Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 April 28

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< April 27 << Mar | April | May >> April 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 28

edit

03:24:53, 28 April 2020 review of submission by 2409:4042:807:6361:C541:3AB9:F332:A3F7

edit

plz advise for sachin g lokapure artilce 2409:4042:807:6361:C541:3AB9:F332:A3F7 (talk) 03:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@IP it's WP:TOOSOON for this subject. In a few years, when it can established that this subject passes WP:NPERSON we can continue. For now this is the end of line. Victor Schmidt (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:15:20, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Amazingth

edit


Amazingth (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amazingth, The subject is not notable. I'm afraid we can't write about her. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


07:28:29, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Mike 06

edit

Draft: PLANETISATION ... Hi. I would like to ask for support regarding my attempt to write an article about the term Draft:planetisation. Please advise me how to make the next steps to improve the draft. thanks in advance. Mike 06 (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mike 06, Your draft needs use of inline sources. Its sources also need to show that the term is in wide use. Neologisms, such as the one you are writing about, have a pretty high bar for entry into the encyclopedia. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:27:32, 28 April 2020 review of submission by 39.59.89.230

edit


39.59.89.230 (talk) 09:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09:31:52, 28 April 2020 review of draft by NitroDanW

edit


Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia but I didn't realise it would be so challenging to get an article published. My initial draft was simply deleted so I had to start again. I've now had two reviews - April 24th and 27th. On both of these occasions, my draft was rejected but not deleted. I've done as was requested to create the references in the required way but the last review said that my sources were not creditable. I don't know what I can do to make this right as they are genuine sources for both printed and online media around the subject - Andy Carter, drag racer. If taking some out is the answer then so be it. I just would love to get this live as I've put a fair chunk of work into producing what I believe to be a hugely informative and factually correct article. All help very gratefully received. Kind regards, Dan Welberry.

NitroDanW (talk) 09:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NitroDanW Successfully creating a new article is the absolute hardest task to perform on Wikipedia. New users generally have an easier time if they first spend time(months) editing existing articles in areas that interest them, to get a feel for how Wikipedia operates and what is expected of article content. Regarding your draft, the sources you have offered do not seem to be independent reliable sources(click to read about what such sources are) and they don't seem to show how this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable racing driver. The sources you offer are also just weblinks and not properly written citations, see WP:REFBEGIN for a starter's guide on writing references. If you haven't already, you might want to read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, I'm grateful for your reply but it still leaves me a little puzzled. I fully agree that it's such a hard task but I'm wanting to create a new article that I believe is of value to readers and don't want to get involved with the editing of other user pages. I don't understand why the sources are not acceptable? They're independent and regarded as the most reliable in the sport of Drag Racing. I've even referenced the European FIA database which is the oracle for all racing speed/timing data. With regard to 'notable racing driver' point, I've read through the requirements and Andy Carter meets all of these. He competed successfully for many years in FIA competition and won four FIA European titles. The FIA is regarded as pinnacle body in motorsport and oversees the Formula 1 championship. One of the pictures I'd like to add, once we have a live article is of Andy receiving his FIA trophy alongside Michael Schumacher in Monaco. So, if we can somehow agree that actually the article is ok on these points, could we get to live by simply addressing the weblinks/citations? I obviously just want to get this right. Kind regards, Dan Welberry.

  On hold pending conflict of interest disclosure, see User talk:NitroDanW#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

10:28:17, 28 April 2020 review of draft by No name22

edit


No name22 (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, he is a Congressional Candidate: https://www.google.com/search?q=anthony+rogers+for+congress&rlz=1CATTSD_enUS736US736&oq=anthony+rogers+for+congress&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l3j69i60l2.3747j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 , Actor/Director on major streaming services, and a comedian. When you Google his name he comes up, and when you google "Anthony Rogers comedian" he comes up. Has a bunch of articles about him and his podcast online.

No name22 Merely being a candidate for public office does not meet the notability criteria for politicians, so he would need to be shown to meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable entertainer. You need to show this with, as the reviewer stated, significant coverage in independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 10:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:11:17, 28 April 2020 review of draft by Andrea Contursi

edit


I have problems with the visualisation of my article draft on "November revolution monument". I lost contact with the editing page!

Your draft is here Draft:November revolution monument but you have not added any content yet? Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:34:38, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Mro(Mru) people

edit


Mro(Mru) people (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Mro(Mru) people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) page is I ready finish writing for my article .Still not find wikipedia .Please heip me.Mro(Mru) people (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article already exists here Mru people (Mrucha). Theroadislong (talk) 13:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:04:00, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Safety.gaurav

edit

Beacuse is real person biography which im sharing here. Safety.gaurav (talk) 13:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Safety.gaurav Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. You should do that on social media. Please see the autobiography policy as to why writing about yourself is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. If you meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable person, someone will eventually take note of you and write about you. Please understand that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 13:08, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:34:26, 28 April 2020 review of submission by 195.132.158.100

edit


I don't understand why it is rejected while there are many references from top French medias and from Books... Please advise what concretely should be added to make it acceptable. Thank you in advance.

195.132.158.100 (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The references say little or northing about Najib Fayad, they are not significant coverage of him. Sources that would demonstrate notability (suitability for inclusion) do not seem to exist. The point of rejection is that there is nothing that could be added to the draft to make it an acceptable Wikipedia article. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:41:39, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Tanveerkhan27

edit


I request you to not delete this page of Anjum Lakhanvi's page and it should not be read. Earlier I had edited this page, because of some problem in that page, I deleted it, now do not delete this page, you are requested that you will not delete this page and this will make the article public.

Tanveerkhan27 (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tanveerkhan27, I cannot understand your question I'm afraid. Regardless, the draft has been deleted for various reasons. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:07:47, 28 April 2020 review of draft by Joshbyr

edit


Joshbyr (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

I’m wondering if someone can help me take a look at my draft and how likely it will get approved. Many Thanks

(Joshbyr (talk) 17:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Joshbyr, Likelihood? Low. Not everything is sourced. And his notability has not been clearly established. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:24:34, 28 April 2020 review of submission by MaysinFourty

edit


Hello, I've just created an article on Nikhil Deogun, a US-based journalist, and I'll be grateful to receive any feedback, or if anyone could review the submission. Thanks!

MaysinFourty (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MaysinFourty, The article is in the review queue, please be patient and wait for a review. It wouldn't be fair for you to jump the queue by posting here :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CaptainEek My apologies, and thank you for your polite message :) MaysinFourty (talk) 07:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:38:32, 28 April 2020 review of submission by BeverlyWoodRecords

edit


Hi,

I did make an edit on 4/27 - I just did it from an IP, and not an account. This was an edit made after the prior rejection. Feel free to view additions yesterday to see. Thank you. BeverlyWoodRecords (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BeverlyWoodRecords, Very few realtors are notable. This one is not. Edit something else. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:54:29, 28 April 2020 review of submission by Winston16

edit


hi I have spent many months editing and re-editing this page. i have done everything that was instructed. can someone check it out again please? Winston16 (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winston16, I"m afraid that the average rabbi, priest, or imam is not notable. They need to have been shown to be out of the ordinary for us to cover them on Wikipedia. The news coverage presented doesn't show that. I'm sorry that you've worked so hard for it all to come to naught, but please understand that the vast majority of topics are unsuitable for Wikipedia. Starting an article from scratch is the hardest thing to do here on Wikipedia. I hope you stick around and contribute to some existing articles, as doing so would teach you what is and isn't notable, and what our style and guidelines are. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


23:59:15, 28 April 2020 review of draft by Matthew.weller

edit


How can i improve this article so it won't be declined again??? Matthew.weller (talk) 23:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew.weller I'm honestly not sure that you can. There are no independent reliable sources to support any of the content in the article. A Wikipedia article should only summarize what independent sources have written about what I assume is your micronation. If no independent sources have written about it, it would not merit an article at this time. An example of a micronation that independent sources have written about is the Principality of Sealand. In addition, please read about conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 07:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_April_28&oldid=992107610"