Digimon Fusion – This article looks like a GA quality article to me right now, it has much in common with the example GA article in this post. Lots of good references, good grammar, etc. It's currently marked as C class — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignus3 (talk • contribs)
Ignus3, do you want to send it to peer review and then nominate it for GA afterwards? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's just C right now, Ignus3. There are several of possible non-reliable sources (see WP:RS and WP:A&M/RS) in reception, such as Mediaverum, DVDCorner, CulturedVultures, and Casule Monsters; theme songs is just a list, usually not recommended. It would be better if they were mentioned in the list of episodes and/or in their respective seasons. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Toradora! – It's been years since this got assessed, I can't remember what was still missing. The characters do have references, and plot section had a makeover. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite a comprehensive work AngusWOOF, but, in addition of missing a production section (which sometimes is almost impossible to create), there are other drawbacks. 1) The lead is not properly summarizing the article: there's no information on the series' reception and there's a discussion about the title that's not presented in the body (you can move this information to a footnote or you can incorporate in the body–maybe on a possible "production" section or just in the "media" section). 2) You do have to source some parts in "Characters" tagged with "volume & issue needed" (since 2016), as well as parts in "Light novels", "Internet radio show", and "Video games". Also, not sure why there's a "citation need" tag along with ref 40-backed(?) sentence. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
