Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 8

Help desk
< September 7 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 9 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 8

edit

00:17:01, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam

edit


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


COMBO 1,2 MYSQL-PASSWORD WIKIPEDIA EDIT MORE ALL OWNER MY NAME BENJAMIN QUINTELA SALDANHA AGUIAM

00:56:28, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam

edit


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC) {{SAFESUBST:Void|[reply]

I lost memory so like know what is mine? maybe

Combo 1,2 mysql-password more a few things

no know


if have logins passwords is prove

i no know

need a big help

thanks

01:05:42, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam

edit


3enjamin.A (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia i have any edit position ?

This is still not even suitable to be a draft, let alone an article as it has no content. I'm not sure what you are wanting to ask. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:16:45, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Chintan Rishabh Jain

edit


Chintan Rishabh Jain (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chintan Rishabh Jain: - you need to say what you want or are asking about. I confirmed the initial review 3 days ago (Sept 5th), if it's not about that, then please clarify. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:44, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Kalpatru

edit


Kalpatru (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalpatru: - I'm not sure what you're asking about. This isn't currently submitted to become an article (see article wizard for that). However, it also has no reliable secondary sources, so it will automatically be rejected if submitted before being improved. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:16:48, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Aghiadhokan

edit

I have noted that other software published wikipedia pages cite the official website as a reference, I have also put some additional references and the official Youtube channel of this application in order to directly refer to its features. The information is also generic and can be tested and proved by anyone who visits the official website, and download and test the application. Aghiadhokan (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aghiadhokan:, while a link to the company's site should generally be included, it doesn't provide anything to showing notability. All the sources here are either non-independent (they're linked to vimert) and/or non-reliable (such as a wiki or youtube). As a product, it needs to meet the same higher notability guidelines as a company. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]