Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 10

Help desk
< October 9 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 10

edit

03:47:55, 10 October 2018 review of draft by Alamgirfarhad

edit


Seeking your guidance/confirmation on my recent submission of the article whether the contents are okay to publish. Thanks, Alamgir Farhad Alamgirfarhad (talk) 03:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

08:12:15, 10 October 2018 review of draft by Brivati66

edit


This entry is for an actor who was a significant feature of British TV in the 1980s and 1990s. I have referenced external sources, where these exist, Guardian, Daily Mail, Express, The Stage, Time Out and British Comedy Classics but there has been no biographical work done on him as such. I can change the citations for his work away from wikipedia to other sources but that seems a bit of a cheat! Would welcome advice on the level of external citation which is necessary. He is clearly a significant cultural figure in popular television terms, as anyone growing up in the UK in the 1980s would tell you, but, as with many figures in popular cultures, he has not left a secondary literature imprint in the same way a politician has. I have read through many of the article creation guides and it seemed to me that I had cited the external sources to validate the quality of his work. thanks so much for any help. Brivati66 08:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Moved to Draft:Robin Kermode. You should try and provide a better citation than "Time Out, Date needed". The source may be reliable, but no reviewer is going to be able to find the source from that description. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:45, 10 October 2018 review of submission by Syedsadique

edit

Reason why the page was rekected Syedsadique (talk) 09:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:33, 10 October 2018 review of draft by IFRS17

edit

'Deferment rate' is a standard and well-known concept in property valuation. There is no promotional aspect to it. I can't understand why it would go into a queue of nearly 4,000 articles. There are many other articles missing in this important area of finance, I don't want to have to go through such a prolonged process just to improve the encyclopedia. IFRS17 (talk) 12:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IFRS17 (talk) 12:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • You can simply move it into article space yourself and then remove the AfC template. It's only people who have been registered less than 4 days with less than 10 edits who can't directly create articles. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 13:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh right, thanks for that! IFRS17 (talk) 13:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

13:03:19, 10 October 2018 review of draft by Pak-MI

edit


Pak-MI (talk) 13:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i want wikipedia to review this most important article & approve.

That was a lovely little tangle to fix. Another article had already been created in mainspace under the correct spelling. Then the general's fans decided to usurp the primary topic title from a much more comprehensive article about a rather better known cricketer. After merging and untangling moves and redirects it's all fixed up at Asim Munir (soldier). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:26:18, 10 October 2018 review of submission by HadenSeneyBeatz1

edit


HadenSeneyBeatz1 (talk) 19:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • 12 year old spamming even on his usertalkpage. Someone should block him for his own good. Legacypac (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]