to avoid copyright violation. As you’ve mentioned, it still reads promotionally, and I can’t find any independent reliable sources. Politanvm talk 21:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- On a second view, the amount of copy/pasted material does not appear to be as big as I initially thought, however, it's still overly promotional. If you're writing a new version, avoid puffery and base your draft on what independent, reliable sources have written about the school. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 21:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)