Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 December 3
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 2 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 4 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 3
edit
A.hoxhaj (talk) 00:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- @A.hoxhaj: Your article was declined because you copied and pasted it from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/rogowski in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. The information on that page says "© MMXIV" at the bottom, indicating that it is copyrighted material and cannot be posted elsewhere. All content at Wikipedia must be written in your own words. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Ralf Rogowski
edit- Redacted, do not paste articles here, instead use the form shown at top and link us to your draft.
My article was rejected due to lack of secondary sources. It is a very simple biography for which I have all of the original documents. For example, birth certificate, High School diploma, Art School diploma, original scholarship awards, proof of employment, original copies of magazine and newspaper articles. I have an original document for almost every sentence in the Article. According to Wikipedia these are useless. Am I correct or have I misunderstood something? Is there another way to go about this? Thanks for your time.
Peter Baranet (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Peter Baranet: There are two major issues with the citations in the article: verifiability and notability. The first, verifiability, could potentially be solved by uploading those documents to someplace public like Wikisource, but those documents wouldn't be accepted there without fixing the second issue, which is notability. Wikipedia requires notability to be shown through citations to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article (which is this case means independent of the artist, his schools, and galleries that show his work). There is nothing requiring such sources to be online, but there are a couple of things you can do to help the reviewer and the eventual readers of the article. For articles written before 1963, you can upload them to Wikisource. For more recent articles, which are still under copyright, you can include short quotes in your references. For example, in your reference to "New Yorker Magazine July 20, 1968" you can include the quote that backs up the assertion that he joined portrait painters at Portraits, Inc. Finally, your references to articles should include the title of the article, the article author (if given), and the page number(s) the article appeared on (if available). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:14, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
05:38:18, 3 December 2014 review of submission by PlantCellWalls
edit
Can you please help me turn it into a readable encyclopedia article? I apologise for my lack of knowledge - this it the first time I've created a wiki-page (well tried to). I tried to incorporate DGG's comments and have changed it a bit but I don't understand exactly what they meant by "And try to include a discussion of his work by references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements" - I have linked to all his important papers and other external sites as well as wiki pages. Any advice on how to get this done and accepted would be greatly appreciated, thanks Emma
PlantCellWalls (talk) 05:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
08:28:55, 3 December 2014 review of submission by Oyelekeajiboye
edit
Oyelekeajiboye (talk) 08:28, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oyelekeajiboye, what is your question? MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
10:57:24, 3 December 2014 review of submission by 519Clarke
edit
I have had no success in writing articles to my great disappointment the recent one was Draft:David Clarke (Author). I have a current one on the go Draft: Converted on LSD and would appreciate feedback so I can make any changed or amendments to avoid similar disappointment in my article being rejected. And if its is possible get feedback on how to rewrite the text of my original article Draft: David Clarke (Author).
David Clarke 11:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- David, you've been trying at this for months now, and your efforts are a good example of precisely why we advise people not to write about themselves and their work. You are consistently submitting drafts which do note meet WP:Notability, and are full of sources which do not meet WP:Reliable sources. On a few occasions, you present at least a few sources and facts which may reach Notability, such as a few pieces of coverage of the "Converted" book, but it's buried amongst a bunch of non-Reliable sources, and the draft is otherwise full of your personal musings as opposed to objective material.
- I really think you need to write about issues other than yourself. Frankly, at this point it appears you are not actually here to build an encyclopedia, but rather to continually push to use Wikipedia to advance yourself and your works, and your particular take on what appears to be some very localized schism of the Bierton Baptists. A lot of people have taken the time to provide you advice on these issue to no avail, so that's really cutting back on any motivation we have to help you further since best case scenario, we might end up with a few articles that mostly only really help you and your career. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
16:57:14, 3 December 2014 review of submission by ShannonRamsay
edit
ShannonRamsay (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm submitting a post on the nonprofit organization I founded, Trees Forever. The page was taken down by someone a while back. It isn't an article awaiting review, but rather organization history and status. Can it be uploaded?
- What you have there is indeed an article waiting review, that's precisely what the big "Review Waiting" yellow box is there for. And no, the draft you have is not at all suitable for Wikipedia. You can't simply write whatever you want and ask it be published, we are not LinkedIn or Facebook. The draft pretty much doesn't provide any of the features an article must have; it's written as an "About Us!!!" page and not as an article. The absolute key requirement for Wikipedia topics is WP:Notability, and you provide no evidence that this organization meets that requirement. Note I am not saying "your group doesn't matter", I'm saying you haven't provided evidence that it meets very specific criteria laid out at WP:Notability, so I strongly advise you read that guideline for more info. Secondly, it's worth reading WP:Conflict of interest. If you're here to promote an organization/company you're involved with, it's very hard to write neutrally enough to get an article accepted. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
17:00:41, 3 December 2014 review of submission by Dotronsya
edit
Hi, I submitted the "soundtracker" wikipedia page on October 30 and I still have no news, can I have a page status update? Thank you
Dotronsya (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- It seems this draft has been accepted, and is now at Soundtracker (music streaming). It needs some further work, judging by the templates at the top of it. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
17:08:43, 3 December 2014 review of submission by Mahinda22
edit
I've submitted my article on 22 October and am still waiting for review. Is there any issue with my submission or is it just the backlog? Thanks, Nathalie
Mahinda22 (talk) 17:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's just the backlog. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)