Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 August 24

Help desk
< August 23 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 24

edit

06:15:32, 24 August 2014 request for review by Tristanhead

edit


Tristanhead (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 06:15:32, 24 August 2014 request for review by Tristanhead[reply]

@Tristanhead: Both of these submissions are entirely unreferenced and read like original research. I recommending interacting with WikiProject Physics before you attempt to write a new article. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

08:04:49, 24 August 2014 review of draft by Taliop

edit


I have submitted my page for review a while ago, but it has not yet been approved. Is there anything I can do to speed up the process? Taliop (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews happen when a reviewer who believes they have the competence to review your draft takes the task on. All you can do is to continue to improve the draft while awaiting review. I shall have a look to see if I feel I am competent to review it in a moment. Fiddle Faddle 12:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Taliop: The article has not been submitted, so I have left a detailed pre-submission review comment on it. Please do submit it, but do attend to my comments at the same time. If there is anything you do not understand, either ask me directly on my own talk page, or come back to this section and ask. Fiddle Faddle 12:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:52:24, 24 August 2014 review of submission by 88.164.181.110

edit

My article about a UNESCO senior manager was rejected without any comments. Why is that? Is there any limitation on such personalities. I know of many UN senior manager who have their Wikipedia page. I can provide several examples from UNESCO itself. Why reject this one person? If you have issues with the content why not informing of your concerns?

I thought Wikipedia belonged to all of us and as long as the content was accurate we could publish articles on any subject. Clearly, I was mistaken.

88.164.181.110 (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't belong to anyone. No, Wikipedia does not publish articles on any subject. The criteria for whether to include or accept an article about a person (including UN senior managers) are at Wikipedia:Notability (people). If there are existing articles about other UN senior managers that do not meet any of these criteria, you are welcome to nominate them for deletion. It may well be that your article was not in fact rejected, or not in fact rejected without any comments, but since there is nothing at Draft:Saniye Gulser Corat, we can't tell. Please could you link us to the page in question, or even the page where you were notified about this? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21:05:08, 24 August 2014 review of draft by Avik sinha

edit


Dear team,

I am the admin of GuruBochon, and while crating the article about my page, I was using the contents directly from my website. Now all the image files are "speedily deleted" due to copyright issues. Now my question is, how come the copyright issue can appear, if the contents and images are designed by my own team? If I draw something on my PC, from where someone can expect that to be copied from somewhere else?

We are facing difficulties regarding this. Kindly assist us.

Thanks,
Avik Sinha
Admin - GuruBochon

Avik sinha (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But we have no idea who you are., You could be anyone at all. So we protect the copyright owner's copyright. IMagine if we did not protect that and your copyright were infringed. How angry would you be at that?
Please read Wikipedia:Donating copyright material, and go through the relevant processes. If you are truly the copyright owner this will be no problem for you.
I have   Declined your draft because it is improperly sourced. You seem to have proved it exists, but not that it is notable. Please read the comment on the draft. Fiddle Faddle 21:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]