Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 25

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< July 24 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 26 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 25

edit

04:14:50, 25 July 2021 review of draft by 2603:8000:CF01:6AAD:7C20:7063:F322:EBEC

edit


My article has been rejected twice evidently because it’s not noteworthy enough. But the author of the story on which the article is based has had several other stories given articles on Wikipedia. Stephen King has almost every single one of his stories on Wiki. Why not this one?

2603:8000:CF01:6AAD:7C20:7063:F322:EBEC (talk) 04:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just because Stephen King wrote it does not make it notable by default. We do not accept notability-by-osmosis; we want to see professional reviews/criticism of the book; the issue here is that the article as writ is literally just a plot synopsis and naught else. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC) (Amended 08:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC) )[reply]

Stephen King didn’t write it. The writer of the story, Thomas Ligotti, has two other story articles that are “literally” just plot summaries. Why are those fine but mine is not?

The reason I brought up King is that he has dozens of articles based on stories that are only plot summaries. So there seems to be some wiggle room.

13:06:17, 25 July 2021 review of submission by Divyanshu Tejwani

edit

Hello sir. I please check out the references in the article also I am notable if you don't believe me you can search "Divyanshu Tejwani" on Google. Please sir this article is important to me please don't do this to me. I beg you sir I beg you Divyanshu Tejwani (talk) 13:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:10:38, 25 July 2021 review of draft by Yoitsjae

edit


Hi, I hope you're well.

First off, I would like say thanks for reviewing my article.

However, i'm confused as to why my submission was denied? I do not have any affiliation with Saatchi Yates. So i'm not sure how my article feels like advertisement? Their gallery is on Cork Street which has a rich history of art galleries and artists. Thus feel that it is an important part of the history of contemporary art.

I strongly feel that this is an important organization such as 'Lisson Gallery' which is also situated on Cork Street.

If you can please provide any advise Doric Loon (talk) , that would be great.

Thank you.

Yoitsjae (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yoitsjae in its current state the draft is merely saying "it exists". There is nothing that shows that anyone, other than directly connected people, has taken note of it's existence and regards it important enough to independently write about it in reliable sources such as magazines and newspapers. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yoitsjae Another thing, you mentioned Lisson Gallery, now compare that article to your draft. A major element of the Lisson Gallery article is the History section which is sourced from a variety of mainstream news and art publications. That's the core of the article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:10:51, 25 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Divyanshu Tejwani

edit


Sir Please re-review my page Divyanshu Tejwani the name is notable you can search Divyanshu Tejwani on Google please sir don't do this to him please I beg you sir I beg you.


Divyanshu Tejwani (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We don't cite Amazon, Soundcloud, or Wikipedia, and your last two sources are identical due to being a republishing of a press release from Issuewire. None of your sources are acceptable in the slightest. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 01:58, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:15:27, 25 July 2021 review of submission by Sajidbuzz

edit


Sajidbuzz (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We do not cite Spotify, and you have literally no other sources. For a biography of a living person, this is completely unacceptable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:54:29, 25 July 2021 review of draft by Garcon-gaz

edit


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:OChain has been rejected for publication due to a lack of notable resources. I've added a few more since then but have been avoiding the clearly commercial mentions due to sales agreements with Amazon and Oracle (who sell 0Chain services) and partnerships with other organisations ('x is proud to announce its partnership with 0Chain'). Is this the correct approach? Am I hurting the article's notbability claims by ignoring them?

Garcon-gaz (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:54:35, 25 July 2021 review of draft by Biloxiprohockey

edit


I am the social media guy for a group called "Biloxi Pro Hockey". We are trying to get a wikipedia article written so past hockey teams in Biloxi, the Mississippi Surge, and Mississippi Sea Wolves aren't the first results when searching "Biloxi Pro Hockey" on Google. The references I listed when trying to create the "Biloxi Pro Hockey" wikipedia article are all media references and really all I have to go with because there was a press conference to announce 3 neutral site games that will be played at the Mississippi Coast Coliseum this December. I hope you can help get an article published, I don't think I wrote anything that violated anything.


Biloxiprohockey (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see your user talk page for important information about your username. Wikipedia has no interest in enhancing or otherwise affecting search results for your organization. Our sole concern is in an article summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about an organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. If you have nothing except media events to cite, your organization would not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:07:29, 25 July 2021 review of submission by Abhishekgarg224

edit

Hi! Just need some clarification regarding Citations in footnote and how can we resolve the same. Also if there are any other changes that needs to be made for the draft to be published. Abhishekgarg224 (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:55:56, 25 July 2021 review of submission by 613codify

edit

i'm not really certain why the references were bad. should some of them be deleted? this subject is probably notable as it earned a guinness world record. please advise as what to do to get this proper. thank you

613codify (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


please advise the issue of bad references. does some of them need to be deleted==if so which ones and why--thank you 613codify (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:02:11, 25 July 2021 review of submission by 122.132.184.97

edit

Does the rejection mean that I can't edit and resubmit the article anymore? I believe the former submission matched the purpose of Wikipedia and contained information in neutral point of view.

122.132.184.97 (talk) 22:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That the draft was rejected means that it will not be considered further at this time. 331dot (talk) 22:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_July_25&oldid=1036349213"