Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 March 10

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< March 9 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 10

edit

05:36:29, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Sauravgupta7297

edit


Sauravgupta7297 (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I wanted to Know why my article on The Opinion Express Group is not moved to the MainSpaceas it is about the News Magazine which is currently running in India. All the other News Magazine pages are already in the mainspace I have posted my article 4 to 5 times with all the official documents as the references and still, it says that the content is for Promotion I have just written About the organization and the History and just the Notable contributors; Please tell me how it is Promotional content. you can review the Page of India Today Magazine then that page is also a Promotional page!!! I have been working on it for months now and it becomes really frustrating for me because everytime my page has been deleted and the reason is the same Promotional purpose I request you to please review my draft and tell me what should I change in my article to make it verifiable please!!! Sauravgupta7297 (talk) 05:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sauravgupta7297 The reason for the decline was given by the reviewer at the top of your draft. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about the existence of something; Wikipedia articles summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability.
That other articles exist is not relevant; see other stuff exists. It could be that those other articles are also inappropriate, but simply have not been addressed yet. We can only address what we know about, and as this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate content to go undetected. This is why each draft or article is judged on its own merits.
If you are associated with this magazine, please review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:23:47, 10 March 2021 review of submission by LAngeli07

edit


LAngeli07 (talk) 07:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LAngeli07 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
LAngeli07, You don't ask a question, but your draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:36:03, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Threedotsmedia

edit


Threedotsmedia (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, user blocked. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:12:28, 10 March 2021 review of submission by 182.190.222.152

edit


182.190.222.152 (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why still rejected?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.190.222.152 (talk)

Your draft was rejected because it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place for businesses to tell the world about themselves; we are only interested in what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable business. If you work for this business, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. If you have additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. This is easier to do in the full desktop version of Wikipedia, even in a browser on a phone. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:15:08, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Ciuffoly

edit


Ciuffoly (talk) 11:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ciuffoly You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If you are attempting to write about yourself, please review the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:51:42, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Ciuffoly

edit

what is wrong ? Ciuffoly (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ciuffoly, Put plain, you fail WP:BIO. If you want to advertise yourself please use social media Fiddle Faddle 14:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:56:31, 10 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Beeloser

edit


Looking for some feedback on the attempts that I have made to comply with the rules since the page was declined. I've removed many of the references to the bbka website - clearly, in hindsight, no help in proving notability - and used alternatives from third parties I've declared that I am a beekeeper and not receiving any benefit for creating the page. TIA --Beeloser (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beeloser (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beeloser, I suggest you resubmit for review. Fiddle Faddle 08:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:49:53, 10 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Leoreleu

edit


The draft for the creation of a webpage for the mathematician Assyr_Abdulle from the (EPFL, Switzerland) was denied https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Assyr_Abdulle. I have difficulty to understand why: there are reliable independent source, on the academic side the research is a major player in his field that got important recognition from scientific society (like SIAM). My goal is to do an entry for each person that got the SIAM Wilkinson Prize

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Wilkinson_Prize_in_Numerical_Analysis_and_Scientific_Computing

The reviewer shall explain me why this research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexing_Ying meet the standard of Wikipedia while this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Assyr_Abdulle not.

Leoreleu (talk) 17:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leoreleu, You have a good objective. I will quarrel with your last paragraph. No one article on Wikipedia sets any sort of precedent for any other article. Please do not make that argument,ment. It is unlikely that this question will be answered.
Draft:Wilkinson abd eng has been rejected in favour of your working upon Draft:Assyr Abdulle, therefore please work on that draft. The former will not proceed further, The latter will. Fiddle Faddle 17:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is the relationship between sociology and public administration — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.205.113.55 (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is a raven like a writing desk? Fiddle Faddle 22:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:46:14, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Sultanqureshi87

edit


Sultanqureshi87 (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The draft has been rightfully deleted as blatant spam. --Kinu t/c 19:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:50:44, 10 March 2021 review of submission by JonoLynch-Staunton

edit

Hello,

I worked very hard to create a neutral article for 'Rocket Science' looking at many other companies within the same field which have already been verified and have pages on Wikipedia.

I used respected outside sources within the industry as references. Despite being diligent and trying to following the guidelines and my tone I've had the article rejected.

Please could I get some help to what is wrong and how the article may be fixed in terms of change tone or sources.

I looked at similar companies in the field who have had their profiles ok'd - eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embankment_Films https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HanWay_Films

before starting to create the article in the hope that meant the tone I used was safe and within the permitted guidlines.

Having done that it would be great if any advice could be given on how to amend the tone to an acceptable place

I value Wikipedia and am really very disheartened at the moment.

Thank you in advance for your help.

With best wishes, Jonathan JonoLynch-Staunton (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Without commenting directly on the content of the draft, I think it would be ideal for you to disclose your conflict of interest here. --Kinu t/c 19:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:23:14, 10 March 2021 review of submission by Heribert Julià

edit


I've created a page about Spanish photographer Yosigo and the draft has been declined because "submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

All the references I have used are media and press articles about him, so they aren't just passing mentions. Moreover, they are articles published in newspapers and magazines unrelated to this photographer so, in other words, they are independent of the subject.

In conclusion, I don't really understand why the article submission has been declined neither what can I improve to solve the reason it was declined for... :S

Could you help me with that?

Thanks!!!

Heribert Julià (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heribert Julià, you should have read the Reviewers Comment which says that it does fit into WP:NARTIST, your sources are by the way primary blogs and self-published or promotional ones which do not fit into our criterias of being a WP:RS, the only exception would be El Diario but this is not sufficient. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommanderWaterford, thanks for your answer! I will try to update the aricle so it better fits into WP:NARTIST. About the references I have used, there is one blog owned by Gabriela Cendoya, one of the main specialist on Spanish photography books. The other references are well-known online magazines about photography, arts, and culture. Anyway, I will also try to look for more references.

Thanks again!!! Heribert Julià (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:21:02, 10 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Kwabenabaop

edit


The article is the lyrics of a song (the FIRST Ghana National Anthem which we sang every morning at assembly as school pupils of the then elementary school nationwide. Our poor record keeping and the opposition against the first Ghana government, particularly after the first coup d'etat in 1966, are reasons that this problem/confusion has occurred. There are other supporting posts on YouTube but that platform unfortunately does not qualify for credibility. So the possible verification now can only be from the aged Ghanaians who also sang the first National anthem in the late fifties and early sixties before the overthrow of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah. Any suggestions on how this can be done? Kwabenabaop (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kwabenabaop, I would suggest to ask for some help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ghana, Facebook and/or Youtube as sources will not help. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_March_10&oldid=1012371519"