Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 February 11

Help desk
< February 10 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 12 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 11

edit

02:26:18, 11 February 2015 review of submission by Tts22

edit

Hi, I am just getting started and wanted to know how much time does a typical article take to get reviewed? I had created this article almost a month back.I know there's severe backlog but giving an approximate date would be really helpful.I would also like to know where does my article stand with respect to it getting reviewed. Thanks and Cheers

Tts22 (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tts22: The current estimated time to clear the backlog is about 3 weeks. In your current state, I am concerned your submission is likely to be declined because it does not use enough reliable and independent sources. The best reference you have is the EE Times India source, but that looks like a press release, so although it may be reliable, it is not independent. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:39:00, 11 February 2015 review of submission by 95.44.71.238

edit

I have created and submitted a new page last week and a message from JMHamo was returned explaining that I should "cite sources" which I have now edited and completed. I have re-submitted the page however, I do not see this page appear in the Afc Submissions draft list. Could you advise that this page is indeed in your waiting list. Thanking you,

John Cuthbert


95.44.71.238 (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@John Cuthbert 221: Please remember to log in to your account when editing Wikipedia. You did not resubmit the draft for submission, so it was not queued. I have added two newspaper sources and passed the submission which is now at Mark McAllister. The rest of the article will also need to be appropriately sourced to meet the biography of living persons guidelines - have a look at where I've placed <ref> tags in the article as a guide. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:09:56, 11 February 2015 review of submission by Wikifrag

edit


I recently created an article on the actor Samuel James and, whilst waiting for it's approval, have discovered that within the last few days someone has beaten me to it and already created one!!! The other article was pretty basic so I've since edited/added to it by copying and pasting from my own. I'm hoping this means my article (when it is looked at for approval) will now be automatically deleted. Am I right? Or is there anything further I should do??

Due to my recent edits the two articles are now practically identical...

Many thanks

Wikifrag (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikifrag:   Done: I went ahead and rejected the draft as a duplicate. Thanks for your contributions! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:18:13, 11 February 2015 review of submission by Katya1812

edit

I am revising the draft to remove any copyright questions and have a question. Previously we had many duplicates which resulted in a Decline and I am concerned that the numerous titles (that cannot be revised) will still result in duplicate matches when checked. Can you check the revision and let me know if it is acceptable, and if the titles will cause any problem? Thank you very much

Katya1812 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:39:40, 11 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by *Yung Rhymes*

edit


I have made a Wikipedia draft which was not aloud because it did not claim notability can you help me with this

*Yung Rhymes* (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:53:53, 11 February 2015 review of submission by DHilbert

edit


On Feb. 8, I submitted a new article for creation on the topic of "Alone in North America"(film). JHUbal27 declined my article the next day, questioning my topic's notability, based on the reliability of my references, and asked me to improve my references. Could you please tell me which of these references are either unreliable, or not independent - and why? Thanks for your attention.


DHilbert (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DHilbert. Blogs are not counted as reliable, nor is IMDB as anyone can edit it. Facebook pages and twitter are not independent. But I have accepted your draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:55:06, 11 February 2015 review of submission by GK at CRG

edit


How do I add teh photograph of the person that this article is written about? thank you! GK at CRG (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GK at CRG - The answer would depend on exactly what photograph you wish to add. Please give us specific details about the photo such as a link if it is online or if it isn't online please explain how it came into your possession. The issue is mainly about ownership and copyright which we need to be very clear about before adding it anywhere on Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]